Sunday all over again, puppets, physics and I lost in time (edited)

This post has been substantially rewritten and added to the 5th edition of book 3
Am i really so out of touch that I am confusing saturday and sunday?  obviously the answer is yes.  It was a busy couple of days.
I have been thinking so much about you, it is something of a miracle that I haven't walked into more walls that I have.  That, however, will have to wait.

AuT goes beyond prior theories in many ways, covered in the books in detail and one of the prior posts in 12 snippets.  It eliminates the need for unifying principles although it shows how unification would occur.

It shows a world which is independent of time and with dimensions which vary according to the needs of the underlying mathematical solutions.

Now I have undertaken, having reached a point of some certainty as to the basic principles, where I am seeking to find a way of practical utilization of the science that operates below the level that we experience and which controls us as opposed to us controlling it.  The whole idea is difficult to imagine, it is the idea of the puppet somehow manipulating the puppeteer.

A discussion of the plasma reaction:
Looking at articles like this one might hold some clues, but what is the issue here?
Phys.org: No more zigzags: Scientists uncover mechanism that stabilizes fusion plasmas. https://phys.org/news/2018-07-zigzags-scientists-uncover-mechanism-stabilizes.html

Trying to reconcile this with AuT is not too difficult.

The drawing on the left above shows the source of the sawtooth gyrations.  Since many ct1 states have long periods of stability, you'll have times when gyrations don't happen for a while (see a mechanism that has long puzzled physicists).

So these scientists see a result and call it: "magnetic flux pumping."

The article discusses "light elements in the form of plasma":

It forms a good platform for showing how pre-AuT theory and AuT differ.

Plasma is given features and this is important in understanding what is wrong with the analysis:

hot:  Heat is movement.  Hence in a quantum environment it does not exist. Over large values of x, changes such as those shown on the left are viewed as heat as structures lose their stability due to ct1 alignment degrading.  This occurs at the ct3 state typically manifested in ct3-ct4 transition states although as they break down the do so as radiation, ct3 and some ct2 states.  Figur 45 in Book 3 (fifth edition) shows this.

Element 1 charged: This is also a change over time towards compression or decompression but at the ct2-ct3 transition.  

Element 2 free electrons:  These are ct4 transitional states, currently considered odd stage states (ct4-7)

Element 3 atomic nuclei: These are primarily protons (ct4-8 states presumably)

and Element 4 "generates massive amounts of energy"  which is the radiation given off by the various states and indicates that whether fusion or fission the net effect is towards decompression.
The next part of this conceptually is the tie in between charge and structure.  "Flux pumping" 

1) limits the current in the core of the plasma - This is a change of element 1 relative to elements 2 and 3.

2) that completes the magnetic field: this is part of the overall result with item 3 following that involves the change in the alligned vs unaligned ct2 and ct2-ct3 transition states over values in x. See the next item (3).

3) that confines the hot, charged gas:  This is a case of the cart pulling the horse.  While we see forces as controlling, this is where AuT refocuses and raises paradox questions.  In essence, the solutions the the underlying ct1 states define the structure.  in a destablized strucutre (Figure 45) this tends to wards something that will fall apart as reconstruction becomes haphazard as internal splits in the structure grow.  Normally, you merely "age the structure" it slowly destablizes and reforms as a new, more folded structure; but in a plazma the number of states destablizing or coming unwound are magnified relative to the number that are stable so that the structure has less immediate sopportunity to restablize.  This means that the vibration (left side of the drawing above) tends to fail in favor of a destablized structure, plasma.  Nevertheless, as the article indicates, all structures tend towards a net vibrational state indicating (as shown in books 3 and 4) as below .1% destablized at the current stage of expansion of the universe.

4) that produces the reactions. This is covered in the paragraph above.

The article discusses minimizing the current which AuT provides unique insights into how this can be done.  The idea that high current triggers sawtooth instability is unlikely to get a good effect without looking to the overall structural problem for the AuT perspective.  ("This development, found in some fusion plasmas, keeps the current from becoming strong enough to trigger the sawtooth instability.")

The idea of a mixer formed by the molten iron core is interesting because that is what is missing from Venus in terms of sufficient spin and a sufficiently spinning molton iron core; the subject of my book Notes from Venus.

I did not get how the mixer works to maintain the flatness of the current and prevent the sawtooth instability from forming. 

Sawtooth refers to the plasma temperature and density zigzagging up and down.
The idea of preventing this ct3-ct4 event in check is much easier than any ct2 feature, but introducing a high amount of ct2-ct3 states into a system to maintain the fusuion temperatures in such a way as to offset the stablizing or destablizing features should be easier if the specific goals defined by AuT are understood.





