The spiral universe is a lonely place, but I watch my old movies, I read my old books, and I wonder why I am held back by an ironic universe, what purpose can it have for this other than for me to finish this work? That is, of course, too self centered. Instead is my unwillingness to take advantage of the illusion of self determination without an excuse.
I have sought many an excuse and continue to do so. It makes things which are not completely necessary conditional, like the finishing of this work, the success of an application, the agreement to undertake and undertaking, the ability to transition with some sense of innocence.
However, I am not innocent. I have not been innocent for a long time and it is a travesty for me to seek absolution with so much blood on my hands.
Even as a young person, before I was a man, I was guilty of murdering friendships for selfish motives. My intent is irrelevant, the outcome whether from incompetence or inexperience was the same, blood on my hands, over the years, coating the old blood always fresh. And it continues, the blood no sooner dries than I add a fresh coat and even now, trading friendships for my needs, consuming them as a forest fire consumes trees.Enough! I still love, but my movements leave a trail of pain, my heart is a mirror, wearing the scars of every heart I have sundered.
Fear me, the consumer of souls; consuming them without even trying, often without knowing, as if I was led by an unknown, poorly understood instinct.
Perhaps that is my theory, a static universe, consuming everyone's soul at once, as if the crime of one soul, one friendship at a time is not enough.
CT2-NLC a spiral explanation of the one source universe
The spiral can only compress one coordinate per quantum space which means that the initial compression can only be compression of a scale of 1, 2^1 (one data point) to 2^2 (two data points).
This compression continues as the solution to the equation y=2^x as x increases linearly in whole numbers (0,1,2,3, etc). Gravity, is the force corresponding to y=2^0=1. All points
Negative time is the decrease linearly from zero -1,-2,etc which suggests the theoretical solution- ½; ¼;1/8th;1/16th;etc. This is significant because the use of negative numbers outside of the result (by having it as a factor) eliminates some problems that will be addressed in the section below regarding time dilation which is seen, especially at the ct1-ct0 and ct4-ct5 event horizons. *It remains the principle of NLC that time is illusional and that each quantum time continues to co-exist with each other quantum time. Dimensional and force characteristics experienced in any quantum time are a function of the interplay between one fixed quantum time point and the prior and following quantum point times. The total amount of information remains constant, but the exact arrangement changes based on fixed quantum changes at different locations in the algorithm based spiral.*
CT(2) goes linear: This is the next step in compression. In the first edition (the Einstein Hologram Universe), it was theorized that this might be the first time when we would have “the expansion of the universe into two dimensions.” *Under NLC all expansion occurs initially and only compression follows for both time and dimension. However the idea of spirals coming off of the primary spiral suggests that a form of multiple linearity actually can occur with each successive stage of compression. As such you have a master spiral the size of the universe (in increments of quantum length) and sub spirals whose length is governed by the amount of “time” they exist. For example, certain such spirals might last almost as long as the universe, some of these inner ct2 quantum energy spirals, while others, fusing and this fissioning, like those at Hiroshima, might last a considerably shorter period of time and have a shorter length as a result. This model helps to explain why it is more difficult to have conversions of the fundamental spirals, they are necessarily so long that altering them or converting them would require acting on a long, fixed spiral, something impossible for anything without actual self-determination which we are denied by virtue of the physics of the spiral universe. The continuing compression required by the spiral means that as the center approaches, more and more compression is a necessity and the spirals will become more permanent.
This, then, gives us the first one source model of the universe (suggested by the interchangeability of energy and matter) where that source is information (time coordinates, c) and where the display algorithm is a series of compressing spirals running in a single direction which explains why the universe appears in motion even though the theory holds that everything exists within a fixed singularity without dimension (or time) and that the spirals are merely a function of the display of apparent linearity.*
After the “Great Spiral”, in NLT, at least, there is the initial “moment” moving along the Great Spiral when two time coordinates are forced together as r (the radius of the spiral) decreases incrementally and CT(2) goes linear, *as a spiral off the spiral for a combination of two data points caused by the decrease of one quantum distance along the Great Spiral as it spirals down to complete singularity where all data points are changing together where all of the spirals have come back to the singularity*. There is no “additional time” generated, at least not of necessity. All the time in the singularity continues to exist there.
