AuT-time dilation, Hawking and company creep closer to what we've already seen in AuT

It is pretty clear from the series of posts and the steady agreement of the mainstream physics community.  Eventually...
Well, this is idiocy but it's getting close so it's worth mentioning.
http://www.scienceworldreport.com/articles/42037/20160613/there-is-a-way-to-escape-the-black-hole-stephen-hawking.htm
And the similar question, when they realize what they're looking at, what AuT has already defined, they'll have this figured out.
http://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-have-figured-out-how-to-see-inside-a-black-hole

This is Hawking and his peeps trying to get closer to where we're already at with Aut. But there is no special hell for physicists who steal something from someone, because there is no hell.  There is no algorithm for religion, heaven or hell; although I have found all of them here, and the result is this theory which, when the rest of the physicists get close enough will provide the answers you don't have yet.
The theory which precedes these articles by years goes towards the end of life of not only black holes (ct5), but matter (ct4).  What they call hairs we know to be decompression spirals.
One day these other physicists will arrive there moving backwards one step at a time and slap themselves on the back.
This is a physics version of pareidolia. That is, our tendency to see meaningful shapes and patterns in random objects.  You have to get to the origin and work outwards to find the right answer.
Where does relative change come from?  That's what I was thinking about earlier, the problem of time dilation which I will discuss in depth and which is something which is necessary, relative change is required in order to have life where everything is the result of perceived changes in the rate of change.  I have discussed this and I have seen this for what it is, but I have not fully defined how it gives rise to what we experience as life.  I seemed close as I swam, but I was continually interrupted love songs which made me remember the heaven and experience the hell.
Historically...
At first, I thought different states changed at different rates, but I proved (to myself anyway) this was not possible, part of the single algorithm solution.  Although perhaps still it is possible that the multistates break apart a single state change, it is possible, but if it's relative there are 3 choices; a higher time state (ct5) a lower state (space ct1) or the state of non-change, the singularity, i.e. relative to not changing  Lower states is suggested by the idea of time dilation, both gravity and movement mean intersecting with more space at a time, one through compression one through just the speed with which they interact with one or another.

And the way things interact...the way they go together...it is a fixed interaction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIdCo_QAz_E&index=17&list=PL00028477F00A729Ek