Pages

Saturday, March 24, 2018

AuT and the standard model 2 of 2

As long as SM is using the collision of accelerated particles as its standard it is going to continue to be a waste of time in a true quantum universe since at quantum instances acceleration is irrelevant.  Velocity in quantum moments is just ct1,2 and free ct3 exchange vs ct3 change along information arms.  It is only a ratio.  It has nothing to do with the beginning of the universe, it is the confusion of time, our recognition of change, with true change which is quantum and at the level of super-symmetry.  What SM calls super symmetry is the comparison of different time/3d states.  Super symmetry in AuT is the underlying math that gives rise to illusory features that allow us to have cognizance.


SM shies away from gravity which is not warranted in a model without paradox. AuT shows gravity as part of the underlying supersymmetry based on the compression or decompression ct1 solutions making up ct2.

AuT is specific in its predictions. The SM is much more vague.
This chart shows how AuT generates positive or negative state photons from fpluspix solutions.

The idea that the SM model is predictive is unclear.
Does SM explain the origin of Newtonian physics?  Under AuT all forces are effects so that they become predictive where most of the changes are stable in the narrow framework of space where we exist between very fast changes and very slow ones. 
Does SM explain Wave particle duality?  It doesn't, although AuT easily explains as a pre-time state transition between ct2 and ct3 states.
SM predicts some of what is seen in a collider experiment, but if it is predictive of the collider results what about the unobserved phenomena predicted?  How does the theory deal with the imperfection of angular measurements?  AuT deals with this which can be taken care of by quantizing space.
 How does the SM theory deal with co-existence of 1,2 and 3 dimensional phenomena?  AuT deals with the co-existence of these phenomena by showing they exist and our 3d perspective leads us to think they have dimensions that are absent (e.g. in space).
What is the underlying basis for the AuT theory, e.g why does the universe build dimensions?  How does the theory explain space?  AuT explains this using the same mathematics that we observe.  In AuT space is explained as a pre-dimensional building block for the dimensions as ct2-5.
How does the SM theory deal with time dilation other than just recognizing it?  AuT shows that our view of time is the problem with time dilation.  Time dilation is the result of what time really is, ct1,2 and free ct3 states vrs ct3 states aligned as ct4 carrier arms.



No comments:

Post a Comment