Building an algorithm 13-Would you like some pi with that Gravity

The basic formula for these is given in terms of "informational weight" earlier, but coming up with a specific method of combining the information is on the way, but it's a slow process.  These diagrams serve to give you some idea of the difficulty of getting to a single method of combining two prior states so before the fine tuning let's compare the gravity diagram with the pi diagram.
We're going to add another way that gravity may be expressed.  Again they all have to do with going from a quantum state to a linear state, but there is yet another shift in the methodology when we use the F-series accumulation.
By way of review the changes we've discussed previously are set forth in this diagram:

These are shifts within a state as x (the single variable driving the algorithm) changes.
Item A shows the gravity arising from relative changes between the positive and negative spirals, but this appears to be an expansion contraction equation (intersecting spirals) as opposed to a pure gravitational element.
NLC predicts and observations suggest that Gravity comes from a shift from non-linearity to linearity which can be shown in any of the other changes above, but it can also come from change that exists from the combining of two prior states to get to the current state in which case it evolves from the change from the diagram above to the next diagram.
In order to see this shift we have to modify the diagram above to get at least a feel for how the evolution of space curvature affects the outcome.
Pi suggests the universe vibrates as do the effects reflected by the intersecting F-series spirals which you arrive at mathematically with these models.
While the stupid say, "we can't be an algorithm because the table my computer sits on is too solid," the wise says "the lack of complete density (a more solid universe) indicates that there is an offset during the vibration required to give any space for movement at all."
Put another way, if the universe were not offset, when you tried to move through space it would be so compact that it would be impossible.  The amount of offset is almost irrelevant except in a relative sense, however, because dimension is clearly a illusion in an information based universe and as long as you can express a solution in terms of great distance, there is no actual separation between solutions necessary.
Questions about for the two separate spirals.  It even has to be asked if  one is merely the mirror image of the other or is it enough that it is on the negative spiral?  However, the math shows us there is more going on than merely imaging.
Gravity appears to arise from the change by adding two states to get to the third just as the other forces arise from this solution to the math equation (instead of the primitive Pre-AuT method of looking for forces and the cause or carriers (god forbid!) for forces, you instead say the solutions to the algorithm gives rise to solutions that we interpret and use as forces.
So lets look at another diagram that will show how the positive elements build on the positive spiral followed by the negative elements building on the negative spiral and this additive quality would suggest that the total amount of gravity would increase for the universe steadily but in small increments which would follow a universe of expansion and contraction around inflection points if you allow for a negative and positive expansion and contraction based not on the amount of gravity but instead on the amount of intersection tendency vs separation tendency in the numerous spirals generated as is discussed previously in the derviation of the big bang phenomena..
Whether you have positive or negative gravity is important because you can, in this scenario have a "net" gravity for any quantum state which is the amount of positive over negative gravity and this can shift depending on the spiral state.  In fact, compression and expansion inflection points requires that the net amount of attraction shifts which, in turn, suggests intersecting spirals and pi suggests that the build out of the universe involves first adding to the positive spiral and following that adding to the negative spiral.  Whether this involves adding both positive and negative to the positive spiral and then positive and negative to the negative spiral is less clear so below we will use a model that follows the derivation of pi..
While I use graphics to show the addition of prior states to form future states and while this is indicated in the durability of the universe, the actual method by which stacking occurs yields an uncertain, but observed method of stacking in the form of the forces we experience and history.  That is, we are in that solution so we see it in the forces that are present and the transitions that are observed.

This shows a combination of changing geometry (evolving pi) with combination compared to the more simple model where all elements remain the same

It's hard to read, but on the left is a column showing the un-edited  positive and negative points.  On the right, the points are modified at least for the first three values of x to show how the curvature of space is affected.  Later, the positive changes and negative changes reflected by the denominator in the pi equation are shown just through x=7.  In other words, we're looking at an insanely young universe, but we're seeing the two arms capable of development in different fashions depending on how the information is combined from each prior universe.

It is discussed in the small words, but we'll cover it in more detail later.

Thus endith part 13.