I'm pretty tired. In addition to my regular work I've been getting NLT theory ready to publish. This should be fairly easy, but its an undertaking given the work. In getting this ready, I had an occasion to look to see when I started this inquiry; something possible because it came as a part of this blog!
NLT has come a long way since it started. And guess what? It's almost exactly two years old! So in light of this, I will have a birthday celebration sans cake. Welcome to the party.
So where does NLT get it start? Apparently in a couple of posts:
SOLUTIONS IN NLT/EHT: It has been postulated that NLT can explain a universe
without real dimension. The list of “pre-NLT
mysteries” of the universe solved by NLT are listed in previous entries. So when did this revolutionary approach to Quantum Mechanics get its start:
The development of NLT has occurred
relatively quickly after the first entry on September 1, 2012. That reference was only a discussion of hologram theory. It was not conception, it was only a discussion of an interesting concept.
On September 2, 2012 under "plumbing the depths" this post appeared:
This is a holiday break from the war with china and the term limits arguments that will come up later. See the earlier posts if you want to follow that part of the blog
This examines some of the questions raised by current theories of the universe. This one, supported by some of the writings of Einstein, Hawkins (The Universe in a nutshell) and others, is not a finished model, so I take the liberty of assigning certain features to it which may or may not be consistent with the model.
One of those "assigned features" is that everything has already happened. Time is just a method of allowing someone to "walk around" the universe and see what is happening at any point in time, just as in a laser-hologram you can walk around in one direction and see a banana peeled and then go in the opposite direction and watch it closed back. Hence, one question of the hologram universe is whether it is possible to go around it and see in them the past and go in another direction and see the future.
We have seen that the past is visible and easily visited, at least on a macro scale. You do this every time you look into the night sky; starring eons into the past of galaxies and stars. Even when you see sunlight you are looking a short time in the past.
Light is the speed limit of the universe, at least in the dimensions that we live in, and it is also a way to walk around the hologram for distant objects. The fact that it does not, at least the way we have observed light so far, allow us to look at near objects in the distant past or any objects in the future raises the question of whether there is another way to look at light so this would be possible or to find the source of light or of the projection of the universe so that we could go walking around it. This would give us the perspective of the hypothetical "god" which presumably created the universe and who could, by walking around it, on a micro level, see the beginning and the end.
This is not science fiction if the hologram universe allows for this type of view and if it is merely a projection of something that already exists and but for the artifice of time has already happened. In fact, there is little reason to believe in the bubble theory that there are not an infinite number of universes, each with an infinite number of ways of things happening being viewed by whoever created them with interest or without interest just as some of us look into the sky with great interest and some out of boredom; why some see the full moon and are filled with romantic thoughts and others are merely aggravated that it is not dark enough to sleep.
In a future blog, perhaps we will discuss who is viewing these holograms. Are they exhibits in some god museum or are we merely the bubbles formed while some great being beyond the scope of our comprehension bubbles water for tea?
Then, on 11/8/12 this was written under the title: the "biblical relevance of hologram theory":
"In the beginning there a was a great void, which was hot and dense being filled with everything that would ever happen.
Then there was light which was the beginning of time. In a logical progression everything that was already there is a three dimensional framework moving outward from a central location was provided a surface on which to be displayed which was time.
This is the explanation of why time fits so poorly with the other dimensions. It is because the other dimensions are painted, or etched onto time.
Time expands in only one direction which explains why the universe where everything had already happened had to begin expanding.
Obviously on some level things may go in either direction and time is a fairly constant surface on which to paint events which have already happened so that at any given moment in time, everything is painted at once...or etched. Everything is actually etched. You etch in time, you don't paint in time.
Time need only move at one speed, probably the speed of light, as the universe gets bigger. Sometimes we feel like time is expanding faster or slower, but it is only a layer of material, an intangible material which we cannot feel and we cannot see but which may be the only material of relevance to someone watching the process of taking everything that has happened being etched onto the fabric of space and time...but it isn't etched on space, space is just something that is defined by things and things are etched only on time, there is no other surface.
The only question is how many times there are, how many universal fabrics. Each would receive everything that has already happened and everything that will happen.
If Einstein were here would he still say that time exists so that everything doesn't happen at once or would he instead say that everything has already happened and that time is a surface on which it is displayed in a linear fashion?"
The highlighted part above is the first peek, the first gasp, the beginning of NLT. So what we see here is the "germ of an idea" turning into a question over 2 months and 7 days. Then it turns into a full fledged theory over the following 2 years. The blog includes coffee and non-coffee, affection and betrayal, poems and prognostication, love and loss, emotional and physical blindness, all over 24 months. And there on October 8, 2012 captured like a photograph is the moment of genius. It is the apple falling onto Newton, Einstein picturing himself falling (like the apple) and, of course, it is Archimedes shouting Eureka as his bathwater spills over the floor of a Greek bath house, of course it is.
Now some of you may be questioning the brilliance of Non-linear time theory and who knows, perhaps you are correct. However, that is a mere technicality. It either is brilliant or it is not. But either way, the flash is there, it is either a flash of genius or irrelevance.
I wish you what I cannot have, a good night -
No comments:
Post a Comment