If “space” is CT(1), then it would be wrong to say that “…space can now form, but is so concentrated that it exists only in two dimensions because only two of the three dimensional coordinates are changing at once.” However, it is likely that if linearity starts at a moment, then there could be a moment when this situation would exist.
*Illusory Vibration could come from looking forward from a quantum moment and looking backwards from a quantum moment. Looking forward would generate one set of phenomena, dimensional characteristics, looking backwards, another, force set of phenomena from the perspective of the quantum point of observation.*
On feature of the algorithm for displaying fixed information which is reflected in the equations identified as CT2 is that two coordinates can change at once because of the shared space along the spiral and the related compression of data (ct1-2^1 to ct2-2^2). This allows for exponentially greater information to be displayed at the one point where ct2 occurs over ct1.
It is theorized that the traditional view of the coordinates as being along separate axis is incorrect. This requires a view of dimensions where the expression of change and not dimension occurs. For example, as information from a data source is processed, it can, by virtue of the process, be displayed as anything, color, sound, or picture for example. The variation is controlled by the mechanism by which the fixed information is displayed. If we are only looking at one “bit” at a time (2^1) there is a minimum amount of information that can be displayed. If two bits are processed at once (2^2) then the corresponding amount of information is exponentially greater, but the total amount of information is unvaried.
The information is fixed in a singularity without dimension. An algorithm expresses the information in a form that appears to be along a spiral (viewed from within the spiral of information). The purpose of the algorithm is to give a beginning and an end to the information just as a movie plays from beginning to end. Unlike a traditional movie, this one varies in complexity from a state of complete disorganization, back to a state of complete organization. This does not, however, affect the singularity, but is only a method of expressing it.
It is therefore as predictable as physics that a given outcome will occur, there is no potential for varying the movie unless the singularity is varied in the primary embodiment. In the earlier embodiment, however, it was speculated that the spiral could vary, even to the point of varying the shape of the spiral, which would allow for different incomes based on a set amount of data. This alternative view is worth considerable attention because it would provide that the information can be expressed using different algorithms to give different result even in a universe where the amount of information is finite. (The exact amount of information is estimated later, but is a function of the total gravity of the universe, each quantum of time/gravity/data-interchangeable references to the same thing) totaling to the total amount of information.
Information at any point along the spiral can be discussed in terms of the nature of “x” as a function of the equation x=2^n. In this equation, so far, as n starts as 1, x is represented by nothing other than space. The amount of x, x(tot) has a cognizable amount of gravity in our current universe because the transition from x=2^0 to x=2^1 is viewed as the point where gravity is created. Since all the information is available at any point along the spiral irregardless of combination or compression, the total amount of gravity and the total amount of change are unvaried as the spiral moves is followed inward.
Again, while we can envision mathematically a spiral algorithm, actual movement is absent. Also, X(tot) never changes. This means that the amount of combination must match the increased amount of change possible in order that nothing be invented or lost. One can imagine information being lost from the spiral, but one cannot imagine information being lost from a singularity. Since the spiral is only a formula for expressing linearity from an singularity without linearity no information is lost unless the “rules of the spiral” say it is lost and there is no basis for such a determination.
For this reason, we can change the exponential rate of change at any point along the spiral, but whatever is the stuff of the singularity, the total amount of change, the total stuff, remains constant. What changes is the number of coordinates of X that can change simultaneously at a rate corresponding to compression but equalling the change before compression at any one point along the primary spiral.
