It will take a while to read through it, but its this whole issue.
But the discussion of the connection between this equation:
And these figures:
And this solution:
[-1^x plus 2x(-1)^x-1] is a mathematical red herring.
The right answer appears to be associated from going to the prior negtiave to the next postive and then the other way, the solution for each side has to be determined and then the distance and relative solution direction. The algorithm giving 2x just happens to be an alternative way to get there which doesn't include the idea of each solution surviving which means it has to be wrong.
Another way to phrase this might be in order. For example instead of the -1^xplus 2x(-1)^x-1 the solution could be this:
-1^x * -1^(x-1)-(-1)^x+1 (or however you get to the next positve or negative value) for this picture:
This gives the vibrational answer and eliminates the 2x which turns into a red herring. The place to start is with the recognition that this is
-1^x, the base equation plus the prior solution
-1^x-1.
In between these two is 2x.
So this exchange is in error and needs to be changed to reflect the right approach given in the picture above. Again, the genius of AuT is that it is consistent, the surviving solutions give rise to the equation above, and then afterwards to the f(n)^2^n where the direction between the two solutions may be critical to the overall result.
Once I have that charged out, I'll come back and fix this exchange:
Chapter 7 The physicist challenged
I was angry. I had to argue to get my thesis approved. “Algorithm Universe Theory (AuT) is not a minor theory. It defines not only the source and effects of Quantum Mechanics, but the origin of space time itself.”
“Who are the morons that I have to ask for money,” I complained as he helped me to adjust my tie.
“They are the ones that have the money. Now quit complaining and get out there and present your theory.
I walked out and looked at the panel. “You all have my paper, so I’m uncertain as to why I have to make a presentation. It should be fairly obvious that I have presented a compelling argument for the circumstances surrounding the establishment of dimension to the universe.”
“We have you paper, but I’m unconvinced that the universe is defined by a single variable. If it is, why can I say whether you get your grant or not?”
“It’s a good question, but the basic concepts behind it is…”
“Let’s start there, in a sentence set out your theory.”
“In a sentence! Define the universe! Fine. The universe is the solution to a single variable algorithm defining offsetting infinite expanding and contracting algorithms about a solution to -1.”
“That seems a little unlikely.”
“It isn’t. Variations in 0’ (-1^x) lead to comparison with -1^x-1 because you have the first solution and the second to compare. This process continues since each survives and each is added to the other. There is a factor 2x to the older.”
“Why?”
“I’m not sure, but I’d guess because the next answer is twice the prior total. If you look at it this way, there are 3 solutions, so x=3 and there are 6 of these following solutions for each of the preceding solutions.
It looks like this:
1 yields 2
2 yields 4
3 yields 6
And so on.
That means that each solution in the series yields two subsequent solutions.”
“The shouldn’t it be 2x(-1^x)?”
“Normally, yes, but the universe is based on the negative solution and not the positive. It’s moving backwards.”
“That makes no sense.”
“It does if you believe Einstein. He said ‘the only reason for time is so that everything doesn’t happen at once.’ Of course, he misunderstood what time was.”
“And you know?”
“Of course, how could I define supersymmetry if I didn’t.”
"So how do you answer backwards from infinity?"
"You don't but for any fixed value of x you can answer it backwards. It's a giant adding machine so once you have the value of x, all the other answers are given. I’m not sure that’s the answer, but it has to be something like that.”
#quantummechanics
#writerslife
#spacetime
#aut
#superasymmetry
#allfornothing:(
No comments:
Post a Comment