Do we need a reason to regret the time apart more, to act to find a solution more quickly? It seems unlikely, to me. Perhaps if there was less time than the less represented by the Fibonacci series universe, so how do we shorten it further?
The overlaps of the opposite running spirals are worth considering. For example, it is possible that we are in a trasition between compression states, in the place on the intersecting lines (one of them anyway) after the overlap (for this discussion we'll say after the overlap of the ct6 level which, using ct1 as the outgoing spiral would be 2.5 spirals in since there are two overlapping areas for each complete 360 degrees). In this model whether we are in a spiral within the area between transitions or in lines along the transition lines between collisions (since we don't see more compression) or within a collision (since we see at least some compression) we need to ask is there one big bang, or is there are reason to consider in the universe that compression between states only happens periodically in the universe.
We should ask what happens at each of the collision states (where two spiraling lines intersect) or do they merely represent different time orbits.
If each compression state is an actual "stretch" of time, can we still say that the big bang starts outside of the last compression state.
It remains possible in this scenario that each state appears to be outgoing from the next state, that is that ct2 appears to be outgoing from another higher state. Perhaps we can only see so many states back and there are more outgoing states.
Which big bang, in such a case, is the big bang. It remains possible that the big bang that we are looking at is a massive conversion that occurs periodically, in this case allowing for, perhaps, ct6 states. In such a case, we could look at "our" universe" as being nothing more than the transition state between compression at the ct5 level (with lesser states remaining because of the 55% rule) meaning that at some point in time, long before we would expect the ctx-2, ctx-1 transitions, we could see an apocalyptic transition from ct6 as the highest compression state to ct7 (in this example). It would, if one accepts this type of process, be possible to envision that we could calculate where we were based on the same analysis used before, but we would, after the passage of several billion years, be much closer to the end of the period of relative tranquility between the collision/overlap states. One has to imagine what the meeting head-on of two lines would look like and how it would, in such an event, represent 55% of time in one direction followed by a F-series lower time period times 100% of more uncompressed state followed thereafter by another partial compression state approximately 1/2 of 45% of the way into the next cycle which will, appear the next stage of the compressed universe as another big bang.
These "explosive" collisions, contemplated by this potential outcome would "blow" each universe outward until the gravity of the super dense state and the reduced size (length) of the collision state would allow the successive universes to start shrinking; thereby providing a model for an expanding universe followed by a shrinking universe whether done explosively or by way of systemic changes. In any case, the amount of "free space" showing up as separation gradually decreases as more compression occurs.
It is a compelling model, but as I've indicated, it is only one way of approaching a problem which suggests solutions, but any one approach can be given a life of its own without being the best approach. While I am serious when I tell you that I will never move on, I am going to have to move on from here or this treatise will never be finished. Arrivederci adesso Fibonacci. For you, I don't know why you say goodbye, I say ciao.
No comments:
Post a Comment