NLT-A peak into the land of god 5 of 10 why don't the numbers line up perfectly

This post has the info from a prior post to put everything into context.  The problem addressed is why don't the numbers in any physics inquiry line up properly.  The discussion of exponential compression or exponential organization or whatever you want to call it raises an age old problem in physics. We get Planck lengths which are not only different from one another (there is more than one way to skin a Planck length cat) but are inconsistent with observed phenomena.
Somehow we have to reconcile these inconsistencies with a relatively well known and observable universe.  While NLT is elegant, it doesn't solve every problem, but it does give several ways to approach these types of problem.
There is a unique inquiry afoot.  The answers to the fundamental questions of the universe continue.

We have the solved the question of the event horizon.  To recap, the event horizon reflect matter falling into an orbit about a black hole which is a high gravity ct5 state as a result of 10^32 matter or energy-a question yet to be fully explored, but to be answer in principle here, into a single particle of clock time 5.  The way to determine the very interesting question of scale is to see what the minimum size of a black hole is.  What are there two choice and why does it appear to be 10^32 fundamental particles of matter?

First, there are two choices because if you are talking about decisions based on the simple formula 2^n as n changes from 0 to infinity in whole numbers, the bit coordinate increase than presumably you are talking about a decision based system where the number of possible outcomes are directly related to the initial state.  However, this does not appear to be what is happening.

Instead, as the clock time states increase, the each clock time state becomes the fundamental unit of change.  That is you start with non-linear time and 2^0 which is 1, one bit, plus or minus.  Then you go to the photonic state 2^1 or 2 where there are two possible choices reflected in a two dimensional state, but the resulting force is a one dimensional force, gravity (it cannot pull dimensionally, it can only pull to non-linearity).  In a normal informational system, a coin flip for example, the next example would be to have 3 coins tossed at once, but instead the concentration appears to be that of the compressed state. 2^4 of the two dimensional state.  This process continues so that at the transition between matter and energy you have 10^16 fundamental units of energy for each fundamental particle of matter.  Keep in mind this is only a scale function, a question of what happens when you go from 10^8 to 10^16, you see a transition in terms of fundamental particles of one type to fundamental particles of the next.  The same result appears to be consistent with the scale of black holes.  While ct5 particles (black hole individual particles) would be very large indeed if they were merely 10^32 fundamental particles of energy, they appear instead to follow the pattern set by matter (and presumably by the lower states) in terms of the amount of concentration necessary to have a stable unit.

Around this incredibly powerful gravity source, matter and energy are drawn, but even though they fall towards the singularity, they cannot reach it.  They cannot even transition from their current states to a CT5 state unless they reach a stable quantity, at least not permanently.  Laboratory data from particle accelerators indicates that temporary black holes can form.  These would be high energy states where an isolated concentration of matter occurs which doesn't have the concentration to be stable but is sufficiently concentrated to attain features of CT5.

This would indicate that in the high concentrations around a black hole, those at the event horizon and perhaps closer, the concentrations approach CT5 states and the speed with which the matter and energy "drop" towards the point get faster and faster flattening out the orbits and creating a situation where it is presumed that (1) the concentration approaches CT5 without permanently being able to arrive leading to an easy transition between those states (matter and CT5 since the energy is sufficiently compacted to transition into matter and (2) the "disk of material (matter and energy changing into matter) approaches an infinite flatness allowing for an easy transition to the two dimensional states of energy and the flattened matter.  (3) Presumably in between you'd have a highly concentrated state of matter at such a high energy state that it would be difficult to distinguish it from either energy or CT5.

What is seen is that much of this matter remains in orbit, increasing the gravity of the black hole (CT5) until a second unit of black hole is created (2x10^32 would be the starting point, but not the ending point.

The largest black hole is approximate 17billion times as large as the sun.

The smallest black hole is 6.3 suns.  So we can say that a "hydrogen black hole" is 6.3 suns, a "helium black hole" is 12.6 suns.  These very rough numbers can be worked backwards to get the size of fundamental units of other items (10^32 into 6.3 suns would tell you the size of the smallest particle of matter under this theory although that very rough number doesn't work any better than Planck Mass works for the smallest fundamental particle of matter).

