Pages

Tuesday, December 6, 2016

Aut Lumpy time 4-Slowing down

The real meat of this series comes around Lumpy time 7 where curvature is explained as being both orbital and quantum.  That section also shows the first derivation of force (heat) in terms of relativistic elements in a non-linear environment.  However, it would be less satisfying to put everything in one place or post these too quickly; at least before the publication of the second volume of spirals in Amber.  I do expect this book, like each of the others to be a quantum step and while there are certain to be errors and even chapters that should have been deleted, it is important to note that this interferes with my day job (or vice-versa) and that is your fault, not mine.

Aut Lumpy time 4-Slowing down


 Up till now we have concentrated on light speed transitions.  1:256 is lightspeed.  2:256 would be faster than light speed (by a factor of 2) and so on.  1:512 would be an achievable half of light speed.  That is we can achieve these speeds in a laboratory setting; actually in an accelerator.
This can occur no matter how the transitions occur, but the analysis will allow that at some level it comes down to assuming transitions occur only within one system (ct1 for ct4; and not ct1 for ct2, ct2 for ct3, ct3 for ct4) or that matter can exchange directly with space at least from an observed perspective.  If you are having a hard time accepting this, you are right.  To understand this we have to look at a different exchange, ct5 (black holes).  This must have some “force” change.  Certainly something weird happens.  The K-physics “surrendered” and said that black holes dropped out of the universe.  AuT analysis recognized the EHT analysis prevented this result which actually led to the current understanding.
This looks like: ct5-ct4-ct3-ct2-ct1 exchange.
This is 186 billion to one exchange just between 1 black hole state and one ct4 state which has an exchange rate of 288 million to one with energy.  The result suggests that black holes must “slow down” due to the number of relative quantum exchanges with ct1 and in fact this is what we see as the shrinking of space time at black holes and is also the reason for the increased gravity which has to be a relativistic effect of stacking relative locations to ct1 at the transition.
Likewise there is another force added at the ct5-ct4 exchange and we do not experience this force at all.  Since this force is only at the ct5-4 exchange we can no more experience that force than we could experience the strong and weak forces in energy where it has no place.
 These transitions would occur where the same a single ct1 exchanges with two different groups of ct4 transitions per 256.  Again, this is a discrete change.  It is hard to observe only because of the scale at which it happens.  A single quantum slow down would be 256/46565 for photon to wave and we have these interchanging which further complicates the analysis.  
At the level where we “see” things, ct4, the smallest possible transitions are 256/4,665,600,000,000 ct1 transitions just at the ct4-ct3 interchange.  If you accelerate matter to the speed of light then every 256 matters you 1 ct1 interchange or, for a quantum secont you have 18,225,000,000 ct1 exchanges.  Theoretically you can change from this to 18,224,999,999 ct1 exchanges but I believe the better number is 18,225,000,000-256 or 18,224,999,744 changes per quantum instant.
To understand this better it works like this:
1:256 is photon at the speed of light.
Then you have transitions between waves which are 1 ct3 per 46,656 per photon.
Finally, you have the 1:100,000,000 ct4 per wave.
That is the discreet change between speeds is 256/6.6656x10^11 per 1.07x10-39th of a second.  While discrete, this change in speed is not easily observable.  Further, the theorized breakdowns between other states due to fractional transitions would further cloud the analysis.

What’s important is that if you fire a bullet, it doesn’t slow down according to a linear function, it slows according to a discrete quantum formula.  While this analysis may fail for one reason or another, the basic underlying concept remains.

No comments:

Post a Comment