The real issue is time or rather the absence of time.
If you look at any of the past genius of physics, Parmenides, Newton, Dirac, Lorentz, Einstein, Bohr and others leading up to me (not really a genius, but quite the hack) the one place they all erred in common was loading everything with dx/dt, the change with respect to time.  Pure physics looked at static changes, levers fixed in place, architecture.  The moment dynamics were introduced into the system it fell apart.  Position in space is accurate, the orbits of positions is not.

In looking for a way to reconcile what is observed from what lies beneath, the results were blurred by this fascination with including something that does not even exist at the quantum level.

The idea of matter and anti-matter is a good example of where the confusion lies.
If you look at a solution to ct3-ct4 phenomena over time you come up with matter and anti-matter.
If you look at these same phenomena without time you get a set of solutions which are moving towards or away from compression.  But what does it mean to be moving towards or away from compression.  Without time, that means you have to look at the net change in ct1 states that affect the two different states.  It is worth noting that in a quantum instant, there is no difference between matter and antimatter.  They have the same weight, the same makeup, there is no charge difference because charge is the change in ct2-ct3 loading over changes in x and from our perspective over time although many of those changes can occur before time from an observer changes because time is a higher effect.

If you take Dirac's equation, before you can truly interpret the universe with it, you must remove one of its most fundamental features, not time, but dimension.

Dirac's equation actually makes a stab in this direction by separating space-time into coordinate sets, but it then tries to reconcile them into the dimension from which we experience things which is time and space together; space to reconcile the co-existing different dimensional mathematical results and time to give these shifting results perspective.
Worse still, Dirac's equation focuses on only one aspect of what is being examined, thereby confusing the other elements as part of this primary portion, the mass-wave relationship.  I intend to say mass-wave and not mass-energy because mass-energy includes an examination of the two excluded element, photon-wave and space-photon interactions.  They way that all physics from Newton forward deal with these pre-time elements is to ignore them, to attempt to wrap them into the gross equation which overshadows them (the polynomial highest factor approximation) and allows All those named physicsts to approximate their way from the correct solution with mathematical tools of varying complexity, in Dirac's case, the multi-dimensional matrix of varying complexity.  The only significant problem with Dirac's equation is that it does not fully comprehend that the four matrix (three of dimension and one of time) solution recognized without admitting that the four different solutions co-exist independently.

Stay with me here.  If you write out Dirac in this fashion (from Wikipedia) you get:



Ad(z) and Bd(y) obviously have time problems because they change, but that is a defect and not a point of convergence.  What this version of Dirac says clearly is that the different dimensional states co-exist.  The can be given properties over time that entangle them, but at quantum instances, they are separate parts of the whole.

The Dirac Sea and Electron Bundle are two ways of looking at the same thing and serve as a good example of where the two theories diverge (or converge).
In Dirac's case he is trapped with time and all of its accompanying features, momentum being primary among them.  We also have Newton crop up, with his grossly misleading object at rest observations which are entirely applicable to the world of the puppet but which are erroneous from the view of the puppeteers.  Why?  Momentum is a feature of net entropy, unfolding of space. Since that can change based on the change in the underlying ct1 fuse states, it is not even right.  Inflection points have to be dealt with and rather than eliminating time and dimension at that level, Newton, Dirac and the others merely created a new form of elements.

In the same way the Dirac Sea is an approximation over time of solutions.  All these solution locations are given an equal weight to approximate the right answer.  The electron bundle is a little different.  There is no sum over time because there is no time.  There is no dimension per say either although AuT like all other theories stumbles onto those hidden shoals far too often.  Instead the electron bundle refers to specific quantum states folded together.

You have the atom's ct1 states, static but capable of movement in either direction (fusion or fission is not the result of this movement, instead it is towards or away from compression); you have the ct2 states of one dimension which give a charge over time to the system and have the effect of charge potential based on the constituent ct1 state make-up fuse wise, the ct3 states of two dimensions which are the first part recognized by Dirac and the third dimensional ct3-ct4 transition states.  Note that I don't use ct4 pure states because Dirac uses our "perspective" and that includes time and that is part of the transition and not the flat ct4 neutron state except to the extent it is in transition.  Since it is constantly in transition like everything else moving, may seem like an irrelevant distinction, but as long as time is a factor, ct4 states and ct5 states serve the primary purpose of concentration the ct3-ct4 states sufficiently so that they can exchange higher ct3 states instead of lower ct1 states to create the clouds of time (ct3 states changing with respect to ct1 movement based on net decompression presently) which allows for the more or less shared time experiences which so confused all of the physicists.

