AuT Lumpy time 3 The exchange process

This series of posts has hit a nerve as it should, because it redefines relativity.  It does what the rest of AuT does, it does the rest of what I have said for the past 3 years which is that all prior physics is merely the study of shadows and this sort of throws it in your face.
I say in all modesty that the beauty of the theory, my theory, is that it explains all the unknowns of prior physics, that I have already explained those in general terms and it only remains to get more specific.  It would be nice to have a more glorious explanation, something less mundane, something that I could point to and say, I am the new Einstein, the Newton of the Millennium; and I am, of course, if I am right, but the theory takes more than it gives, for it eliminates entropy and with it the last vestiges of randomness and renders you...and me, irrelevant.  The last vengeance of love.

IF the exchange rate doesn’t change, it may seem like a purely arbitrary distinction, but it is not.

If the exchange is ct2 for ct2 as opposed to ct1 for ct1 in order to maintain separation you have a two part process and acceleration is through a slightly different mechanism.  To understand this we will look at both scenarios separately.

a)     CT3 movement=exchange of 6^6 ct2 states for every ct3 state at the speed of light.  This is a substitution of rate of 46656/256=182.25 for the speed of light for each quantum instant.   The first thing that occurs to someone looking at this is that there are no fractions in quantum change.  There is either 182 (slower than the speed of light) or 183 (faster than the speed of light) substitutions.   For the record, there are 46,656 ct2 compressed for each ct3. This suggests a maximum speed for wave energy which is less than photonic energy by a measurable amount.  The one attractive element of this analysis is that it accounts for the apparent interchange between photonic and wave light forms.  They “necessarily” exchange at every quantum instant, 182 photons exchanging every 1.07x10^-39^th of a second.  The “problem” is that this “slowing” would become pronounced at the levels that we observe wave energies.

b)     CT3 movement=exchange of 1 of every 256 ct1 states that make up the 6^6 ct1 states for every quantum ct3 state at the speed of light.  This allows the exchange rate to stay the same.  There are problems here that we experience, however.  One requires that we look further down the chain.

1.     At the ct3-ct4 interface we see a straight exchange of ct3 for ct4 (e=mc^2) at the speed of light.

2.     At the ct3-4 we also see the exchange of space for ct3 (i.e. the planet moving through space (or a rock) whether on earth or in empty space doesn’t lose its integrity even though it makes constant quantum jerks from one moment to the next (at the scale of 1.07x10^-39^th of a second.

3.     It appears that when you break down F-series you do so sequentially-i.e. ct5-c4, ct4 to ct3, ct3-ct2, ct2 to ct1 but that you can have simultaneous break downs of ct3 to ct2 along with ct4 to ct3 and that there is a reason for this, the reason being the uneven quality of the break down at quantum elements.  I.e. the 182.25 break down of ct3 to ct2 means that in a nuclear explosion (ct4-ct3 whether fusion or fission) you have imperfect exchange, fractional exchange, between ct4 and ct3 and this fraction forces part of the exchange to be (in a quantum instant) ct3 to ct2 in order to preserve the speed.  

4.     One can posit that the same unevenness is what causes ct3 and c2 to exchange because otherwise you’d have this .25 exchange discrepancy which is not allowed in a quantum universe.  What this means is that we should be able to measure a discrete and constant variation between photonic light and wave light as begin .25 per 46656 or 1:186,624 each 1.07x10-39^th of a second.

5.     We can extend this outward and we should see a similar breakdown at the ct4-ct3 level and we do.  The exchange there (100 million to 46,656) is 2143.347051 and the left over suggests a conversion of 1 photon per 288142292.5 with the .5 then being a secondary exchange.  You get the same type of breakdown even at the ct5-c6 interface 184467440737.10 with the .10 being the exchange to wave energy and that in turn would in all likelihood lead to a continued breakdown on down the chain.  There is a reason to be suspicious of these numbers not the least of which is that we’re working with a base 10 system and we know that the “base” system varies with the F-series not only because of the theoretical qualities but because of the observed measurements.

6.     Movement for different types of time occur at the same rate and since ct4 is 10^2^4 ct3 then this incredibly large number divided by 256 is the speed of matter at the speed of light and to see the quantum elements, you would have to observe those in fractions (1.07x10-39) of a second to see the individual changes.  Nevertheless, this should be   observable phenomena.

          The “conclusion” is that if we “move” from one quantum series to the next in the same way that we break down from one quantum series to the next then we’d see some very unusual transitions.  We’d see matter turning to wave energy, wave energy turning to photons and photons exchanging with ct1.  

          We cannot rule this out because at the quantum level matter (photons, electrons and Neutrons-not to mention quarks so we won’t mention them) behave strangely. In fact, electrons may be the “missing link” showing the exchange of ct4 to ct3 and the forces (electro-magnetic, strong and weak) may be the result of these exchanges at that level.

          The alternative is that there is a direction change of ct1-ct4 (for example) and this is possible but troublesome.  If movement was in this fashion, then it would seem more likely that you’d have a greater breakdown of the entire system because you’d have one break down (primary) for ct4-ct3 but you would have a secondary breakdown during the movement.  You would have dueling systems which would require to some extent dueling algorithms.

          However, discreet speed almost requires this direct exchange.  If you had intermediary breakdowns you’d have movement through space look like this:

          Ct4-ct3-ct2-ct1 at each quantum moment. 

          The discrete energy movements would be 46656 to 100 million simultaneous with 46656 to 256 movement simultaneous to 256 to 1 movement.  While at first we might “shy away” from such a bulky transition, such a transition at the quantum level would lead to a variety of simultaneous forces and we observe those simultaneous forces.  Let us count them: 3.  That would translate to strong, weak and electro-magnetic.  This system then actually matches observed phenomena.  Gravity, of course is the ct0-ct1 force which is, more to the point the force that results from stacking ct states.  Hence this complicated transition is consistent with what is observed whether through coincidence or actual reflection.

The second edition is well under way