And now to sum it all up:
A DISCUSSION OF THE NLC-FLUX CAPACITOR DRAWINGS
The singularity plus the display algorithm (unspiralling and spiralling) indicate a point of origin of the universe. This includes only the part of it we live in, g-space remains mysterious. It does suggest a steady state universe.
In the model, there appear to be one or more "overlap" points circles. This could, for example, represent the point where the spirals change direction (violently), but before we get too excited about these "points" of overlap, we must remember that these are algorithms and the representation in two dimensions is not required, one of these curves might be perpendicular to the other (to take an extreme case) and the common point might be the point where pi is solved due the the failure of information to break down past that point.
The overlap may be relevant given the requirements for changing the direction of the curve so radically which is, after all, offset by the forces of a collision. If you consider this collision as showing up as a single overlap in the “one outward curve, one inward curve (one/one) example; then the type of forces inherent in this (e.g. enough to cause the type of conversion we have from dark to non-dark matter).
Likewise, in the other models where the number of intersecting points (multiple/multiple or multiple/one) equals the number of spirals, one can posit that there is a separate spiral for each clock time state and one can then posit that the overlap at each point provides the energy required for a conversion to the next higher compression state. In this case, at each point in overlap, there is inherent in the overlap the inclusion (running in the opposite direction as you view the intersection) another spiral. That is, you can view “compression as time running in one direction and time running in the other direction off of it. While this is a beautiful model inherent in the picture, it doesn’t readily explain reversible nuclear phenomena but it is not inconsistent with “one way” compression, that is the idea that we only “slow down” or “speed up” certain clock time phenomena in favor of others but all time states (including all dimensions) only run in one direction.
The “drawings” of the NLC FC do not go out far enough to cover all of the time states. In fact, one sees only three such overlaps, three inward spirals with the fourth outward spiral but a better drawing would go out far enough to include all the time states which would be, presumably, at least half of the number equal to the total number of quantum gravity points.
Another alternative is shown by the fossilized Ammonite spiral shell, in particular, shows the three dimensional potential for variation (the possibility of other spirals off this primary spiral) while maintaining the basic principle.
There are (at least) two choices in spirals. The so-called perfect Archimedian and the observed logarithmic spirals:
I will include involute and Archimedean curves (AC) together to compare to logarithmic spirals for expediency.
AC-Involute spirals have successive curves with constant separation distance between the curves. Related Archimedean spirals are defined by having any ray from the origin intersect successive turnings in points with a constant separation distance (r=2Pib)
b=ln(Phi)/(Pi/2). Another way of looking at it is b=ln(phi)/90 degrees. Note that as r doesn't change for Archimedean spirals we are working with a single formula.
Logarithmic Spirals:
For logarithmic spirals b is a growth factor defined by a Fibonacci series (0,1,1,2,3,5,etc-two prior numbers added to make each third), unlike AC, r changes
r=ae^(btheta) where a and b are arbitratry positive constants, in this case a and b approach zero and are the quantum distance. Another way of looking at this is theta=1/b(ln(r/a) which makes theta (the angle) a linear function as the distance constants (a and b) approach zero which is what you'd expect given the illusion of linearity in the universe.
The initial quantum radius, the only radius, in such a spiral universe is defined by: r=ac^theta where c=e^b.
For the so called golden spirals, theta=1/b(ln(r/a).
For logarithmic spirals the arc length changes L=a/x*t1^2 for 0 (less than or equal to) t (less than or equal to t1)
We have these two types of equations:
For Logarithmic spirals
r=R(pi/2)n as r+R is greater than zero. In this case n is the number of turns of the spiral and this applies backwards to the spiral outward (n goes negative)
For archimedean spirals:
r=a+b(Phi)^1/c or r=2pib where b controls the distances between successive turns.
Why a universe of one type or the other? In this case, if there is a single turn, the difference between even these very different spirals seems negligible, but in our universe, we see a reflection of one, not the other.
In pine cones and sunflowers and spiral galaxies we see logarithmic spirals, and for pine cone and sunflowers, we see these running in intersecting opposite directions to form a matrix, just as we observe dimensional and force characteristics run in opposite directions in at least some of the equation hypothesis of NLC.
All natural spirals are logarithmic. If linearity is a reflection of non-linearity, it makes a lot of sense that nature would imitate the underlying symmetry of the universe. So for the moment, the prize goes to logarithmic spirals which makes sense since we are dealing with exponential compression which is indicated by the solution c=e^b. As mentioned, quantum separation where the minimum distance is 1/x where x is the total information at any point in the universe, means that compression may be the compression of a single coordinate at one time as long as the total change in the universe (assuming certain data can be changed by speeding or slowing it down, but not by going backwards) is equal to a single quantum change from the prior state.