For those who don’t think the evidence supports the spiral algorithm (circles, string theory, spirals within spirals in the universe, the seeming progression of pi, time and compression) remember that it is merely one algorithm. The pi, infinite series algorithm which is used herein is vibrational in nature as it moves inexorably towards a solution based on a sum total of information and it is nice to have that type of solution when dimensional and force characteristics appear to be two sides of a similar equation (one the plus, the other the minus) or to each have the aspects of the plus and minus portions. Indeed, the existence of time quanta on either side of the present appears to hold evidence of the vibrational nature of the solution. But you don’t have to like it, it doesn’t have to exist, there is some algorithm, but it remains possible (doubtfully so in a physics driven universe) that there is even a series of different algorithms, but that would require a change in physics along the way and even the possibility of some form of randomness which is counterintuitive to an Einstein, everything happens at once, universe.
More important, perhaps, is the equation which governs the “pre” and “post” change components.
Compression:
X(current)=X(future - change in compression) =X(past+change in compression) The perceived changes in either direction are critical to our “perceived” self determination.
Therefore x(tot) if all of x is ct0=xct0 but it becomes x(tot)=+xct1+xct2+xct3 when some of x is of a ct1 or higher state. Also x(tot)=xct0+xc1+xc2 in the situation discussed in this section where ct2 has gone linear if some information is lost from the spiral, but xct(0) should be zero, that is no information is lost back to the singularity until all of the information has returned to non-linearity at perfect compression.
Transition
X(current)=x(past) + (xchange)=x(future)-x(change)
The “position” of x can be anywhere (along the spiral) and the only change is in the state of x relative to how many bits of information in x can change at once for each point along the primary spiral. Further, you can determine where you are on the spiral by the amount of combination since one combination occurs at each point along the spiral.
Because x does not change, and because of observed phenomena discussed below, it also must be that x is conserved, so as one coordinate change is added (as n increase in the function 2^n) the total rate of change over the universe should remain the same meaning that each “bit” or coordinate has to change slower.
Getting to the original point, we like to think in terms of dimensions, but the actual dimensions appear to be misleading. While things move in 3 dimensions the change that leads to this appears to occur in coordinates without reference to a specific dimension or location. We know that standard clock time is no different than any other coordinate change, but we also know that because of conservation of coordinate change that clock time slows as other, non-clock coordinate changes increase in rate.
Force
The corresponding force for CT2 is a one directional force which is theorized to be photonic. It is likely that two sets of coordinates go linear at the same time which allows for a one directional force for the first time. This is not a time based force, but is positional. The force arises from the perceived movement from a point in the spiral in either direction, but if at the point of origin, the force merges with the “space” spiral, the so-called primary spiral, and ceases to be determinable.
These two time coordinate states (CT1 and CT2) are visible to us, but we don’t understand what we are seeing unless we understand what we are looking act. Space, for example, appears invisible, even though it represents the same informational change along the spiral as the more “solid” informational changes. It is the first place where a divide is possible and things can exist in two separate places, remembering that only the “change” is visible or even relevant to other linear entities. Without the perspective of movement along the spiral, existence would be static. Space has no dimensional movement, for example, and therefore appears empty even though it is made dof the same coordinates as everything else.
If we are to assume that a time period exists where only ct1 and ct2 exist, then during this period there is no ability for a traditional explosion because everything is restricted into a single line, but there is no reason why force vectors cannot extend in an infinite circle just as you can draw an infinite number of lines outward from a point on a sheet of paper. This would be a big bang in 2 dimensions and is covered immediately following in a short section on running the spiral in reverse.
CT1 points are used to create CT(2) vectors and later conversions indicate that 10^2 is the “conversion ratio” or “compression ratio” of points in CT1 to vectors in CT2 using the sequential acceleration concept above. This is predicted in the concept of “exponential compression.”
Next, of course, will come ct(2) vectors to ct(3) waves having a compression factor of 10^4.
Photons (ct2) are point forces and are theorized to be connected to CT2 going negative, that is the process of looking back along the spiral. This is not actual movement, but is, instead, the perception of the prior quantum time along the vector which is a point environment (ct1) as only one time coordinate at a time can change and compression is represented by 10^1. This pattern which continues is the strongest indicator that forces are a negative, a reflection of the lower clock times.
DIMENSION IN A NON-DIMENSION ENVIRONMENT
Gravity moves only along the primary spiral and has no dimensional features that we observe just as space has no dimensional features that we observe despite both being present on the spiral algorithm.
