do not think i have lost it
this is your thing
i adopt it to protect you
my thing, well we will see
perhaps if we share more
time, secrets who knows
but it has to be your thing
and if i end up on the desert island
at the end of the day
do not think you will be forgiven
but for now
there is not time,
except that time we figured out
you who knew all along
and i who finally learned it
that i will share
but not what we have
what we had
till death
Let us look at another way of showing how perspective misdirected physics.
We are going to speak of faster speeds, but it is important to note that we all have approximately the same time because we have a common baseline, movement through space on the surface of a spinning sphere. The small speeds we add to that by driving or even jet flight are relatively small by comparison.
To understand this, ignoring the speed of the galaxy itself, we revolve around the center of the galaxy at 792,000 km/hr. The rotation of the earth is puny by comparison (1600 km/hr) and 107,000 km/hr around the sun is similarly less, but not inconsequential. Hence, time dilation has modest relative effects at everyday speeds and even the fastest man made object at 724,000 km/hr (other than particles accelerated) is less than this baseline speed reducing the effects.
Certainly time changes as AuT has deetermined it, even among different molecules.
This is a common feature of other aspects of AuT, such as compression. We see scale results but not exact results because intermediary states and incomplete transitions and clouds of other states and mixed transition (eg mass into wave energy, photons and space) means that the exact nature of the interactions hides the precision, but the scales can be seen.
Let's look at the compression example of black holes:
The alternative scale is actually suggested by black holes where certain aspects of time go non-linear. Black holes may also be seen as the next progression in “compression”. Planck mass m(p)=(hc/g)^1/2 is 2.18x10-8kg. approximately 3 solar masses are the size of black hole star collapse. A solar mass is 2x10^30 kg; so 6x10^30kg is the approximate size of a black hole star.
Understanding that a neutron is 1.67x10^-24kg. It is possible to get from this that the maximum size of a black hole might be of a factor (6*1.67)^(30+24) which is higher than predicted, a scale of 54 compared to the predicted magnitude of 38. That neutron stars have a mass of a scale of approx. 10^27 indicates that a middle ground between the measured black hole and the predicted Chandrasekhar limit for a neutron star is very close to the predicted sweet spot for an AuT Black Hole. Note that the black hole and the neutron star are essentially the same, at least in terms of scale.
The question becomes whether the additional mass for a black hole is a function of other compression features (e.g. the rest of a galaxy) surrounding the black hole, a change in the equation or a function of the minimum quantum of matter involved in the compression cycle.
A proton cycling in a collider moves near the speed of light. It essentially has no time, its electron cloud has been stripped off and its sharing only the occasional electron...and yet we can time it at any point. Moreover we can say where it happens to be in the collider at say 5:00 pm.
It has no time, and yet we use our time to calculate its speed (velocity per time period), its location and whether it can have a beer or not. Well, its too small to have a beer, but the rest of it applies.
Indeed the uncertainty principle for M. Proton is reduced as it approaches the speed of light because we are reducing the dimensions.
This same perspective thing is why we can look at non-dimensional space and one dimensional photons and two dimensional waves and see them as having 3 dimensions. We are applying our perspective, our clock time even though they do not have it.
This analysis indicates several things. One, that time is just an effect we use to measure things from our perspective and therefore irrelevant to the underlying symmetry of the universe.
It also tells us that all these things that do not look like matter to us are just what AuT has said all along, the same stuff as us with fewer dimensions.
Our fast proton friend is loosing its dimension by elongating. This doesn't mean dimension and time are the same, it loses time because information isn't being exchanged by electrons, it losses dimension because the 3rd dimension is breaking down to allow more spatial exchange.
Together, this shows why change is such a poor measurement or definition of standard clock time, because by our standards the proton near the speed of light is changing really fast, but (1) no electron cloud exchange to speak of so it has no history or time as we define (pre-aut) it and (2) Mr. P really isn't changing any faster than any other point at a quantum level, there is only a relative slowing of net results.
Indeed the only real randomness introduced into this is the 27 in the 256:27 ratio that kicks things off and maybe this pre-dimensional ratio is what is necessary in order to have sufficient change in the pre-dimensional state to the first dimensional state to make the universe work in the way we experience it (.e.g there are 256:26, 25, 2, 1 ratios out there with different geometries which just don't work to make us what we are).
One last look at how perspective works is to discuss what this proton cycling in collider moving near the speed of light experiences. It essentially has no time, its electron cloud has been stripped, sharing only the occasional electron bundle which, to keep up must have its own larger and larger cloud of other states so that all the particles involved are in a great state of breakdown, hence the greater speed observed even though on a quantum level everything is changing one change at a time.
The speed actually reduces the uncertainty. Why? Because the dimensions r being reduced. Mr. P has no time, yet we use our time to calculate its speed (velocity per our time), its location. This same perspective thing is why we can look at non-dimensional space and one dimensional photons and two dimensional waves and see them as having 3 dimensions. We are applying our perspective, our hist. clock even though they do not have it.
wave particle duality obvious (exchanges without time), the big bang (net + vs - results), ditto quantum gravity, etc.
The example can be seen by taking the first 4 points in "space"-3,5,-7,9,etc. The -3 lasts for 3 counts, the 5 for 5, etc. you have -/+/-/+;ditto,ditto,+,+,-,+;ditto;+/-/-/+. Its slightly more complicated because they are sequentially generated. high values of x you get 256:27 (pi-1:1) compression then 1:1.68x10^6, (pi1:pi2,etc if aligned, otherwise not.
In the real world, it looks like this:
-;-/+,-/+/-;+/+/-/+;and ignoring the next point which would otherwise be added +/+/-/+
The net result is that pre-AuT physics is spending billions of dollars on colliders to look at shadows and isn't looking for the right results, at least according to AuT.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yq4uCWtQE24
P.S. there is no pride in this, the smartest robot in the room is not entitled to pride, its still just a robot.
No comments:
Post a Comment