Can anyone take NLT seriously except as a math exercise? NLT is disturbing mathematically and by viture of the transitive or transferative properties of speech of those who understand it best that a pre-ordained universe seems to be mandated.
If Einstein had said "the only reason for ice in my water is so it will be cold," you would understand that without ice the water would not be cold. This is the transitive property that carries over in so many different instances that mandate pre-destination and non-linear time.
NLT is built on a particular type of hell. It is a universe where the driving forces seem to be pathos and schadenfreude. If the choices we make, whether pre-ordained or not, we make them, are fixed in eternity, how can we live knowing that the mistakes we've already made will be made forever. And how can I recognize the nature of the universe and still make the same mistakes over and over. Every day I wake up and I make the same mistakes? Perhaps a universe based on pathos would explain some things. The love that is so strong you always know it is there even before you find it and which wrenches your gut forever when it is lost. Could some forms of love could be so strongly embedded in the fibers of a NLT universe that they could bleed over and resurface again and again? And who would set up a universe where we deny ourselves the right thing every time we wake up?
But back to NLT and the section on Creation. When we last left it we were a CT(1), now it is time to move on to CT(2)
Originally it made sense that all times would compress at the same rate, with a c-squared scale, just as matter turns into energy, a 10 to the 16th power. Of course there was no reason for this other than consistency.
Also, originally, black holes were not looked at as the next step in compression, a source of CT5 as it were. Instead it was gravity, a CT1 phenomena succeeding.
However, the continued analysis of the two sides began to yield troubling results.
First, the scale of matter involved in black holes was extremely high, on the scale of the square of the energy. On further analysis looking at the exponential growth, it became apparent that with exponential growth of the power of scale, that you achieved the results envisioned starting at zero and working your way up to the matter energy number, but you still had the photon space to energy space compression at a factor of 8 which is sufficiently smaller than the very small energy to mass equation to make it possible to get below Plank lengths and there were 6 more decimal places to get to ct(0) making the entire process logically connected to non-linear time going linear in an exponential way as one Clock time compressed to give rise to linearity in the next.
2) CT(2) goes linear and we have the expansion of the universe into two dimensions. Space can now form, but is so concentrated that it exists only in two dimensions. The corresponding force is a one directional force which is theorized to be photonic. It is unlikely that two sets of coordinates go linear at the same time. These two coordinate states (CT1 and CT2) are invisible to us if we look only at 3 dimensions, but should be observable from our vantage point. It is the first place where a divide is possible and things can be in two separate places. There is no ability here for a traditional explosion because everything is restricted into a single plane, but there is no reason why force vectors cannot extend in an infinite circle just as you can draw an infinite number of lines outward from a point on a sheet of paper. This would be a big bang in 2 dimensions. CT1 points are used to create CT(2) vectors and later conversions indicate that 10^4 is the “conversion ratio” of points in CT1 to vectors in CT2 using the sequential acceleration concept above. This is predicted.
If Einstein had said "the only reason for ice in my water is so it will be cold," you would understand that without ice the water would not be cold. This is the transitive property that carries over in so many different instances that mandate pre-destination and non-linear time.
NLT is built on a particular type of hell. It is a universe where the driving forces seem to be pathos and schadenfreude. If the choices we make, whether pre-ordained or not, we make them, are fixed in eternity, how can we live knowing that the mistakes we've already made will be made forever. And how can I recognize the nature of the universe and still make the same mistakes over and over. Every day I wake up and I make the same mistakes? Perhaps a universe based on pathos would explain some things. The love that is so strong you always know it is there even before you find it and which wrenches your gut forever when it is lost. Could some forms of love could be so strongly embedded in the fibers of a NLT universe that they could bleed over and resurface again and again? And who would set up a universe where we deny ourselves the right thing every time we wake up?
But back to NLT and the section on Creation. When we last left it we were a CT(1), now it is time to move on to CT(2)
Originally it made sense that all times would compress at the same rate, with a c-squared scale, just as matter turns into energy, a 10 to the 16th power. Of course there was no reason for this other than consistency.
Also, originally, black holes were not looked at as the next step in compression, a source of CT5 as it were. Instead it was gravity, a CT1 phenomena succeeding.
However, the continued analysis of the two sides began to yield troubling results.
First, the scale of matter involved in black holes was extremely high, on the scale of the square of the energy. On further analysis looking at the exponential growth, it became apparent that with exponential growth of the power of scale, that you achieved the results envisioned starting at zero and working your way up to the matter energy number, but you still had the photon space to energy space compression at a factor of 8 which is sufficiently smaller than the very small energy to mass equation to make it possible to get below Plank lengths and there were 6 more decimal places to get to ct(0) making the entire process logically connected to non-linear time going linear in an exponential way as one Clock time compressed to give rise to linearity in the next.
2) CT(2) goes linear and we have the expansion of the universe into two dimensions. Space can now form, but is so concentrated that it exists only in two dimensions. The corresponding force is a one directional force which is theorized to be photonic. It is unlikely that two sets of coordinates go linear at the same time. These two coordinate states (CT1 and CT2) are invisible to us if we look only at 3 dimensions, but should be observable from our vantage point. It is the first place where a divide is possible and things can be in two separate places. There is no ability here for a traditional explosion because everything is restricted into a single plane, but there is no reason why force vectors cannot extend in an infinite circle just as you can draw an infinite number of lines outward from a point on a sheet of paper. This would be a big bang in 2 dimensions. CT1 points are used to create CT(2) vectors and later conversions indicate that 10^4 is the “conversion ratio” of points in CT1 to vectors in CT2 using the sequential acceleration concept above. This is predicted.
Photons
can be said to require movement in at least two dimensions to exist.
While it is arguable that photons can only combine in at least two
dimensions, it is likely that dimensional coordinates exist without
clock time (CT not SCT) in multiple dimensions since two dimensional
photons can move throughout three dimensional space.
CT(0)dt=(CT(0)+CT(1)+CT(2))dt. Coordinate change is always
conserved. 1
1
Again,
a function is suggested for CT(1) ((CT(t)dt=t^n^2)*(x+t) +
(t^n^2)*(t’^n^2)*(x-t) where x is one of three dimensional
coordinate changes, t is gravitational force time and t’ is
photonic force time, the equation requiring solution for all three
dimensions. Since this formulation is not complete, is for NLT and
not linear space, its history is not tracked for subsequent
linearity steps.
No comments:
Post a Comment