There is not enough evidence of pre-AuT physics to justify the flogging of a cat. In this discussion of flaws present in pre-AuT physics, the role of AuT physics is set out.
https://futurism.com/
This first article points out that traditional physics fails to properly account for the decay rate observed for Taus which AuT would designate an "unstable" transitional state between ct4 and ct5.https://futurism.com/
http://gizmodo.com/new-
This second article corrrectly points out that the standard model for the beginning of the universe is flawed. As AuT points out geometry and time evolved. Correctly, these physicist predicted an early universe having a wave function (defined in a prior post for AuT) and perhaps an initil particle that embodied this. Incorrectly, these pre-AuT physicists saw the particle as important and also saw time introduced at this early stage.
AuT correctly points out that the so called "particle" is nothing more than a mathematical potential which is formed into pre-space forms and then compressed into space forms before time as we view it exists and before there are any "particles." That being said, if you eliminate 90% of the background noise, these ideas support AuT substituting durable values of x for time and information states for particles you begein to approach the correct approach.
Unfortunately, pre-AuT physics completely unravels shortly after that; at least in this article, as "randomness" the non-existent bugaboo in pre AuT physics is poured into the mix in order to justify the existence of the scientists writing or reviewing the articles.
There is also the discussion of bounce type universes, an idea which is entirely consistent with AuT except that bounce universes in prior theories rely on "gravity" whereas AuT universes rely on mathematics, namely net inflection points from expansion and compression due to negative and positive undelrying values, the area being explored in the current series of posts.
The article correctly points out that pre-aut physics is inadequate for the job which we know is because it is not AuT physics.
https://futurism.com/
https://phys.org/news/2017-06-
the length of time a wave could be stored was inversely proportional to its bandwidth. Using a magnetic field (transitional ct1-ct2 sates) the length of storage is increased. Conceptually, what AuT would suggest is that the transitional states allow for longer substitution than would be otherwise present. This is not a new item in AuT, instead it is alorithm driven to have these longer lasting stored states which ultimately rely on the pre-determined math. While they may be maintained for very long periods of time, the algorithm dictates how they will be kept alive.
Why this article out of the billions to review? Because it speaks to a more important aspect of AuT, prediction. One troubling area where AuT interacts with the real work lies in radioactive research. The scientists of the prior two articles would call these scientific advances of a dangerous nature. AuT, on the other hand, would say that compression/decompression cycles dictate that we increase the concentration of fissionable materials. If we are able to determine to what end this is done, we might well determine our own "length of time."
The whole 'probabiiity of things' which is such nonsense in a true quantum universe is replace with 'if we're tending towards it there is a reason, and tending towards concentratomg fossionable materialse , amd of we are tending towards that there is a reaon and it doesn't bode well. can we do anything about it, not really, but we can at least see how stupid we are.
What government official said not enough evidence to flog a cat-relative to mata hari after she was executed?
Looking at the -3 this is seen as the distance between -1 and -2 (away from compression). 5 is the distance from -2 to 3 (compression/positive movement). It can be seen that for high values of x this movement towards or away form compression gets very high.
We are used to thinking of the fixed value as either positive or negative controls, but that doesn't work very well with the model where there is a single positive or negative charge for unitary objects. If it were the measure of single objects it would require a very small deviation.
However, if what we see as positive and negative is merely the net movement towards or away from an inflection point, it can be seen it is eitehr positive or negative except at that one point.
You ask, why?
The simple answer is that the derivation of dimension is driven by the sin type equations which are, at their hear, quantum equations. We are taught that since they are functions of y they have true curvature, but if aut teaches anything, it is that pi is fixed for any fixed amount of information and for any fixed combination of compression states.
Hence, the smooth curve of the sin equation is actually indiivdual net movements either up or down making the sin curve (by virtue of adding all of those points together at least above ct1 whcih is where we observe positive and negatives.
So I was in a discussion the other day about race and it turned to whether a writer could write from the perspective of someone of a different race legitimately. While that is a great moral argument, in the name of meaningless arguments, I think that the argument was put to rest by Harriet Beacher Stowe with her "Uncle Tom's Cabin."
Lincoln is supposed to have said when meeting her, 'So you're the little woman who wrote the book that made this great war!.' This says volumes about the difference that one person can make, the power of the printed word and the legitimacy of writing from the perspective of someone who is vastly different.
With that disclaimer, I want to discuss a book I'm reading and a book I've published. The book I reading is (I'll give the name later) about the late 1800 changes in the Ottoman Empire, so far focused on the great Canal and slavery. The violence, even after the Civil War, associated with the middle eastern Sudan slave trade, 'the old people's bones lining the slave roads, the children too young to walk tossed to the side of the roads,' and relevant to my book, the Absynnian sex slave trade.
