I'm getting close to the end of this. It has been grueling and the most complicated part has yet to come, but in a theory which is almost self proving, these models can be helpful for "exploring" the uncertain portions of the theory.
Spiral theory is inspired both the the solution to pi. Of course, there cannot be a true solution to an infinite theory of approach which by its very definition cannot reach an end point as long as there are numbers to add, but it does provide a minimum point-theoretically-beyond which division becomes unnecessary. Further, by eliminating dimension in favor of information theory and algorithms to express the information you reach the point where the "mystery" of pi is easily explained.
While the nay-sayers out there, like Hawkins who is so far too uninformed to chime in (assuming he doesn't know I exist), would argue that the theory fails to explain dimension which we "clearly" experience, such pre-NLC thinking forgets that having dimension is much more difficult to explain than having it as an illusion. The reason I say this is because there is no reason for anything to exist and therefore "any" existence is improbably, the more complicated (time, space, etc) the more improbable. A universe made of pure information (especially binary expressions which only have two opposing states) is much easier to grasp theoretically.
Philosophically and historically this has, in the less cavalier space-time based theories, been satisfied by having either one or more improbable 'god' which is much to complicated to exist, embodying a greater complexity than the universe itself or a background matrix which is equally improbable. While neither of these is adequately replaced by NLC, at least all nlc requires is information in a pure two dimensional vibrational sense (albeit vibration without dimension by virtue of having two states).
The idea is that there is nothing, but that includes time. No nothing, no time. In such an environment, there is no limitation to how much a very small amount of information can do. It is, mathematically, the equivalent of a large number of monkeys on a large number of typewriters "randomly" producing the encyclopedia Britannica. The idea that randomness figures into the process is not totally 'outrageous' at some level but it is not the randomness that we experience; it would have to be a randomness that was not time or space based because once either of those is put into the equation you have to have a foundation for the universe which is too improbable to accept. This is not philosophy, it is cold, naked logic. Of course it is the cold, wet, naked logic of g-space which is something to be reckoned with as an environment where our logic may have little merit, possibly even a place where gods can exist with precursors.
THE DESIGN OF THE SPIRALS
While the NLC-FC provides one model, using “known” clock time states, a fairly clear logical pre-requistes for each separate spiral (winding and unwinding) it is less than satisfying when viewed from the standpoint of how this algorithm works with multiple spirals and with the expression of the results (as space time) where different “orbits” defined by the number of collisions of winding and unwinding spirals allow for changes at different rates along a primary spiral. The logic behind this is that there are “primary” spirals which control all movement and the secondary, tertiary, etc spirals define other states along this primary spiral.
The drawing shows only a single spiral, but prior discussions, indicate that while a single data point can define the entire universe and all the spirals (it has all the time in the universe to do so since it is in a timeless/dimensionless g-space) it must “build” on this one spiral flow with other spiral flows in order to provide the necessary complexity of interaction that eventually yields the illusion of self determination we have and, presumably, much higher potentials in that arena at higher time states and at greater concentrations.
It is also clear that there are many different models possible. Coming up with the best one, with no budget, is more than I’m going to do this morning. Some suggestions can be easily envisioned.
One likely result is that the secondary spirals run off each other and off of the primary spiral. These are not actual events, instead they are reflections of the pi type regression towards the original point or outward towards the maximum amount of information in the universe. Since the possibility exists for the information to expand forever, this non-bounded universe, should be considered along with the more likely data fixed universe (a maximum amount of information).
If the other spirals run off the primary spiral (which looks much like a primary time clock from the standpoint of linearity) then it would seem that a ct3, 4, 5 or larger state could reconnect with This indicates that spirals run off of other spirals, but this later case is counter indicated because this would involve lines “jumping” from the primary spirals up to the higher spirals. Of course, distance is illusory, so its not as much of a problem. There has to be the ability of spirals to end before the final spiraling in up to a point to allow for state changes in both directions (fusion and fission for example). It is important to understand, while considering this, that these are algorithms, not actual spirals and hence, as long as there are simple, two state models for the interaction, they can be almost anything.
The two, primary, two state models are: 1) the informational “plus/minus” of information and the increase/decrease regression of pi (4/1-4/3+⅘-4/7+4/9 etc). This “regression” is almost identical to the information plus/minus except that the odd number features figure into it. A better equation might be 2/1-2/1+2/1...etc but this process gets us nowhere, 0 to 2 to zero to 2. One could also envision an even more simple progression 0/1-1/0+0/1-1/0-0/1 which is what the singularity should look like (nothing, negative infinity, nothing, negative infinity) but there are “gaps” in the process as zero is added to infinity. Nevertheless, g-space probably starts in this fashion. That it might develop around several version of the pi type regression (the 2/1, 3/1, 3/2, etc mean that those who hold out for multiple universes may yet have some place to look although those would be confusion universes, including the ones that are suggested 5/whatever,6/whatever, whatever/whatever.
For the moment, let’s focus on our universe; where I am spending the weekend without you and, for better or worse, without knowing what you are up to, what you are doing with your regressions.
No comments:
Post a Comment