Roughly, this yields the following analysis: 2x10^33g as the weight of the sun, 1.26x10^34g for a hydrogen black hole (hbh).  HBH^1/32=11.6 grams.

This suggests that a fundamental particle of matter would be 11 grams (that’s a lot since an electron is 9x10^-28 grams and a proton 1.6x10^-24grams).  We can make this worse.  Using an electron as the minimum size (as opposed to any of the other quark particles) this suggests a conversion rate of 2^64 which implies an intermediary stage or a jump in quantum size of compression 2^16 (2^4) jumping to 2^64 (2^6).  This progression of 0,1,2,3,4,6 has some frightening characteristics.  For example 0+1+2=3; 1+3=4;2+4=6 suggesting the next progression would be 3+6=9.  There is no basis for a non linear progression that comes to mind, but this would still be a patterned progression and if it turns out to be accurate, it would be worth additional study. 

Using Plank Mass (PM)  you get a conversion rate of 10^38 (sun) vs 10^-8 (Plank mass which is 10^46^th and which is probably outside the astronomic margins of error for 10^32.  However PM has been calculated using magnetic flux as 2.5x10^-4g  http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0707/0707.0058.pdf.  This yields a factor of 10^42.  For electrons the scale appears way off 10^-28 to 10^34 which is 62, very close to the 10^64 integer jumping 2^6.

So you have PM which, while far from perfect, is at least a little closer.
The deviation for matter minimum size to Planck minimum size is smaller (10^20) than the electron minimum particle to black hole prediction-(off by 10^29) but both show predictions wildly off from observations.

For electrons to BH you have 10^62 and for protons or neutrons it would be 10^58 in terms of a pure mass scale.  The “obvious” question is what is half way in size between a black hole and an electron where you have the so called “missing link” of matter.  We can find some candidates.  One possibility would be a black hole with no acretion disk, no populated event horizon.  While such a "point" would have some "size" (fundamental particle size for a black hole just as we have the different types of fundamental particles for matter) it would be very hard to see.  Unfortunately, it woudl also likely be at the center of several solar systems (from collapsed stars of a size 1/2 the size of 3.6 suns).  Now these solar systems would be hard to see since they are dark so we cannot rule this out completely.  There are more important aspects, however, that we should look harder at.  Fundamental particle size is variable.  From Plank Mass to electron to proton to neutron to quark and, god forbid we go off on this tangent, strings (see the article above for a more thorough discussion of going in for harmonics vs something more).  The concept of orbits allowing the formation of several intermediary stages of matter and the concept that we have "massless" formations (EMF and Photons, not to mention space, but we mentioned it) and then "jump" to mass at the matter to energy transition indicates that mass is the wrong "scalar" for tracking change.

Since we know that an electron is a scale smaller than planck length of 10^-20 we can say that a lot more goes into the analysis of minimum particle size than a little math error.

We end up with some choices.   First you can reject Non-linear time entirely, but that requires a rejection of Einstein and I’m not ready for that.  Another is that you skip states or have intermeidate unobserved states which seems to work fairly well (10^-28 to 10^34 is a scale change of 10^62 which is very close (in terms of galactic hand grenades) to 10^64 which would be two states larger than matter (2^4 to 2^6).  The next higher state suggested (10^512) would take a whole mess of black holes to reach, but so would the next linear state of 2^6.  The final and best choice relates actual observation to mathematical calculation.  We find these discrepancies for plank length vs fundamental length of particles observed.  There are different ways to calculate plank length and different ways to define mass.  It means that the reliance on the electron scale or Planck Mass scale is unwarranted.
If we reject Electron Scale, Proton/Neutron Scale and Planck Mass scales we are left with nothing more than informational states, but there are worse places to be in terms of a starting point.  We know, for example, according to relativity that photos have gravity but no mass.  The transition of states (2^n to 2^n+1) must have features converting matter in ways that are not immediately obvious because they stick into “dimensions” that we don’t perceive or come out of dimensions that we don't perceive.  Perceive may include understand.  Some of the length can be seen going outward into places that we do not accurately measure in black holes.  Finding these locations, determining how informational states yield position, understanding how weights vary in terms of theoretical stability (e.g. Planck Mass) and actual stability (electron and quark products) and  will be important.  Will we find different informational state, will the interaction of states change the way that the end product is measured and weighed, how it is stabilized and destabilized?  We are only up to 5 of 10.