There is overlap, then of the spirals going in one direction, and presumably this overlap can occur with spirals going in the other direction so that different “concentrations” of overlap can occur.
Going back to our **'s, you can go from:
***.****.*** to ****.***.*** or ***.***.**** or **.*****.*** etc but only one change can occur overall per quantum length along the spiral, otherwise you'd have a gap and there's nothing to fill it with because this spiral doesn't exist except as a mathematical formula governing the expression of data as it goes from a state of minimum compression to maximum compression (10^n as n goes from zero to x where x is all the data in the universe which may express slightly differently according to the spiral rule by change in one direction only at any quantum moment).
The universe only spins based on the application of algorithms to a fixed system. Spiral math and information theory are clearly critical to the analysis of NLC, but their interaction is far from clear.
As a quick review, NLC requires that the universe be fixed (unchanging) and that it be a singularity where an algorithm of spirals of one change at a time are combined (compression) to form exponentially higher algorithm (2^x where x is the number of combining spirals) where all dimensions (time is the illusory one) move in only one direction and perceived two directional movement is merely the relative slowing of one dimension in favor of another where all change is conserved.
Information theory allows the orbits to be defined by the algorithm for each successive orbit (compression state) to be defined by the intersection of two “oppositely traveling” intersecting spirals as long as (1) r, the (2) area within r (within the spiral between one r and another) or the (3) length of the spiral between intersections (r(s) equal for the two identical spirals) satisfies the equation:
x=a*2^n as n moves from 1-total amount of information
and y=-a*2^n for the two spirals and the solution defines the type of spiral required
where a is the formula for (1) 5, (2) area, or (3) length for a the two spirals.
Get your pen out if you're in a hurry, it's not difficult given the equation for the spirals.
From the outside (of the spiral) the curves would look like a straight line and changes (overlaps) would be far between relatively speaking, but if you looked close you'd see the presence of a spiral. As the spiral moves in and the number of information points shrinks exponentially, changes would happen with less time (distance) between but it is a fixed spiral, not a moving one. It doesn't matter as much, except for the speed (distance) between overlaps whether you are moving outward or inward since each point is fixed.
Indeed one spiral may even be irrelevant to the other except to the extent that intersects to change what we'll call time orbits.
The illusion of self determination lies in the ability to decide which time orbit single strands of information are in or how much one moves in a stacked orbit relative to the other strands in a stacked orbit within a massive number of different strands.
Black matter/energy is nothing more than space so what they say is "unobserved" is actually hiding in plain sight. It is information which is changing at such a high rate (one coordinate changing as fast as 4 coordinates for matter-us) that we don't see it, just as black holes are changing so slow we don't observe them directly (5 coordinates at once).
So the approximate location of where we are on the spiral is pretty easy to come by.
I'll use this (very inaccurate in most ways as it is obsessed with space time as are all pre NLC theories) article to give us our basic numbers: http://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/what-is-dark-energy/
Unfortunately, there are several numbers in this which causes me to give several answers to where we are. I.E. we're either here or there, but we're not everywhere. Well, technically we are everywhere, but where we are right this second is only a couple of place:
First the pure matter argument which allows you to see how much “space-dark matter” and force left over from the unwinding “68% dark energy”.
5% us (everything but dark stuff)
27% dark matter
This would put us somewhere behind (less than) the 1/6 point on the spiral. This "rough estimate" is based on the fact that some compression has affected 1/6th of the total information of the universe. We're really much closer to the beginning even in this estimate than the end because the level of compression (going towards 100% where everything happens at once) is done in stages, but at the stage we are at, we're closer to the 1/6th point as we are to anything beyond it. This is not "true movement" because it's only an algorithm of what already has happened, but if you were to graph the algorithm, that's where we'd be. Probably closer to 1% of the way out given the amount of compression left for us to go through to get to the higher compression states, but that's a more detailed analysis.
or
5% us
27% dark matter
68% dark energy
This puts us 5% of the way or less, presumably much less since the dark energy component of space would be less organized, less ready to become compressed information under the other guidelines. Applying the same idea that our compression is far from complete (we are 2^4, complete compression is 2^x where x =all the information in the universe at any quantum moment) we're far less than 1% of the way to the end, but it's up there.
Anyway, you asked. You are here.
The speed with which changes occurs is represented by the distance along the spiral between intersections in this example and the amount of curve observed at 5% is very low (almost a straight line). Towards the center of the NLC-FC, this curve would be much greater, changes in orbits much faster (overlaps occur in successively shorter distances). For this reason, we are in a location of relative calm (5% from the fully expanded universe) and you can imagine a fairly chaotic universe of huge gravity wells and rapid changes in state when you get to within 5% of the point of singularity.The illusion of self determination lies in the ability to decide which time orbit single strands of information are in or how much one moves in a stacked orbit relative to the others within a massive amount of different strands.
No comments:
Post a Comment