Pages

Friday, June 7, 2013

How accelerating along an axis changes the time using e-hologram theory (1 of 3)

How accelerating along an axis changes the time using e-hologram theory (1 of 3)
If we accept that the change in integration is the equivalent in time, we have proof that dimension exist because of time.  So what gives with relativistic principles of "time" for two masses changing speed relative to one another.  Let's see how close we can get without giving away the secret to faster than light travel (Ha!).
First, let's look at a side issue: Is there "one time" as indicated by old theories or do there have to be four times or is three enough? Let's look at the evidence.
First, using integration, you have to move with a change in each of three directions.
The change is there and because we move in all three dimensions at once, time must move simultaneously in all three directions together.
This means that either proximate times merge or that there is one change covering all three directions at once.  Whether there is one time, three or four in e-hologram theory, and we'll get there, something funny happens when you accelerate one block of matter relative to another and this can be explained in terms of time and that should be explained using the "snakes" of integration and we're going to do just that!
Now lets accelerate two blocks of matter away from each other.  The single vector from which they depart changes their times relative to one another, an observed phenomena.  If you circle the earth, or go to the moon and back, you get a similar result.  The change rate changes for the faster moving relative to the slower moving.
What does this say about the time that each experiences when you are using integration...i.e. changing the rate of movement along an axis on a line where the "change rate" of one line is different from the change rate along another axis?  Does it require that we allow space and time to separate or does the movement at a higher speed along a vector somehow justify the change in the rate of the time and still allow for time to create dimension. 
Remember that the equation for this indicates that as the speed of light is approached, the time change for the faster moving object goes to zero and the time change for the slower moves towards infinity, so this movement must.
If allow (or assume) that space is a function of time, this should simplify the analysis.  That is we are integrating both, but we are integrating one set of time faster along an axis and the result can be seen mathematically as simple.
Let us examine this with you and me integrating.  If we get back to our snakes, you have 3 snuggling snakes with three dimensions and the movement in any one direction has an effect on that dimension's time we should be able to easily explain this, but let's start with one lonely snake but two different masses, me and you.
We are both drawing a line (integrating), but lets say that you draw your line faster than me (i.e. you are moving along an axis faster than I am, maybe you are better at math/calculus than I am).  You will finish your line faster than I do.  Aaaaa Ha!  There is a change in the speed with which the tendencies experience time in the change in time being calculated more quickly! 
Now the change appears, at first blush,  to be the opposite result that you would expect.  That is if you change faster along an axis (draw faster along an axis), you would expect to age faster relative to me along that axis and this would separate time from space somehow or make one a mirror image of another...or something else.
This paradox is fairly easy to deal with and will be dealt with in time (am I really that funny?); but the key for the moment is that you do see that there is necessarily a disconnect in change as the relative movement occurs which has become intuitive in e-hologram theory where "time" and therefore the rate of change along an axis (time giving space meaning) changes when you integrate faster relative to a slower integration along any sets of axis.
While one or multiple times can have the same result, the math is a little different and we'll get to that in a 'timely' manner.


Love as a dimension

No comments:

Post a Comment