AuT Another look at time 2, article review and relativity

I have no compunction about what I do to pre-aut physics just as the greater physics community doesn't care what it does to me.

In the first post we talked about other ratios giving rise to time.  In book 4, where this topic is covered in more detail, it is bound to the difference in some substitution rate, ct0, ct1 or the ct0-ct1 information arms and some other or other group of higher ct rate exchange.
Time for a black hole might be different in this regard.
In order to understand it better it is helpful to look at how ct0 changes occur in a pre-space environment and what ct1 exchange is seen for different time states.
Higher ct changes are impossible for lower ct states of course and mathematically due to the number of places changing at once, the number effectively of coordinates changing at once, ct4 is made of ct3 substitutions and even the compressed ct4 states, neutrons and protons for example, appear to be made up of some combination of ct3 and ct4 state compression, transition arms of ct5.
In terms of dimension, ct1 exchange is the preferred exchange media for comparison purposes.  The reason is two fold.  First, we don't have 4 dimensions.  That suggests, ignoring the perspective of ct4-ct5 carrier arms, that the "three polar coordinates" are ct2, 3 and 4 (f2, f3, f4).   Second, we see movement necessarily as the change in higher states relatve to ct1 and movement, relative velocity, changes time.

Second look:  Velocity may be slightly different.  It may be ct1absorpbtion and ct1 dispersion together.  Otherwise, it looks like gravity or anti-gravity. 

Would that make aging absorption or dispersion without the other?   This is a complicated idea, one that lies at the base of the validity vel non of this theory.

Different compression times states, the single variable algorithm and the offsetting expanding and contracting infinite series fit so well with observations.  The idea of the exchange of ct1 states works extremely well with describing acceleration.  The offset between compressed states, the ratios, work well with the idea of time dilation.  But the question still remains of how ct1 changes within a highly compressed state create standard clock time.  The idea of ct1 exchange works well compared to internal sharing of ct1 states and seems a likely result.  The model is detailed to a point but how does this detail correspond to other observations, and how specific can we get, how perfectly can we match perfectly observations of dilation with this model.

http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2016-226&rn=news.xml&rst=6607
This article is not particularly enlightening on its face.  It may, however, provide insight to the idea of localized compression (or decompression) giving rise to unique features within an otherwise largely uniform space-time fabric, at least for the moment.  I suppose at best what I'd say is that this is an article to keep around in case something comes up that might bring it into the same sphere as AuT explained phenomena as the article a few days past on black holes that are too old not to explain using AuT.

Here is something else, probably the core of this post.
A lecture on relativity or more specifically pre AuT time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbmf0bB38h0

The primary beneficial result of this view of time and the more accurate, albeit unfinished, view of AuT is that AuT defines a pure form of quantum time, not some hashed up 4 dimensional view which is neither accurate nor particularly illuminating.

What this doesn;t show is that each overlapping state is of a different length.  This is an issue which will be addressed conceptually.