This is the forward of "The First Battlefield of WWII"
So with that I'm going to put some chapters from my book which takes place at the time immediately after that book ends, having finished with out of doors in the holy land.
Figure 5 shows the vibrational nature and the
preservation of states. This gives the
impression of durability of results and also the importance of transitions
between these states. The length between
1 and -2 is -3 (direction is negative), between -2 and 3 is 5; between 3 and -4
is -7. I.E. the distance between any
state and the next higher state gives the same result as the denominator for pi
which gives a ratio (for the total amount of information) between two F-series
states.
What pi reflects is -1^x+2x(-1)^x-1; which in turn
reflects this transition.
X=1=-1+2(1)(-1)^0=1
X=2=-3
X=3=5,etc.
This recurring pattern defines the denominator for
pi and is the base for comparison to higher states which is critical to both
curvature and to compression, but it also reflects the difference between each
state in the alternating positive and negative state building.Figure 5 is interesting because it shows the derivation of the denominator (comparison ratio) as a function of moving towards or away from compression.Looking at the -3 this is seen as the distance between -1 and -2 (away from compression). 5 is the distance from -2 to 3 (compression/positive movement). It can be seen that for high values of x this movement towards or away form compression gets very high.
We are used to thinking of the fixed value as either positive or negative controls, but that doesn't work very well with the model where there is a single positive or negative charge for unitary objects. If it were the measure of single objects it would require a very small deviation.
However, if what we see as positive and negative is merely the net movement towards or away from an inflection point, it can be seen it is eitehr positive or negative except at that one point.
You ask, why?
The simple answer is that the derivation of dimension is driven by the sin type equations which are, at their hear, quantum equations. We are taught that since they are functions of y they have true curvature, but if aut teaches anything, it is that pi is fixed for any fixed amount of information and for any fixed combination of compression states.
Hence, the smooth curve of the sin equation is actually indiivdual net movements either up or down making the sin curve (by virtue of adding all of those points together at least above ct1 whcih is where we observe positive and negatives.
So I was in a discussion the other day about race and it turned to whether a writer could write from the perspective of someone of a different race legitimately. While that is a great moral argument, in the name of meaningless arguments, I think that the argument was put to rest by Harriet Beacher Stowe with her "Uncle Tom's Cabin."
Lincoln is supposed to have said when meeting her, 'So you're the little woman who wrote the book that made this great war!.' This says volumes about the difference that one person can make, the power of the printed word and the legitimacy of writing from the perspective of someone who is vastly different.
With that disclaimer, I want to discuss a book I'm reading and a book I've published. The book I reading is (I'll give the name later) about the late 1800 changes in the Ottoman Empire, so far focused on the great Canal and slavery. The violence, even after the Civil War, associated with the middle eastern Sudan slave trade, 'the old people's bones lining the slave roads, the children too young to walk tossed to the side of the roads,' and relevant to my book, the Absynnian sex slave trade.
This is the forward of "The First Battlefield of WWII"
In a northern desert in Africa
lies an oasis. A few trees grow there, a
few spiny, stunted desert plants and a well surrounded by sand in as an
isolated a place as exists on dry land.
It
could be said the first battlefield of World War II was the last battlefield of
World War I. But World war I ended.
World War II must have begun afterwards and the starting place for World War II
was this Oasis.
This
book is a work of fiction, but if it has a historical thesis, then the thesis
of this book is this; World War II started with a battle around the time of
American Thanksgiving in 1934 at the Wal Wal desert oasis. Like the events which started WWI, the
participants were quickly marginalized by subsequent events. For a short period of time, one of the combatants
on the winning side of World War I, engaged in a horrible war history largely
chose to forget.
The
war began in Ethiopia, the first battlefield of World War II and the last
battlefield of Africa colonialism.
Africa
for a short time was fully colonialized and so damaged politically it never
fully recovered. The horrors of World
War II resulted from collusion, tacit or otherwise, allowing the belligerents
to act against a peaceful African nation, a member of the league of nations. This is not speculation this is history.
Little
of this appears in popular history. Most
histories, at most, show one or two photographs. These preserve none of the horrors of what
would become known as the Second Absinthian war. There is little if anything
about this battle resulting in World War II except in scholarly texts.
This
story is a work of fiction, but the battlefield which is described in this book
existed and the battles took place, much as it is laid out.
No comments:
Post a Comment