NLT-Black Holes and isolated Forces-pre event horizon analysis 2 of 3

Of walruses, quasar beams, and the event horizon
Something interesting happens at the event horizon in NLT and I am about to tell you what it is.
We start with the simplified equation for gravity (or gravitas for our walrus friends) Gm1*m2/r^2 where the mass and distance define the strangeness of the so called event horizon.  But what, dear reader is the event in NLT.
Let's digress, because I know how you love my digressions.  Apparently the idea of floating cars, instantaneous travel and unlimited power were unsatisfying to those who would provide me with the desired fully furnished cave laboratory. Of course I would prefer something exotic.  The hills of Turkey, the mountains of the family home in the steppes of Russia, the always jewish physicist friendly greater German empire, a Roman alps location, The Brazilian border states, the Chilean moutnains, perhaps, I'd even settle for something in the hills of New Mexico.  But those things which would foster brotherly love hold no interest for you. So how about a quasar beam weapon that you could blast through your enemies with?  Interested?  Well, that figures, let's continue.
At the event horizon in EHT, the old standby that had to stand down, gravity merely won.  The matter falling into the black hole would turn energetic, photonic, spatial and then just disappear completely.  Alas, even I am capable of a minor wrong turn, understanding that deep inside I knew the right way all along.  Why?  Because the gravity failed to disappear.  The pesky gravity affected my gravitas and so I delved deeply into the math and the result is that we know that the blackest of black holes is little more than a black hole of ct5 states, a particle of that up to the point where there is enough matter to form two of them.
Now you are saying, so there is an accretion of matter, highly compressed, but not able to stably maintain a ct5 state because of a lack of concentration around a black hole.  And the walruses are chewing their mustachios in delight, twirling their bowlers so fast the friction threatens to set them on fire, will I say there is their beloved hologram.  Oh joy they think, we will be justified at last, the theory of NLT will collapse and we can start looking for our non-existent Higgs particles again, but in the back sits a chair bound walrus, nervously glancing about.  It cannot be that easy.  And of course, NLT being correct, it is not.
So the problem with our equation is that m1 and m2 are getting pretty big (the masses of the black hole and the accumulating matter).  Worse still, r is going to zero.
But matter cannot go to to CT5, so what happens?  First it flattens out, as all spinning systems do.  And what do you have with an ever increasing very tight two dimensional system?  Whatever it is it must be consistent with NLT and it must fit in with the rest of this blog.
The matter, etc cannot to go ct5 but is very very flat.  Two dimensionally flat.  Any guesses yet?  We have to observe what is predicted and what we see is at right angles to the disc a beam of high energy which we know as quasars and the beam is the quasar beam I promised earlier.
And how is this consistent with NLT?  Because if the "stuff" orbiting a CT5 point cannot go to CT5 but is 2 dimensional it can go from matter to energy and that is what it does, thereby having the power to leave at the point where it might otherwise go to light.  There is one more but this is only 2 of 3 and something has to happen.
And, by the way, the quasar beam might be of use against an alien invasion, but wouldn't do much as an offensive weapon.  If the chinese shot us the beam would pass through the earth and if the angle was right (not a direct line I'm told) it would fry them too, not to mention a number of other problems like pushing the earth out of its orbit.  Still, something to think about when planning the zip codes of your cave laboratories.