Pages

Tuesday, September 1, 2015

nlc-2nd part of the discussion of ct3-space as ct1 unwinding

I have been struggling with exhaustion and nausea which go together for me.  Travelling and staying out late and on the road especially seems to bring on the inner ear problems, not that you care.  Still, I managed to make enough headway into these edits to want to post the second part of this most unusual part of NLC.
Rich food (the gumbo shop, which is good, but not as good as Constantine's-those Greeks could really cook when I was a child.  Where are they now, I wonder) didn't help so I'm just eating organic fruit the rest of the week.
How much progress I'm making with my life is dwarfed, however, by my limited progress here. Frustrating, isn't it?

Anyway, you don't care, maybe you shouldn't care, but we're going to discuss the unwinding of the universe and why we don't spontaneously see space turn into photonic energy but why we might see the results of it happening a long time ago, a long, long time ago...

We can solve several problems at once. The first troubling one is the fact that we don't see any evidence of the unspiralling of the universe, we don't see the spontaneous conversion of space into photonic energy, we know that gravity comes from unwinding, but gravity remains different from the other observed phenomena of compression.  
The initial unwinding should leave some sort of background image-it’s big after all, be clearly irreversible , differentiable but very similar to the winding of the spiral and go to the extent of the universe itself.  What could fill this requirement?  It  could be space itself.  The concentration of space from the point of complete concentration (everything happening at once without dimensional separation) would be extremely high allowing, with the unwinding of space, the compression of part of space to turn a portion of space into photonic energy which could restart the “winding” or “compression” algorithm.
This is not supported by any particular mechanism, but serves the purpose of providing an observable phenomena (space) which comprises a great deal of information which is spread out far enough to encompass an unwinding spiral of information before compression takes on in earnest.  What this would indicate is that CT1 is “unwinding” and that everything else is the winding of the spiral; both being merely algorithms to “display” data.  This would explain the difficulty of additional transformation of information from the space to the photonic energy since this transition only happens at very high concentrations of space which do not occur because it is “unwinding” and having “unwound” completely at the beginning is fully uncompressed until the forces of compression are strong enough to concentrate space itself towards the end of the spiral cycle.  It should be relatively easy to calculate the forces involved, but that will be saved for later.
What then is light speed that it cannot be crossed?  Under the “information” logic, it is nothing more than the amount of change necessary to return to the prior state.   It may be thought that instead of speeding up to lightspeed, you are actually slowing down coordinate changes as you accelerate towards non-linearity in one coordinate while minimally changing the others. While this suggests a much smaller number than the “speed” of light; it must be remembered that this change takes place in very, very small fractions of a second (distance, not actual seconds, of course) and this calculation (done above as approximately 10^1/39th of a second) means the movement over this small fraction is over a very short distance (using 3x10^8 m/s for light speed you arrive at at the range of 10^/31 of a meter in this analysis but you can also use the more direct planck length for the distance analysis 1.6x10-35).
As has been indicated, all change is in one direction.  We work within a middle range where we can, as a result of the physics which controls our actions (the illusion of self determination), slow down or speed up change within this narrow range.
The minimum speed of light merely represents the amount of room, distance, between two quantum time states.
We can calculate that in a single instant the net amount of change is equal to one unit but we also have to determine what the length of that instant.  The unit of change is a single coordinate change in a system.
      Time is nothing more than the number of state changes along the spiral.
      Putting these concepts together we can calculate with some certainty the features of the spiral, if you’re willing to make some simple assumptions.  We should be able to eliminate time in terms of dimension in defining the spiral.
      This is the same analysis as given above.  Using the speed of light, a second is equal to the square root of 299,792,458m^2 or 17,314 meters.  Using Planck length, as the “minimum length allowed by the universe (1.62x10^-35M/line width in this case) you can see that there are 1.07x10^39 changes in a coordinate in a single second which explains why we don’t see these changes and gives a detailed definition of what an “instant” is.  It is one 1.07x10^39th of a second.
      NLC provides a solution to an infinite series (pi) by providing a limit beyond which additional manipulation doesn’t matter.  It will be shown here that the end of the series comes at the point where the curve changes at the 1.07x10^39th place in the infinite series equation, because beyond that there is no change. This fixes pi and the number of changes based on the curve in the spiral assuming a single spiral (360 degrees) if you know the number of changes which, of course, can be calculated assuming that all the information in the universe (using the conversion rate of 2^n) begins (at zero degrees) completely uncompressed (individual times change independent of each other as space) and ends completely compressed (all time coordinates changing together-everything happening at once) at 360 degrees.  The total amount of information in the universe can be estimated easily from the total amount of gravity, but you end up with nothing more than estimates.

And there you have it.

No comments:

Post a Comment