nlc-more on harmonics-the very instant of the big bang

Wave lengths only exist in linear space.  There is no length in non-linear space so there can't be wave "length".
  There could be the coordinates of a wave, however.  Since wave lengths can be very long, and in all cases are longer than point energies (photons) and since photons are necessarily larger than space, even if only by a factor of 2 or 4, it stands to reason that the initial, universe forming wave length is of no length whatsoever.
The only way to envision this is to say that it includes at least some, which in non linearity means (at least in theory) all non linear points connected by virtue of their coordinates changing simultaneously in the pre-big bang (big thrumb, if you will) state.
L=n/2(lamda) where lamda is the wavelength.  L=n/2(0)
The length of the wave is twice the length of the string, but both are equal to zero in non-linearity.
The speed of the wave =frequency x wavelength.  Again, speed is zero in a non-linear environment so the wavelength and frequency must be zero.
The frequency of the nth harmonic = n*first harmonic so there is no possibility of length there.
Therefore the wavelenght of the nth harmonic =(1/n) x first wavelength
The sound comes out from the frequency sin(frequency (eg hertz)x pi x t) where t is in seconds and there are no seconds in non-linearity.
When you change any point (or all points) from changing simultaneously and in coordination, and only then, do you have the possibility for linearity and a true wavelength.  In this case, traditional physics dictates that the first step in non linearity is space, religious doctrine would say photonic light.  We can suppose that the two could occur together during the big bang or even that photonic light could be the first state.  Why?
The reason that we can predict either as possible has more to do with clock time states than traditional dimensional understanding (photons can only exist in space traditionally).
CT1=space, one coordinate changing at a time, CT2 is photonic energy with two coordinates changing at once, neither at the speed of CT1.  There is no perspective for CT1 so no time change can be perceived, but we know form observation that space and time at least appear to exist together so that any coordinate change involves the passage of time, but in this case all the Clock time is associated with the change of time so that there is no perceived spatial component, hence space "appears" invisible, non-existent, even though it has the same basic coordinate foundation as everything else.  We would initially assume that when you knock ANY one coordinate out of alignment, that only that coordinate is changed.
That of course is "space-time" thinking.  In Non-linear space, there are no separate coordinates to change, its one singularity.  So to knock any quantum unit out of place you are knocking them all out of place.  This is one place where the non-linear environment differs from the idea of the universe as data on a hard drive.
So, one question we'll just have to come back to is how to you change the singularity to create linearity.  The other question is how can, by looking at any one "time" locked into the singularity, do you realign every frigging quantum point to show them all in perspective in an entire universe!
But first, let's talk about what happens when you change one quantum in the singularity where all quantum are changing at exactly the same way so they are without time and dimension.  The obvious answer is that at a quantum point, all of them are knocked out of alignment at once in exactly the same way, ergo (boom).
Now, let's talk light vs space.
Space is the fundamental frenquency, the lowest frenquency of a periodic waveform.
Space is the lowest frenquency sinusoidal in the sum.
Instead of using f0 we will use f1 because f0 might be thought of as non-linear time or the un-thrumbed universe.
So we'll use space as f1
photonic energy then is f2=2*f1
Wave energy (which is the first state that has its own harmonics) is f3=3*f1.
This suggests if we need to use traditional physics that you would go immediately to f3.  This is one concept that requires at least a limited amount of consideration.  It would provide for a lot of the background radiation we observe, but also requires that the universe be able to support that level of energy.  Also, unless at least some space is created, there is no environment for separation of the energy. It would be a super-dense (singular-point) wave which would be photonic light.  It could then break down to create space between portions of the wave to separate it.
The same analysis can be made for f2 (photonic light) with similar results except the existence of space allows the photons to align to form waves instead of waves breaking down to photons.  It is easier, to imagine this state because there is no possibility of waves in the single quantum state, but there could be a single photon so that state seems likely.
Why not space?  Space has most of the elements you'd need, so why not the scientific state instead of the religious one (or correctly put, why is a quantum of light as likely as a quantum of space).  The answer is subtle and misleading.  A single quantum of space containing all information changing at once in the same place without separation would have all the gravity in the universe and would have the exact same characteristics as the singularity.  Whooooooaaaahhhhh, lol.
So you can at least argue that when you strum the singularity, you're separating all this space in terms of location and that can be done as a single photon point location which has energy which forces the photons apart whereas if it were space, there would be no such coordinate separation necessary.  I.E. you can argue the old testament version has a role in physics.
Unfortunately, it is equally plausible to argue that space when all the particles are separated merely forms the photonic (and then wave forms) energy; but the argument that the "strumming" of the universe is actually the conversion of point space to point photons which explode in either direction (as space and waves) is not easy to ignore, just as beginning in a wave state without any space between the waves is plausible.
A period at the moment of spatial singularity to point space (or photon or wave) is created which in this case can be thought of in terms of time so that there is the minimum repeating unit of a signal: (where T is the period)
x(t)=x(t+T) for all t E R which will hold true for all features of the universe and which we will have to save for the next post.
I know you see where all this is going, how can you stand the suspense.  Seriously?