As can more or less readily be seen, the equation on the left embodies the mass-energy conversion, but in attempting to explain it has been broken out into the different dimensional features that co-exist.  The offshoot of this is that if you ignore the time component, you are left with three dimensional coordinates which can be solved separately.

The next problem that has to be dealt with is the weighing of those dimensional features but they are folded together so that we see them as common features.
This brings us to QED and its problems with space which has the same problem as Dirac's equation.  QED is the idea that space is potential and that particles can be formed from the transitions of this potential.  This is frighteningly close to AuT and still wrong because of time in part and a misunderstanding of the potential in part.  Let's jump into this stew.  Both say that space is full, but not only AuT explains why.

QED requires time to work.  You have to average solutions to get a result.
AuT says that space has potential, like QED, but it explains the potential using the features of the ether that makes up space.
QED makes equal amounts of particle and antiparticle because the potential is balanced.  AuT makes either a particle or antiparticle in an unbalanced result based on the direction in which compression occurs and in a stepwise fashion which is invisible to QED because QED is trapped in time based phenomena and the changes from space to photon to wave are time independent.
The matter-antimatter are less about charge and more about pairing in AuT.  If you have two solutions which do not pair properly they fail to compress.  This feature is carried farther into higher states and ultimately drive the universe through folding and unfolding in the fashion that I mentioned should make you faint and from which I used a grossly out of date figure.

I pointed out in reference to this figure that if 13 decompressed, 8 and 34 would lose their continuity and go from, say, a pure neutron to a transitional state, electron and proton type.

Looking at the drawing above, this can be seen at the ct4 level as one of the ct3 states breaking down into ct2 and thereby increasing the amount of ct2 in the system.  If one imagined a sea of unwinding (or winding if you'd like) ct1 states dragging two ct4 states together, if the result over many changes of x is to degrade these states which in their decomposed cloud versions  (as electron/positron pairs for example) in such a way as to get a complete breakdown, energy is release, potentially photons and space are released and this unfolding is not an result, but is instead the driving force, the puppeteer's strings driving the movement of the atomic puppet and if it did not mention we would not move and Dirac's matter/antimatter exchange is movement and time.  There is conversion (not annihilation) of matter and energy; but it is puppet conversion; AuT puppeteer changes are merely solutions where this "order" of underlying states varies gradually over values of x and the "quantum foam" of Dirac is a complete ct1 solid of such density that it cannot exist as spatially separated, but is, instead, a line of solutions folded to give the impression of dimension instead of the "solid" space of puppeteer reality.

From far out

Folding and unfolding

The quantum of change inherent in every point being shown on the left as something that can be shown as fixed potential by the various folded dimensional states.

Most of the physicists who I know of that follow this initial group just further confused things.  The problem is that AuT solutions allow for many different interactions along full and even partial information arms at various ct levels and describe why the idea of photons as light vs waves as light is at best confusing and misleading in the extreme, being two very different things whose connection is that they interchange through folding and unfolding and one can be viewed in terms of time and the other cannot.  Indeed Gehlman and Feynman totally confused mathematics with estimation based on time creating the whole universe of Quarks where estimations of what would become AuT creates particles in place of mathematical solutions; the gross mistake of particle acceleration, that changes over time and with great velocity change what happens in quantum moments which is independent of those speeds.
     It took AuT to show that what Descartes insight taught clearly over 400 years ago and which Einstein, Marley and Michelson accidentally derailed at the turn of the 18th to 19th century better reflects what is happening as long as you get rid of all the illusions that the puppets can somehow be in charge.
All of which brings us to where we want to be.  How can a puppet change what happens via the strings.  We can see and manipulate the ct1-2-3 interface.  Our ability to conduct nuclear reactions shows that.  It is a bio-feedback loop of sorts, the solutions (our ability to measure and predict results is embodied in AuT mathematics) force us to do things and in doing them we fulfill the requirements of the mathematical solutions.
The question is not whether we can rewrite the underlying math which we cannot, but does the underlying math direct us in such a way as to require that we manipulate it to our own ends, two-fold in this case, there being two parts to the equation.
Wherein lies the problem.
One is that the universe will not allow a paradox.  It can stop this in several ways, none of which are necessarily pleasant to me and some of which may be unpleasant to others. This is the so-called paradox of free will which I will get to in due course.