Pages

Sunday, September 1, 2013

Black holes infinite series ehologram

http://m.nbcnews.com/science/milky-ways-giant-black-hole-spits-out-its-food-8C11034082


Chapter 108:   

Perhaps, by now, you are whining about the difficulty in observing time.  It incorporates tendencies to give matter dimension and to propel it from the singularity.



We do see a reflection of quantum time in our study of (search for) gravitons.  The search for this missing (and irrelevant in hologram theory) particle takes us ever smaller.  Instead we can look for the hologram equivalent (time) which will never see it based on distance because time gives the appearance of dimension to tendencies and by itself has not connection with space.  Time is space and holds tendencies or carries them out.


The most obvious place to find time (at least by its absence) is in black holes where it is stripped off or recoiled.  Since the reduction of time into the singularity is considered in the nature an infinite series, it is hard to get it to happen, so much of the matter which tends towards giving up time migrates or is rejuvenated in the radiations from those objects.  This theoretical observation (check the timing on the published blogs and the wall street journal article on the observation) was recently observed.


Temporary black holes (if they really exist and are not something else) might also yield clues to the nature of time.  The good news is that time is all around us.  It's not like the elusive dark matter or Higgs Bosons.  If you are reading this, the distance between the print and your eye is a function of the time difference between the time attached to the computer screen and the time in your retina that is picking it up.  Likewise, if we are in the singularity as appears likely (that is all time and therefore all dimension is merely an illusion in the singularity) then there is not real distance or dimension there, but instead some feature of time causes the appearance of separation and this appearance can be manipulated and there is evidence that it is manipulated in the universe.

 

While there are some arguments for this on earth, all black holes lead back to the same singularity.  This means faster than light travel (apparent) occurs at every black hole all the time which renders faster than light travel pretty ho-hum in our universe. 

 

If you have (as you do) black holes separated by a million light years, then travel a million times faster than light happens constantly within the known universe.  What could be more boring than that!  Here we are complaining about how long it takes to get to the moon or mars when black holes make a much longer trip instantly!



The foundation for this hologram theory of time was laid down in the 1930's and 40's.  Hence while it might be called new Hologram theory (compared to old hologram theory developed in the 1990's which is still stuck on strings and space-time and looking smaller and smaller and expecting to find something there and perplexed that Planck is mathematically right and observationally wrong).  This inconsistency is only appropriate given ancient-new hologram theory's foundation (Einstein started it so it is called E-H theory. since it being both younger and older than new hologram theory makes just conceptualizing it sort of nauseating).

 

While the theory is based on throwing everything out with the dishwater except for time and a singularity, in fact all of the math in other theories applies to E-H Theory or E-H Theory is not valid. 

 

E-Hologram theory is more religious and spiritual in nature since time travel, seeing into the future, faster than light travel, manipulation of the singularity through thought and even past lives is almost axiomatic in E-H theory.  Likewise, it readily lends itself to some concept of deity since as we move deeper into the singularity we discover that it is something which has no time or dimension as we experience it but has the ability (at least once you add a drop or two of time) of being as big as all creation and everything happens at once.

No comments:

Post a Comment