First, why do we need a puzzle? After all, we can be pretty certain that CT1-CT5 exists, not just because of the math involved but also because it lines up well with information theory? The answer is that math is not reality. Math is just math. As long as the math explains reality, it's pretty helpful, but the prior post shows that what we like to think of as reality is much more complicated.
So what is the puzzle? The puzzle is what is the proper scale to measure clock times? We have shown that using mass is not a great way to do it. First, at CT0-CT3 states mass doesn't really mean a whole lot. We know why CT states all have gravity, but we don't know why some show mass differently. It is all fine and good to argue that CT coordinate shifts are inaccurate because mass doesn't work perfectly on scale, but that attributes an inordinate amount of "weight" to mass. Mass doesn't deserve unless we can attribute mass to space or non-linearity.
Another candidate is dimension. This candidate is a little better because coordinate change translates well into dimension. The problem that comes up, however, is very similar. Space appears to have no dimension (changing in only one coordinate at a time it wouldn't be very space like). Even so, a type of dimension is inherent in a coordinate based system. The problem with our traditional method of measuring lies in what happens during coordinate shifts. Black holes, for example, are point sources in the universe, at least potentially. We have shown earlier that "large" dimensional black holes are merely point sources which are separated by space, energy, matter, and the transitional forms that these transition between that are discussed above.
The universe is incredibly complicated, but NLT is elegant. Somewhere the transition between elegant and complex has to be explained. We know that NLT requires a steady state universe, one that has no entropy or randomness, yet we experience a transition of events that we interpret as entropy and randomness. We even experience and "act" as if we have self awareness and self determination. In a NLT universe, which clearly appears to be the case, even these features appear to have a "dream like quality" in that they do not exist, and yet we perceive them.
I write about us "changing the code" but in an NLT universe, we've already done whatever we're going to do. We can't change the code, we cannot escape the matrix. If we did, the theory goes, we would not exist. It isn't escaping the universe, it is only escaping linearity.
So the question of what the proper measurement is becomes problematic. The "information" theorists say, largely correctly, that we are measuring "information". Obviously, CT states are information states to some extent, they act like information in terms of exponential function. But information is as vague a description as time coordinates.
No, time coordinates, time information, whatever "word you use is inadequate to the task. For one reason, the words don't describe the feature changes. The addition of dimension, mass, energy and whatever is shown by the compression of black holes, even the explanation as to why the is inconsistency in units, the creation of mass and then the failure of mass to work internally (the failure of Planck mass vs observed quantum matter) and externally (the failure of the mass of black holes to properly correspond to exponential combinations of minimal mass, even though it appears to correspond largely to Planck predictions). But in this, there are clues. The clues, for example, include the fact that Planck mass doesn't correspond with observed mass. It shows that the interaction of different informational states involves much more than a simple observed quantity. Instead it has to do with something that is not observed clearly and not directly related to dimension or to mass, not to energy or to anything else that is tangible, but relates directly to each of those.
So there is your mystery. And we must solve it in 4 posts. So what do you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment