NLT the next thing: 63 The two faces of Black Holes

I leave out the words "in theory".  It gets sort of redundant and tears up the flow.  Everything in NLT is new except for the fact that it builds on things which are already known.  Perhaps "new" and "theoretical" are the wrong words to use.  Perhaps it would be better to say that people have been staking these blocks the same way for 2500 years (at least) and that I am restacking them in a slightly different way, but that is what "theory" usually is. Every once in a while we make quantum leaps in our stacks.  There is Parminides who voiced the failure of perception to define the illusory universe, the first of our ancestors (alas un-named) to perceive the super-order requirement of the universe-predestination or god/gods, and perhaps Moses recognizing a type of "singularity" super order that defies perception but somehow controls our fate, the first of the quantum superstate theory.  Then there is the long list of known and unknown physicists (in this case ending with me, but certainly not ended) who gave us quantum, relativity, and a whole host of explanations perhaps if you don't like ending with me, ending with Hawkins who didn't invent Hologram Theory but who explained it sufficiently broadly to allow the NLT stacking of the same blocks in the unique way they are stacked.
For those of you who have read the Einstein Hologram Universe, you know that traditional physicists are a few steps behind me.  First they need to work out their hologram concept and get to the singularity and then they need to move on to Non-linear time.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/29/space-hologram-experiment-two-dimensions_n_5726262.html
This article shows that those of you who read my work are actually two steps of traditional mathematicians and perhaps before NLT becomes commonplace there will be a third level.  For now, look at where everyone else is and pat yourself of the back for reading this tripe.

NOW AVAILABLE EDITED ON AMAZON

The two faces of Black Holes
But this chapter is about the two faces of black holes and that brings us back to theory vs fact.  In a Parmidean universe, there are precious few "facts".  For something to truly survive as a "fact" you have to be able to trace it back and while NLT starts in the "pre-universe" and moves outward; the second we try to "look around" in the "pre-universe" (non-linear universe) we run into the same problems that everyone else has run into since the scientist we'll call "UG" decided that there must be something more than what we perceive with our hands and created the predecessor of the god of Moses, Christ and Mohammad (apparently all the same quantum god, albeit with different rules for different peoples).  The problem I refer to, of course, is that someone had to create the Einsteinian "place" where time is non-linear and everything happens at once without dimension," the proverbial C+ science grade of some pre-celestial third grader.  The problem, of course, is not fully defining the environment of NLT, a challenge, but one that NLT theory may be up for in terms of theory, at least, but instead asking, "ok, we know all about NLT, but how did NLT come to exist and what is "next to this singularity" what makes up the proverbial god or third grader.  So all fact is fantasy, or all fact is theory if you would.  While we must rely on facts as we presume them, NLT and predestination, as much fact as the next thing, indicate that the "facts" are irrelevant.  Say you want to build a smart phone.  Under the theories of NLT and predestination you've already done it.  "Facts" that you have to rely on to construct it are nothing more than things which have already happened displayed with linearity.  And you don't need NLT to prove this.  The very "facts" (physics, math, chemistry) that you use to build your phone require this to be the case, otherwise phones would randomly work, there would be a set of dice to the universe, you'd go back to one of the "primitive" pre-NLT theories where the are all these multiple universe where each one resulted from a different dice role.  This is not to say that there are not an infinite number of third graders making an infinite number of C+ science projects, but only recognizes that our particular universe is merely the "projection" of non-linearity on a singularity.  The fact that there may be other third graders or that the third grader may have moved on to the 4th grade means that all "facts" in our universe are merely theories, which brings us, not surprisingly, to the two faces of black holes.
The first face of a black holes is the traditional face, that NLT saw as a final victory of "gravity" over linearity.  This was the snake eating itself theory (SEIT) of NLT which survives to this day.  Time and space appear to disappear, all black holes can be "seen" to the extent that we see anything going back to a non-linear state and we are back at NLT.  It is a great picture and one of the foundational blocks of Non-linear time theory.
Unfortunately, NLT has a tendency to undermine its own foundation, at least from our point of reference.
Remember, this chapter is a continuation of the chapter discussing what is the higher energy state.  So when we look at "black holes" we can, under the SEIT version of things say that black holes represent a "return" to the original state of "potential".
Unfortunately, while solving equations for NLT, we came up with the exponential compression model which was also suggested by none other than our "friend" the black hole.  With friends like that around, you had better have a couple of buddies who are physicists.
This second face of black holes suggests that black holes are merely the next level of exponential compression (another coordinate is changing at the same time as the others) and we can expect a type of "super standard watch time".  This suggests that you have infinite levels of exponential compression (ILEC).  ILEC suggests that our universe is one of an infinite number of universes and that somewhere out there you have "people" made up of CT5 who look at CT4 (us) and lower states and bemoan the fate of any "being" who can only think in 4 dimensions, who can only hold one thought at a time.  These CT5 people, in turn, are frowned upon by CT6 people and so on and so forth.
Which third grader is greater in such a scenario?  The third grader who made NLT and put it on a shelf (getting a C-plus grade from...what?) or the third grader made up of CT5, CT6 or CTinfinity who is looking backwards?  Are any of these third graders free from pre-desitinaiton?  Certainly the "math and physics" vary slightly as we go to higher and higher CT states, but all are still functions of a single point, a single state of non-linearity creating everything.
And this brings us back to "energy states".  If ILEC trumps SEIT then are black holes to be considered less energetic?  Black holes are gobbling up everything in our universe, apparently even space (although under ILEC space is merely one component within the CT5 state represented by black holes) but are they also some "less energetic state?"
It all brings us to the next chapter.