Building an algorithm 14: ct1-speed and gravity and a non-steady state universe

Newton and Einstein math models predict that a static universe would not work.  In this way they incorrectly state that the universe must be either expanding or contracting and not static.
AuT correctly points out that the universe is not static at all, that change is an absolute requirement in the solution to the single variable universe although any particular solution defies both Newton and Einstein by remaining quantum and therefor static.
Also AuT suggest that the "universe" is neither expanding nor contracting but that it merely defines an average which reaches inflection  points according to an algorithm and that at the inflection points the average is either expanding or contracting.
However, at any point the universe is unbalanced.or it would become non-linear and is both expanding in portions of the solution and contracting in portions of the solution even at inflection points, although the theory is that the proportion of expanding at the end of any compression point is less than the inflection point before corresponding to the evolving solution of pi.
It is suggested by the model that the amount of ct1 contacted over time by a "higher compression state (e.g. ct4)  increases speed.  That is between F(x) and F(x-1) if a ct4 has a common solution within a series of adjacent solutions with more ct1 states as opposed to the same ct1 states then it moves faster (compare if it contacts more -ct1 (the opposite spiral solution).
It is also suggested that if the number of ct1 states contacted shifts between a common set of ct1 states than you get the same result which explains gravity giving rise to the same phenomena of time dilation.
This in turn suggests that in a compression algorithm, ct4 or 5 in particular, more ct1 is circulated more quickly.  This suggests that in a compression state that the solution over a given set of separate quantum states remains more concentrated but that the circulation speed between the outermost quantum states at least and ct1 states occurs more often.
Presumably, "more" gravity is possible from the ct(4) state over a given set of locations over a certain amount of time.  That is as more ct1 space is squeezed out by the presence of multiple ct4 states, it generates more gravity in a given location but also should have more time dilation outside of the more concentrated areas which should be capable of observation in a system.  The alternative is that the concentration of ct1 states with ct4 states is not affected by the density of the ct1 state.
In this way, speed and gravity effects of ct1 solutions in proximity to ct4 affect it in a similar fashion which suggests that one is the effect in any single F(x) solution and results from the change between F(x) solutions based on the interface of ct1 and ct4 in adjacent solutions with the same ct1 states increasing concentration and different ct1 states creating speed.
It is also suggested Waves and photons are sufficiently spread out so that the amount of ct1 is not crowded out which follows that the amount  of ct1 contacting those two states is constant since none is crowded out by a compression solution giving them a constant maximum speed relative to ct1.