NLT-the next step 51: Einstein Revisited

The mountain air has been good for me in a very temporary way.  I feel both more enlightened and freed by the distance and temporal separation from my real problems.  It is too short a time to be a vacation, and too filled with necessary events to be relaxing; but there is the different perspective that even poor travel gives.
The melancholy with which my life is filled is seen from a distance here and it allows me to see those things that are important and those that are not.
Next week is almost here and the last of my "pre-life" requirements; not that there will not be post life requirements to fill in the gaps that would otherwise be filled with freedom, if not happiness.

EINSTEIN REVISITED
NLT is a math exercise which seems to follow philosophical concepts of mysticism.  In it there are many different routes, as many as there are pre-existing, inadequate fundamental physics concepts.  While original in a sense, the basic concepts date back 2500 years and were obvious even with fundamental mathematics and the logic of early philosopher mathematicians, Parminides and Zeno being the two most common references.
If you accept all paths at once (they ar mutually exclusive in many cases) NLT includes a type of god where the concentration of all thought without dimension or time to separte them gives them a "god-like" power, perhaps enough to give linearity to the universe; the same features of time giving rise to prognosticaton and and, the subject of this chapter, predestination.
This is already supported by one concept of Einstein's philosophical rambling, "The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once".  But there is another, more compelling.  "God doesn't play dice with the universe."  The Heisenberg uncertainty principle has already been debunked in NLT although you may not have that chapter, it is inherent in what is already written.  While using traditional physics you are limited, severely, by using one aspect of time to view another, if you are looking fundamentally at time, there is no interference of the same form.
There is a subtle difference between prognotication and predestination.  The most basic logical formulation if a=b then b=a mandates a closer relationship if one accepts that god doesn't play dice.  This reference to god is misplaced and is unrelated to the god that Einstein was referring to or the one that is the concentrtation of thought.  God in this case refers to the fact that everything happens at once without linear time in a singularity unseparated by time and space at least in a linear format.  It refers to the force that causes this to be expressed linearally.
And if the processes of linearity are not randomized, if there is no cosmic set of dice, then one can predict, with adequate mathemtics outcomes.  And if one can predict what will happen with certainty (whether the computational equipment is available or not to actually do it) then everything is predestined from the start unless one has the ability to insert a random event which would both insert dice into the non-dice universe and make time something somewhat greater than the separation of events and therefore dimensions.