that's right, still nothing. The universe is a perverse little thing. It's hard to get into the heads of my readers, seeing the universe for the first time clearly and...what? I can see how the universe develops, its most inner workings, looking backwards and forwards trillions of years and beyond time and even space in either direction, well sort of in either direction, and yet I don't know if I'm getting through to you at all.
I wonder if you wonder about the relevance of what you read. Do you share it? Do you go to sleep thinking about me as I go to sleep thinking about you?
Book 2 is present in both forms and while it isn't complete by itself, it's probably the most complete version incorporating as it does 95% of the grant which has to be self explanatory. There are volumes yet to write.
Let's talk about patterns
Zero may be in there somewhere, it may not be. This is the realm of g-space and for the moment, rather than answer questions of great isgnficance to those who would ignore me, let me assume that i'll die, lealve a mystery and you will suffer for it.
First visible step is -1, the most powerful apparent number in g-space.
2) -1^x
3) 2x(-1)^x-1
4) 2*y/(pix^(2n+1)
5) f(n)
6) 2f(n)^(2n)
The existence of intermediary steps after step 6 is observed and n varies from 1-infinitity.
Let's look at time dilation in this context.
You have x
You have a multiple of x moving from positive to netative values (ct1)
As the amounts of ct1 increase you begin to have 1:ct1 changing relative to 256 ct2 states.
The ratios from here on out allow relative perception changes even though at the ct0 state and to some extent in the ct1 state continue to be at the same rate for the constituent parts of the higher states.
The change in x is at a single rate, likewise the movement between positive and negative values continue to change at the same rate, but the length of the transition value between these positive and negative values, get longer and longer and provide a perspective for relative change.
Time dilation and aging suggest that the features of these larger chains 256 to 1, etc change relative to the surrounding environment to create first velocity at a 1:256 exchange and in higher states, even wave states where the difference is not observed, a sharing state and an exchange state which also have a ratio.
10^16 to 1 is the ratio of change of ct3 to ct4.
The maximum rate of change of 1:256 is preserved within this (at light speed) based on:
10^2^4 (ct4)
*6^2^3 (ct3)
*4^2^2 (ct2)
The transition between ct2 and ct1 at 256:1 is a more perfect transition since the shift otherwise breaks down to transitional changes which are viewed as electromagnetism even though they remain viable. These changes are bidirectional meaning that they travel from positive to negative and from negative to positive.
The exchange rates between ct3 and ct4 are not at 256:1 that would create light speed and a break down instead exchanges occur within the matrix as positive and negative changes require the balance to shift. The "within the matrix" includes between transitional states, PEP suggesting that these exchanges are between transitional states to achieve a balanced result. The balance that appears relatively perfect at ct4 (electron) states, becomes imbalanced within transitions although the transition arms that exist in either direction (combining and decombining) suggest that there is a near constant imbalance giving rise to less than perfect velocity and less than perfect substition.
Because exchanges are constant at every level and only relative change gives rise to perception the calculation of any point becomes complicated. AuT spends most of its time looking a compression, but the anti-compression aspects which presumably include a brea(down in information at a level where time doesn't exist raises issues about what can be determined from gross observations of information.
To understand this, let's look at the current universe, about 1/10th of the way towards the net inflection point where the flow of information will exchange from decompression towards compression.
There are huge accumulations of compression which will eventually decompress up to a point. As they do so, they release information stored about the past which give rise to our sense of history as much as that history is preserved by building the next time state from the past. To understand this let's look at a brief historical event; the decision to walk outside.
Past information states are combining in order to create a sequence. In a net expansion universe, presumably as much as 10 times as much compressed information is decompressing compelling (in what we view as entropy) the movement towards the out of doors. This release of information from a compressed state is visible as history even though it is coming from the present and even though the next moment will be the result of a combination of past information.
It looks like this on a net scale:
forx=1 (x-1+x-2=x)
for y=1 to 10 (y=y-1+y-2)
In a decompressing universe where entropy is increasing you have this relative massive net release of information to get the sense of time. Because this happens in transition states between higher and lower compression states it is smooth, but it also results in a 1:10 net movement which is why things seem to be moving so fast.
It also shows, however that the future in a net expansion universe, is built from the present, which in effect means it is built from the past being steadily released at a ratio which entropy suggests is greater, perhaps much greater than the degree to which the future results from a new combination of past events.
Indeed, without this there would be no predictability to the universe, but the importance of this to how AuT can be used is enormous and unconventional. But more on this later, perhaps. God forbid you'd buy one of my books or ask me to lecture on these issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment