AuT-ppp Pre Calculus

Every once in a while I get a good question.  The one that I have received recently is this, "How is order determined, and why does it force light, waves, matter and black holes to travel sequentially.'
The short answer is that with ct1 you have to trace it back through the chain, but with higher ct states you have overlapping chains that vary the order of solution although they still have to sequentially move as they come together or separate.  You can see that in this old pic, but we'll get some additional detail.

We will get to that in more detail, but before we do, it is important to know what the answer means, otherwise it looks too simple.
One good thing about AuT is that it allows us to look at g-space were true mathematics lives free of the confines of space-time and the haunting illusions of entropy and self-determination and that most misleading of all illusions, faith.

The evolution of a state from non-linear to linear is generally represented, using zero prime as:

0’=0’1/1+0’1/(4-1)  Since 0’ oscillates between 1 and negative 1 in quantum instances, this is very similar to 1-1/3 but it is not.

Zero, in g-space can be replaced with (-1)^(x+1)

This also, of course, means that, part, [0’1/1+0’1/(4-1)]=(-1)^(2)+(-1)^3=0. What this tells us is that for any finite value of x, 0’=0 when summed.  This is misleading, however, in the same way that limit mathematics (as x approaches zero you get a mathematically specific result) is fraught with errors.

This tautology (0=0') while seemingly innocent is actually quite important and indicates that an offset is required in order to prevent the universe from collapsing in on itself and that the offset is inherent in the value of 0’ and is the converging series that powers AuT..

But o-space begins long before this issue is raised.
The first question has to be, what is plus.  We assume the most important parts of this equation are a given, but in truth they are as important to resolve as those which we understand. 
Another problem with o-space mathematics is that it fails to recognize super symmetry which eliminates randomness and entropy in their entirety.  
It is stuck in a space time analysis with self determination and its evil twin faith.
Let's look at some o-space parts of these equations that we take for granted but which are fraught with hidden meaning.

Plus is a relative position of states. 1 plus 1 does not create anything.  If you look at a simplified version of the drawing above you see the sum of the two states generates a third, but the prior two have not vanished although their importance as the top solutions are greatly reduced.  In the drawing below, you have to go from the right side all the way down to where e begins before you can begin to move up the chain to where c appears and hence the two solutions to the left and right side of A are far apart, whereas the solutions between D and C are close but it is based on the order of the solutions and their relationship to history going back to the lower solution of E where things began for this group.

Likewise, Equals identifies a quantum solution, but that solution is only significant in a given location by its solution relative to all points.

Since all points are ultimately sequential solutions to 0’; 0' must incorporate the algorithm and is the only solution that exists.  The plus gives relative positions in terms of a quantum solution based on the perspective.

Spiral value is governed by the equation

[(n=(n-1)+(n-2)]

pi=n(sum(1 to x)[(-1)^(x+1)]/(2x-1)

0’=(-1)^(x+1)

Pi=sum(1 to n)n(sum 1 to x)[0’/(2x-1)

This is one of the more rough post sets although its the most important in many ways.  It will largely reconcile non-linear quantum calculus with what we're used to working with in a linear (non-quantum) universe; but it's confusing even to me in places so bear with me and don't judge till you get to the end.

Dual limits:
xapproaches zero from right x-x0+; right hand limit or from leftx-x0-
In the case of NLC the answers were the same.  But this isn't the case in AuT and in fact there is a question as to whether the past can be approached from the future event because there is nothing built and having built from the past, the changes that occurred to keep the future sold might be impossible to track backwards.  This is not so much a jump discontinuity where the limit from either side exists, it may be where the limit only exists from one side which would help explain why history only goes in one direction.

Another place where this issue comes up has to do with the inflection points.
limit as x-0 for 1/x is infinity; but x is finite at any point so that infinity isn't reached in the universe.  The limit as x approaches infinity from the negative position is negative infinity and this is a balanced equation that may have relevance with positive and negative spirals which do grow out in both directions towards infinity but achieve a quite different result because of their intersection.

This is the first application of calculus to the overall problem and it's pretty messy at this stage of development.  

These features are reasons WHY AUT ARRIVEs AT DIFFERENT SOLUTIONS THAN CALCULUS.

We will get to that in the next posts, perhaps or perhaps this will be the last post.  Who really know?
I have no more faith in this than you do.