Likewise there is no intermediary particle observed between a black hole and a concentration of matter having characteristics of stability; but that doesn't mean that such particles do not exist.

So what is this 17 billion sun version of the black hole?  Clearly it is not much different that a larger atom or a molecule perhaps.  In between the individual units of the black hole you would find the compressed type of matter that you find around the event horizon.  This compression is such that there is not much room for space, photons or energy, but those states would probably be transitional states.

This model gives rise to the question of what you would see around a helium atom.  We have been led to expect that there's a lot of space in there.  While the gravity is not enough to join everything together, we know that there are unique forces at work and it is possible that the forces at work are such that energy is held within the minimum matter state in a similarly fluid arrangement, presumably transitioning between photonic forces and ever temporary matter states.  Of course, because there gravitational effects are less, we might want to discount that, but we're working with the same equations and as r becomes very small, the effect on the masses makes them approach infinity whether we like it or not, that is we are at very small separation distances compared to the mass and there are reasons to believe that some similarities exist.

In fact, it seems likely that the very substance of matter is related to the transition state, the matter-event horizon and the relatively fluid transitions that can occur here.

To better understand the coordinate dimension disconnect, a simple example can be examined.  To do this we will look at linear changes for a single point with 4 coordinates where each point changes with the addition of 1.  This is vastly oversimplified where you have compression states and negative states corresponding to positive states, but the example works well to understand time.  For this example you have a point (P) having coordinates (x,y,z,t)

Pa(1,3,5,6) to Pb(2,4,6,7).  What can be seen here is that an observer at coordinate t might not experience a change as it moves, but would observe the change in the other points.  Since only the change is visible, the movement of the points is what we perceive and what we perceive as time.  The three that are seen are the changing together or the perception would not be possible.  The change must be common for multiple particles through compression in order to observe change on a large scale.

So dimensions are not dimensions.

Coordinates are not dimensions

Multiple coordinates identify the position of one quantum time point relative to another, but there is always some separation unless compression is sufficient (temporarily or permanently) to allow new forces to come into play, or to amend the existing forces, by increasing the informational efficiency of the clock time by a complete state (integer 0, 1, 2, 3, etc) as each ct state transitions to the next.  In between transitions, there appears to be sufficient concentration to allow for transitional states to exist, at least for high density matter (radioactive isotopes) and high enough density black holes to have quasar characteristics.

It can be presumed that the force changes that allow black holes to stay together, super-dupe strong and weak forces for lack of a better name; correspond in some way or derive in some way from the strong and weak forces holding energy together in sufficient concentrations to be stable and, when sufficient amounts of matter are formed in proximity (radioactive isotopes) to create transition states.

The lower the clock time of the point in question, the fewer simultaneous changes define the position at once but the faster they can occur.

Coordinates correspond in function to information on the location of a point and to a bit of information with two states.

We theorize this process continues indefinitely, each transition occurring where r goes to zero (in the gravity equation) meaning at an infinite concentration of the prior state which much "jump" from this near infinity to the next higher clock time.  At some point in time, the transition "jumps" to non-linearity and we start the process over again.

This, of course, is an over simplification, but all the operative components are present.

The "measurement" of the these relative black holes (point black holes vs the orbit of neptune) provides additional support for the theory, because the "space" perceived must be occupied by something, in this case the transitional material at high concentrations, true for black holes, and presumably true for lesser energy states, even those as dispersed in terms of concentration as wave energy.  There appears little dispersion in photonic states and photons appear to be point sources themselves, but we should not be fooled by our prejudices since we know that a unique transition of force occurs from the prior discussions.