the k bomb

In my last blog I suggested that we were either 2% into the expansion phase or 98% of the way through it.  I'm uncomfortable with the 2% but I'm not so sure it's the wrong number.  After all, the universe doesn't really care whether I'm comfortable or not.   If it does, it obviously wants me uncomfortable because we're not writing this togehter.  I have no support, but I'm going to move on to the destructive phase of things and talk about the k-bomb.  Yes, I promised you that AuT theory would not disappoint you, that you'd be able do do something destructive with it.  You just have to be patient.
Now that I have predicted the "end" of our present universe, it will be fairly easy (because of the addititive quality of the F-series) to predict the actual age of the universe.  How, you ask?
It's actually quite simple, the complex looking universe being fairly simple.  First knowing the universe is 13.7 billion years old and, I'm going to use the shorter period for this entry, about 2.3 billion years from now it will start to contract (it's a curved function because it's averaged because of the pi function that ensures that it will never end as long as x can get bigger, any single function would have a long stable period, we can figure out from the expansion period what the contraction period will look like (there are many charts in the book showing the period when the spirals come together).  We know this will be longer for each universe based on the equation in that really long spreadsheet I put in one of the posts a few months back.
Anyway, the value of x for our universe (a subset of the value of x for all the universes so far) is roughly 32 billion years converted into seconds. and then multiplied  by 10^39.  That is a lot of x, but it's not as big a number as you'd think because the universe is defined by quantum moments which takes a lot less information that defininging it over a bunch of quantum moments.  In fact, I daresay my spreadsheet may actually cover that number in which case there would only be a few hundred (at most) big bangs so far, each adding to the x of the next one, but all those can be summed up.  See if we know how big x is for our universe approximately, we can get the exact number by looking for the closes spiral expansion or compression that matches it.    Part of that chart, by the way, appears in "A spiral in amber" although it did  not make the cut for "Spirals in amber" but you can find it in this blog if you spend some time looking.  Or you could write me and ask me to send you a copy of the spreadsheet, maybe I would, who knows?
Or, since you are too lazy to pick up the phone and call me, you can wait and I'll take some time to solve it in here.
But what's that?  This blog entry is called "the k-bomb."  We all know about Einstein and his H bomb.  That uses the conversion factor for ct4-ct3 to blow things up.  More particularly, the algorithm solves for us building 10,000 years of post ice-age society just so we can compress chemicals and explode them in order to satisfy the compression or expansion cycle for a particular group of spirals.  Yes, the crazy north koreans are just fulfilling an expansion/compression cycle as mandated by the F-series, pi building offset universe that we live in.  It's a lot of absurdity if you look at them, just to do some spiral decompression, but stupid as they are, if you look at the superpowers (usa, russia and china) of nuclear weapons, you see we're doing it on a much bigger scale and if you look  at world war ii, you basically see the same process.  Even so, compared to the activity within the earth or at the sun, it's a relatively minor amount of bother or algorithm solution in the grand schem of things. That is what we are, however.  We are algorithm solving results.  Well, you are anyway.  Just kidding, we all are.
But we're talking about a weapon more powerful than Einsteins.  A k bomb, which I now believe I have enough information to start on, can not only destroy an entire planet, but in relatively short order a solar system and even, given time, a galaxy.  Well, it would take a really, really  long time to destroy a galaxy and it wouldn't really destroy any of it, but it's a really powerful weapon that if applied properly could do a lot of damage, that is if you call change damage.  I'm not sure you can really call solving a math problem damage.  Of course, fortunately, it's rather hard to detonate a k-bomb, although its surprisingly easy to build.  No one has known how to build one before me, of course.
I will get to that.
The greeks, not surprisingly, given their early work into Algorithm Universe Theory, actually envisioned the k bomb in their mythology.  It's hard to believe that such a weapon was imagined 2500 years ago, but there you have it.   They envisioned the weapon and its results, but it was shrowded in superstition, or perhaps they actually did see it and hid it on purpose, who knows?
 There is some suggestion that they tried to build one over several generations, but it failed if they did and any attempt in my opinion was probably silly, like a child designing a nuclear weapons with tinkertoys.  You might be able to put something together that looked like a nuclear weapon, but it wouldn't be capable of detonation.
My k bomb should be capable of detonation with the same awful result that the greeks envisioned.  Imagine that?