Pages

Wednesday, September 10, 2014

NLT-the next thing 69 more on wave-particle duality

For those of you who look for NLT entries, their absence will be replaced by the publication shortly, time permitting.  I continue to move apace through the final edits.  Some times I think I should just stop and publish, the theory in its entirety, it already being published here other than a few remaining chapters, like this one which covers some perception issues that appear all over the science fiction matrix, although not in terms of Non-linear Time Theory.
Then, however, I'll come across a typo or a formulaic discussion that is just too, well "too too" as they say, to leave alone and I reconcile myself and you to wait a little longer for the publication.
And, of course, there are the demands of life and death.  Do you know how distracted I am by all of this, how much it reduces me as a person, assuming there was/is anything left to reduce.  An example is in order, perhaps.   I swam 3200 yards yesterday and realized that I was perhaps 1 or 200 yards away from having swum 10,000 yards in 5 days; but did not turn around to spend the additional 2-4 minutes it would have taken to set this accomplishment.  What do you say about a person like that?

Wave Particle Duality II
Another way of looking at the CT1-CT3 energy phenomena is to use the universe as a model.  In the model we see CT5 (black hole) states surrounded by CT1-CT4 states, the concentrations of those meaning that there are much more CT1 than, more 2 than 3 and more 3 than 5 in terms of dimensional separation, anyway (the difference in compression distinguishing each successively greater state caused by the sharing of time orbits in the orbital model).  What this means is that we may extrapolate and assume in any wave energy (CT3 energy state) there is CT2 energy states (photonic) so that the duality is the result of the two states existing together just as CT5 states from a far enough distance might appear solid, but when you get to our level (CT4) you see all the elements around black holes (space, photons, wave energy, matter).
The same relative concentrations is why the do not appear separate (the scale of compression being much smaller) like we see in the CT3 to CT4 boundary and the even more obvious CT4-CT5 boundary.  The CT5 boundary is so great (10^32) that I have a hard time accepting black holes as separate clock times, but the evidence in favor of it seems great, even though the alternative (that black holes reflect non-linearity) is tempting.  The existence of gravity (the CT0-CT1 energy gradient) in black holes prevents us from accepting the non-linear model of black holes completely even though explanations can be given.  This in turn suggests a CT5-CT6 boundary of similar scale shift (10^64) which is so significant that we cannot see it from our Clock Time State (at least because we only look in terms of "waves" which are limited by light speed.  There are certainly other signatures of standard clock time (gravity for example) to consider, although clock time and light speed seem inter-twined, at least for us.
One can imagine the inhabitants of the CT5 and CT6 states as moving relatively ponderously given the increasing slowness of the changes of individual time coordinates but also having features of perception like super standard watch time and perhaps "super-duper" standard watch time for CT5 and CT6 respectively.
I wonder if the use of the term "super-duper standard watch time" distracts from the professional and profound nature of this discussion.

No comments:

Post a Comment