AuT-Another look at time

Last night I wrote about Parminedes, the father or at least grandfather of AuT.  Then as I slept, a vision of time occurred to me, at once so obvious that I had to wonder at my stupidity until I reconciled myself to it being a function of Supersymmetry, not really my intelligence at all.
The interplay of high ct states continues to be important to this undertaking, but recognizing that the universe is in constant motion, another idea suddenly occurred to me, however inherent it is in the model to date.
What if, my sleeping mind asked me, aging was the ratio of postive and negative states within a system at the ct1 level (Or possibly the ct2 level).  These states, you will recall, vary in length from -3,5,-7,etc.
It is important to see the part of the discussion of Parminedes to see why the rather obvious insight occurred to me, but that will have to come shortly, since this post will be full enough when complete.
In order to understand this, we note that we are constantly in motion, spinning, moving through the universe, vibrating.  In the net entropy universe that we currently live in (for another 7 billion years or so) the amount of break down, negative solutions, is greater than the building (positive solutions).  This means the number of negative ct1 states -3,-7,-11, etc is greater than the number of postive soutions, 5,9,13, etc. 
We see a version of our f-series friends in the vibration fpluspix solutions 0,-1,1,-2,3 portrayed in the f-series as 0,1,1,2,3 although the ct1 f series model deviates from the vibrational model past this point.  (f-series 5, 8; fpluspix -4, 5).  Books will be written on this transition, after I'm dead. 
We've previously discussed that AuT speculated that our ability to recognize the past comes from its incorporation in the future as an f-series solution along with information arms.  The interplay between the f-series build up of the future and the negative state break down of the past warrants a more in depth discussion.

When we look at this figure as a two way street, we can get a better idea of how complicated this process is in a more compressed solution.  Aa1 and Aa2 show two diffferent places where a break down of ct2 can occur in ct2 built up with, in this case, both postive and negative ct0 states within the ct1 state.
The complexity of this model is exponentially greater in higher ct states which would break down from the ct2 states in ct3, the ct3 states in ct4 and so on.
Looking at even this relatively early example of velocity and entropy interacting it can be seen that the process is far from simple.  This complexity is why we "age" from the increased entropy, at a higher rate.  The ct1 substitutions are velocity, but aging may be a couple of things.  One is likely the break down of ct2 states resulting from the change in polarity of the ct1 states which in turn is due to the ct0 fpluspix changes from positive to negative.  There are several layers of interplay:
1) The positive vs negative ct0 fpluspix ratio
2) The breakdown of ct1 states (ct1 states staying positive or negative would be aging, their staying constant would allow for combination at higher ct states presumably).
We've talked about changes in time itself which continues to be a one way steet.
Can time reverse itself?  The answer is a little more complicated than it seems, because we cannot "go back" to a prior state without destroying information, resetting x which would entail reshifting the entire universe.  Theoretically, it would then inexorably continue just as it had before so the net effect would be no effect at all.  But in a net anti-entropy universe, time would be experienced a little differently, but exactly how is a little confusing to think about.
If there were more ct1 positive states being substituted, perhaps being added to carriers in effect, we'd age slower and move faster.  If the ct1 states remain in place, we age, but if they change we move and this visibly seems a little confusing at this stage.
Substitution and movement along carrier arms are different conceptually but may be the same in practice.  A longer examination of time will reveal the logic of one model vs the other.
Using this same broad model,  if there was a greater build up of higher ct states, we'd age faster, we'd move slower.  The idea is that the breakdown of higher ct states as a result of losing their component ct1 parts through polarity changes, is the conceptual aging (breakdown=aging) but the substitution of ct1 states (which may be adding them to the information arms) is velociy and anti aging.  Again, logic may indicate one model but practice may support the other.
In an anti-entropy universe there is less "free" ct1 to go around as it is incorporated into higher ct states which is why the higher state compression remains important even with this idea of a different ratio (postive to negative fpluspix) being at work with the prior ratio.
 All of these observations occur from a net standpoint, according to this model since ct1 positive and negative states remain no matter what inflection point is being approached.
Let's consider this.  High gravity and high anti-entropy states have less movement, they are more organized, they move less relative to their environment, at least internally.  When we launch a rocket, we see that as an act of intellect, but aut says that it is merely supersymmetry coming up with a rather complex solution that leads us to increasing the velociy of that rocket.
In this conceptual framework, that velocity, the increase in ct1 state substitution is actually an increase in teh amount of ct1 positive states absorbed.  That rocket is becomeing anti-entropic.  It isn't aging because velocity is the equivalent of ct1 postiive states building within a system relative to ct1 negative states.
This is a substantial, and intriguing definition of time.
Time is the ratio in a system of ct1 postive to ct1 negative states.
It raises many questions that I am not ready to answer, questions that were not answered by my dreams or, quite frankly, the obviousness of this suggestion.
As you watch a train go by at speed it shrinks in length relative to the still train?  How in this model?  Why in this model?  And doesn't the train itself lengthen as it absorbs all this ct1?
At a very high entropic universe state (right before the next or last big bang) aging would be very fast,  and speed would be slow.  There being very little free ct1 thismakes a lot of sense, but is it entirely consistent with this model.
I believe that higher ct state substitution continues to be critical in our experience of this; that is we are building and destroying the higher ct states based on this ct1 increase or decrease in entropy.
For now, sleep has abandoned me and my day starts well before the sun arises.  I watch the dawn arise with another day.  The taking of the waters, has brought me back to some semblance of health, albeit a tenuous one.  The constant coughing has become, despite the cold, sporadic.  Only my problems and those of the world keep me awake.
Book 5 was supposed to wait, but these inquiries into time press me.
Don't rest, don't stop, don't allow yourself time to recupperate, they tell me.  Your time is limited, the demands of the universe great.