An aberration in time: Is the universe a movie or a true universe?
It is Sunday Morning and I wax religious on Sundays. Love wells up inside of me, not altogether religious, I might add. I'd like to be able to point to a specific religion and say, "aha, that's the one" relative to Non-linearity. That is not the case. Thankfully, my research hasn't picked one of the stranger one involving human sacrifice. Don't say that I sacrifice my happiness to a false god, even if it's true, for the same might be said about you...
The idea of everything happening at once is best explained as a movie and not a true universe. However even accepting predictability, the resulting continuity of events and lack of true randomness and self determination, and a set of exponentially greater time coordinate changes at once leading back to the singularity, we still have the possibility of a non-ID (intelligent design) universe. Intelligent design doesn't necessarily mean god, but the lack of a god or god like force resulting from the processes of a singularity is as hard to explain as the singularity itself.
This comes back to the idea that the universe is far too complicated to exist, too predictable to be random, too small as a singularity to yield true dimension, too full of intelligence not to have some hint of inherent intelligence as a singularity, albeit a hard to define intelligence since our type of intelligence has to have linearity to exist and by definition that is absent in the singularity.
The alternative is a little disturbing, but has a type of initiating randomness. I don't like it because it leads to the idea of true linearity (which seems counter-intuitive) and also multiple universes even though each of them would have the same predictability, maybe. That maybe opens the door for all the crazy universes that science predicts otherwise and we lose the elegance of the NLC universe, even though we gain "a grain" or, more correctly, "a quantum" of randomness. In this scenario, the "everything" that happens at once without time is less of a set of events, a set of movie scenes and more of a probability set that once set in motion can happen in a number of different ways. That, unfortunately, sounds like random events and you cannot have everything happen at once and still have random outcomes...or can you?
In order to understand this, you have to look beyond our universe of predictability where the effect of predictability, math, physics and order is to define predestination. Instead, the primordial singularity is more of a set of rules which govern the existence of non-linearity. God, or some other force, has the ability to act on this singularity, to "bump it" thereby creating an aberration in time, a type of non-linear vibration. Our universe results as the gradual return of the universe to a steady state after the "twanging" of this non-linear string. Oh and there is the mention of a string. This is not a physics string, just a metaphorical one.
The vibration set in motion changes the way that "time" is expressed, but doesn't change the rules that hold it together. The expression remains predictable, in the non-linear environment it continues to exist without non-linearity (the universe changes and doesn't change at the same time, perhaps) but as the non-linear vibration slowly changes, things go back to normal.
The "twang", as it were, is perceived by us as the big bang. A finite amount of time is set in motion to an inevitable "end" although what "end" means in such a case is subject to debate. The most likely "end" is the grand stage of the universe where all the coordinates begin to change at once in a unified order (we exist in a state where only 4 coordinates are changing at once in order, black holes 5, and this state would be one where ever single coordinate is changing together at once-see the last post), but because non-linearity includes a type of "infinite" time, this process may not actually have an end point.
The key point to all of this is not determining the beginning and end, instead the key point is that "initiating randomness-or apparent initiating randomness" sets the predictable universe in linear motion.
What "should" the "twang universe" look like.
Again there are several versions.
The one that pure circularity takes us to is one where there is a complete or near complete disorder in coordinate changes-each quantum time is changing one coordinate at a time, pure space. Gradually as the "vibration" subsides a bit, as the string which is "twanged" (twanging being the act of creation on Sunday mornings) some of the time coordinates begin to change together creating a certain amount of photonic energy which in turn leads to the changing of two coordinates at a time (even less "vibration") and we get the perceived "background radiation" of the big bang. Note that this doesn't require a great deal of dimension since perceived "separation" is not actual separation but is instead merely how changing coordinates appear to separate as they in fact come together. While you say "guffaw" to this, and rightly so as a creature of linearity, it appears possible since as we go from non-linearity to space to black holes (skipping a few steps) and (skipping even more sets) the super-dup black hole time states where "all time coordinates" are changing together we necessarily are going from non-linearity back to non-linearity even though we pass through all the states of matter in the universe on the way.
Now I am not going to go too far into this in this blog. To accept any of this as "fact" you'd have to give me a nobel prize and label me a genius and no one is about to do that...unless they already have, lol. But there are a couple of matters yet for Sunday morning before I move on, not that I will ever move on if you know what I mean, for I am true to some things, as inevitable as the predictability of the universe is. I can never move on, trapped in an orbit that holds me as tightly as any black hole holds anything else. :)
This last bit has to do with the "building" of the universal organization as the twang begins to reach its end. According to this rule (suggested rule) the universe as it ages must have time states that build from the initial total randomness of total space to a state of non-randomness where everything happens at once as it goes from the twang state (big bang if you must) to the non-linear state of the "super-dupe black hole" or non-linearity from which the universe sprang. What is so weird is that if you accept the multi-dimensionalist view of things, you have a "god rock band" twanging away or non-linear instruments generating universes in gawsh awful protrusion, each one infinitely predictable (going from twang back to non-linearity) but in the interim each distinct "note" yielding its own universe.
Enough! for now... (I sound like a 1940's science fiction movie).
No comments:
Post a Comment