While there are sections concerning equivalents between E-H Theory and Hologram theory, a detailed examination of the differences has not been done.
This is the first of a series of entries to begin this process. It is not as detailed as it should be, but will be developed over 3 separate entries.
The main difference, in fact the fundamental difference is the treatment of time in the two theories. The treatment of time succinctly has been relegated to non-universe examinations which will be addressed later in a separate set of entries. You can click on the picture below to link to books by the author including the e-hologram universe.
In Hologram and other post-relativity (post Einstein) theories, the focus is on space-time which uses our perception as a canvas much as Newtonian science did and therefore is unduly restrictive. This prevents the elimination (before E-H theory) of space.
Space time sees three dimensions (without explaining how they exist) and time as a fourth dimension. In e-hologram theory, the irrelevance of dimensions other than time is foundational. Generally, this means that you could travel along any of the 4 dimensions and get the same effect (i.e. time plus 3) and we happen to be traveling along the dimension we call time. This concept works fairly well with E-H theory since "awareness" time could go along any of the four, but it poorly explains what we experience outside of a mathematical model.
In order for hologram theory to function (as opposed to e-hologram theory); you are stuck with space and time. This incorrectly (theoretically incorrectly) forces the math to look for dimensions. Thus in hologram theory, you have to have a projection onto three dimension from a two dimensional framework and time is taken for granted (always a mistake). This means you are not really explaining anything, you're just eliminating one variable and forcing it to appear somewhere else. Less this seem like an attack on Hologram theory, it isn't. E-H theory is called E-H theory as a theoretical and poorly developed outgrowth from Hologram theory. Nor is it an attach on Einstein's space time. Instead it take the strengths of Einstein's non-hologram theory comments on time and hologram's projection mathematics and combines them to come up with something less than a projection and the elimination of a greater number of variables without completely explaining how time causes those variables to exist. For a more complete discussion of this you can see the first edition of The Einstein Hologram Theory.
Likewise, because space (dimension) continues to be forced on the examiner in hologram theory, you have all these different black holes which can be divided (theoretically one can split from another), they can be temporary, and they can be spread out going to some mysterious and poorly defined location. The idea that black holes go to the same place, is not entirely new. The idea of traveling from one spot in the universe to another by going through a black hole dates almost back to the modeling of black holes themselves (even though with space time it would tear you to pieces). But this has never been defined in understandable terms. The ideas were mainly couched in terms of misunderstood quasars where the idea was that black holes would empty you out of a quasar at some location. Likewise, traditional mathematics (as opposed to science fiction) held that you might go to a different dimension, perhaps one where the dinosaurs were not wiped out (by a meteor or otherwise) and they became the dominate life form; or perhaps one where you were born to rich parents instead of poor ones, perhaps to your misfortune.
However, all of these concepts accepted "space-time" as a given and even if you traveled through a black hole without being ripped to pieces you would go to some "dimensional" environment. E-H theory scoffs at that just like you might scoff at E-H theory. All black holes "go" to the same place because they are just a re-winding of time coordinates for the applicable matter/space/energy involved. In fact, this is observed recently (and after e-h theory I'm happy to point out). We see black holes that "reject" 90% or more of the material that comes in, ejecting them as energy. This is similar to the theory of how light is "slowed" by absorbtion and re-emission as a dimensional re-setting which is described in E-H theory first edition. When science shows what is inherent in a theory, it is always gratifying, but more importantly in justifies a deeper examination of the theory.
I will have to continue this discussion later; for more on this, you may want to compare the book to this treatise http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2013/06/new-theories-of-space-time-laws-of-physics-for-a-holographic-universe.html or just wait for the next blog entry on this subject.
No comments:
Post a Comment