Photons can be said to require movement in at least two dimensions to exist. While it is arguable that photons can only combine in at least two dimensions, it is likely that dimensional coordinates exist without clock time (CT not SCT) in multiple dimensions since two dimensional photons can move throughout three dimensional space. CT(0)dt=(CT(0)+CT(1)+CT(2))dt. This suggests that changes, coordinate changes function as multi-dimensional features in the algorithm.
This is the most difficult feature of multi dimensional coordinate change that exists. One coordinate changing at a time makes sense with 3 dimensions, but what about ct4, 5, etc where changes are occurring at a point in 3 dimensional space, but in more than 3 coordinates at once? The two obvious choices are that they change in those other dimensions, but we cannot see them (which leaves questions about HOW those changes affect the conserved speed of change) or the more likely alternative that they can only change in one dimension for ct1, only 2 for ct2, etc; but that the universe changes around them in the other coordinates where they would otherwise be fixed. This is a function of the algorithm which creates the illusion of a projection of different features of the Einstein singularity.
Photons are one dimensional force aspects and it can be seen that “force aspects” of space-time trail one dimension behind “spatial aspects.” This is the idea of CT1 going negative to form photonic energy and CT0 going negative to form gravitational energy. Using the fixed spiral model these are forces that represent the change in position from one quantum length along the “primary spiral” to the next. Wave energies will be movement along both the primary and secondary spirals, of course, with the total movement along both being equal to one move along the primary spiral but of multiple data points on different spirals. None of the spirals can double back but spirals can rise and fall against the next lower spiral.
Coordinate change is always conserved. Again, a function is suggested for CT(1) taken to the next state, ct(2):
((CT(t)dt=t^n^2)*(x+t) + (t^n^2)*(t’^n^2)*(x-t)
In spiral terms
Spiral(total change)=SC(1) + SC(2)*2^2. For higher states you’d have + SC(3)*2^4 etc where each spiral change is the distance equation along the spiral which you’ll find in prior posts. The idea is that each SC(x+1) comes off of and parallels the lower state spiral, but in quantity exponentially greater (2^n+1) than the lower state.
***In the CT equation x is one of three dimensional coordinate changes, t is gravitational force time and t’ is photonic force time, the equation requiring solution for all three dimensions. In the SC example, SC is the spiral equation and you’re just looking at positional changes along the spiral where dimensions are not relevant.
In either, there can be a negative state generated as force and a positive state generated as a type of point in the universe. In the Coordinate Change example this is the x-t equation, but in the SC equation the forces are all static and it’s a perspective question. The force equation could be either be incorporated (no negative equation) or SC(F)=SC2-SC(1)*½. The problem with having forces as incorporated lies in the problem of gravity. Gravity pulls towards non-linearity, it suggests that gravity is the tendency to move backwards on the spiral, and the other forces, if related, should be the tendency to move backwards along other spirals off the primary spiral each being proportionately (exponentially) because of the amount of compression in the movement. For reasons that will be clear from the discussion, it is harder to reverse gravity because it is on the primary spiral. The lesser spirals allow movement according to relative slowing of one coordinate in favor of another (apparent dimensional movement) while along the primary spiral no such relative coordinate change is possible because only one coordinate changes at a time preventing even illusory time change although, presumably, negative gravity would result in time travel.
The problem with the earlier analysis of information is that it doesn’t hold true, at least not in an obvious way. Ct0 as movement in a negative state is gravity, ct1 in its negative state is photonic. Ct1 in its positive state is space. Ct2 in its positive state would have to have some separate existence which is not observed. If forced at gun-point to give it such a designation, I would probably say it is an altered “space” state that allows for photonic energy to exist and is not observed separately from space. There are reasons to believe (as set out in the section on time dilation) that even matter might fall into this categorization.
Since this formula is not complete, its history is not tracked here for subsequent linearity steps (ct3, ct4, etc).Every transition from one state to the next must occur at a quantum moment because one spiral has to leave the prior spiral at that point.
No comments:
Post a Comment