The science of what I wanted to put into book 4 is actually written into the chapter below, but a little discussion is worthwhile, if repetitive.
One of the fun things is that I'm able to take the science of the different groups involved and put them with my, more advanced and organized science.
I'm not getting the amount of peer review that I deserve yet, but I'm read all over the world and 4 years into the math that will redefine our place in the universe that is pretty good I suppose. I still think everyone will rue the day they failed to book me to speak, but some popular physicist will do it and perhaps be as entertaining, almost. This book should help because it will strike at the popular pscyhe I suppose. Until then it is fun. I am suffering from several maladys today in addition to those regular ones that never go away, I will not bore you with them. I also have a lot to do and am on the teeter-totter of events, wondering if the dramatic change I have been working on for what now appears to be a year will come through or not. I digress.
Time. History. Aging. Velocity.
These related things, even in pre-aut physics are very similar in AuT, being manifestations of the same thing, information change.
Time is two things. The time we talk about is the successive set of solutions giving rise to history. Within these solutions is history, the accumulation of information states at any quantum moment (any quantum value of x) which change compression and decompression between all the different higher ct states. It can go forward or backwards but it cannot be changed for any quantum moment. When it goes forward, it is the compression of information when it goes backwards it is the decompression of information. In this way, history is made from the very small amount of new information added to the universe as x increases and from the changes of the information as it comrpessess and decompressess. The flow of time and history are very different in fission and fusion.
Aging is an effect of internal sharing of higher states within ct4, and presumably in ct5 (of ct4 states). Velocity is the substitution of external higher states within the solution matrix.
This diagram shows this process in a very general sense.
A different view is provided by this drawing
While these both show the same thing, the show different aspects. The top one shows history being built and breaking down. The bottom one shows how individual compressive states form and break down over a series of steps and how substitution can play into this compressive series.
Neither shows the ct0-ct1 transition which is equally important, providing the basis for gravity, while not generating the same type of transition. The figure below shows one representation of the apparent process, but gravity is a spiral effect which is why it is seen as a force arising from the transition (sinpi0 to sinpi1).
This entire book comes down to a discussion of the interaction of these 4 different, but related items, the true interrelationships being disclosed for the first time in teh 4 books of AuT and, for your amusement, in these blog posts.
Chapter 11
“I want to know why my grant proposal isn’t taken seriously.”
“It’s not taken seriously because its not complicated enough to represent the universe. Look at those equations on gravitational interaction…”
“Oh you horses ass. The complexity doesn’t come in the equations themselves, it comes in their interactions.”
“You think calling me a horses ass is helping your case?”
“I’m sorry.”
“You’re not sorry, your starving, your starving yourself. Go get a real job, forget physics, you don’’t have the temperament for it.”
“You have to listen, you know I’m right.”
“I don’t know you are right. You say there are thermodynamics. Well, that cold that creeps into your body when you sleep in the gutter, that’s thermodynamics.”
“A few minutes…please.”
“I know how dear that request is to you.”
“First, it isn’t simple. It’s complicated. There is a constant change on several levels, like a multi-level chess set. At the bottom, it goes on constantly, is the increase in x and the consequent increase in the total amount of information in the system. While small at the universal level, it is enormous in terms of a number over time.”
“Even though time doesn’t exist at that level according to you.”
“I’ll get to that. The next level is the vibrational level, 1,-3,5,-7 which gives rise to relative separation between the first level and the vibrational level which allows for solution order and which is the foundation for gravitational interaction.
“Then you get to the level where time and space are created, where you get to the true curvature and where the variation is based on a successive set of f(n)^2^n compression states.”
“You’re a little unclear on how that occurs. It has to be the solution to a math algorithm, anything else would require a …”
“IT would require a force and then you’re in bed with the rest of us, something you cannot stomach.”
“I could agree that there are events that occur at the level below the equation that cause it to exist, but our forces all arise from the interactions…not interactions, from the fixed state solutions relative to one another and the effect of different solutions over the now existent time. Because the changes are on so many different levels, all simultaneously solved, it appears complex. But there’s more.”
“You have another minute, I’m unconvinced, and I have papers from real physicists with higher degrees.”
“Paper…””
“One minute.”
“Of course. It’s the effect of the creation of time through F-series addition. It means that one state is built on another state as compression increases. It means that we can observe history because the prior solutions are embodied in the present solutions. We can predict the future…Don’t look skeptical, I mean we can determine how chemicals can react and where planets will go because those events are built from the present. But randomness, not real randomness, but apparent randomness, comes from the break down of information, in the universe as a whole right now, the net break down in certain present states so that part of the future, the greater part of the future, is not based on the buildup of compressed information states, but from the breakdown of higher states, releasing information compressed from the past.”
“Those are all simple formula. They cannot account for the universe we observe.”
“They can’t..” sputtering..”look, the all go on together for higher states. Look at space, it looks calm, even. It only is affected by the increase in the total amount of information, a modest effect, the breakdown of information, a large but still indirect effect of ct2 states breaking down to ct1 states, and the variations between positive and negative compression that reflect the breaking down or compression of ct1 states. These ‘are’ simple relatively speaking so space looks bland to us, even though even your physics recognizes what is to you a ‘mysterious’ force called space pressure or other nonsensical names. The only difference in AuT is that it clearly defines this force as the net break down of higher states which you see in an expanding universe, at least in the majority of places. But once you have mass, the world we live in, you not only have these forces going on at a microscopic level, but you also have the compressive and decomrpessive forces of higher states, the sharing vs substitution of information that trade off between aging and velocity…”
“You make my head hurt. Find something worthwhile to do, you have a good imagination, perhaps you could write.”
“It’s not imagination. Its mathematics applied to observed phenomena.”
“You want to redefine what time is, what history is, what thermodynamics is, what everything is. You don’t even have a phD.”
“Did Copernicus?”
“That’s different.”
“It’s not different. You are blinded by your education. You have all the facts, but you cannot see them.”
“If you had more physics, you’d understand.”
“If I had more…you fool. Nostradamus…”
“Aha! I knew it. You’re back to trying to prove you can see the future. Buy a winning lottery ticket and come back to. Now go, this has gotten silly.”
“Wait, it’s not what I can do, its what I could do, what you could do. If you only see time and future for what it is…” But it was too late. The reviewer was reading another paper.
You can be desperate, homeless and destitute, he thinks, but even if you are going blind, you cannot make those who chose to be blind see.
No comments:
Post a Comment