The emperor physicist is not wearing clothes here
I wrote this:
"I am expecting to be brought around, because I think I misunderstand quite a bit of this lecture and despite great notes feel that I'm not up to the underlying theory or math; but as I follow this, we have "particles going back and forth in time, particles appearing spontaneously, assuming that both time and Planck length are applicable to every transition. These strike me as unstable foundations for theory, although I'll readily admit that math has been summoned up to support them."
That isn't entirely true, because I don't for a second think I'll be brought around. I was brainwashed with this nonsense earlier in life, I figured out what super symmetry was, I won't be quiet on my blog. To be fair, however, I am certainly wrong at least statistically since I'd turn all this on its ear, but the current physics sound more like witchcraft than physics and while I would be the first to admit that g-space is a bizarre conceptual place, the rest of my physics, AuT, is math in its most pure and logical form and its built on accepted and not hypothetical mathematical models.
QED talks about annihilation (A), and regeneration (R) and identity of electrons before A and after R which would destroy history and the conception of time were it true.
You cannot have a single photon create multiple electrons, not even a positron and electron pair because there is not enough information present to do this in AuT. If this is done experimentally and the experiment is not flawed, then there is a feature of AuT that I do not understand or there is some more fundamental problem with the theory (which there is not). However, test can be done in theory although in space there is spontaneous (i.e. time independent) transformation between photons and waves and electrons, at least presumptively are only a very highly compressed form of wave.
If you have a photon with all of its ct1 baggage present with an electron, the amount of ct1 exchange as it varies between the two, the AuT interaction, is significant in terms of scale even though it doesn't mean much compared to the scales of ct4 for individual units. Presumably, most physics deals with bundles sufficient to say we're looking a fields.
There is talk of probability being the momentum^2 of the scattering tunnel diagram and annihilation, regeneration diagram if those are the two things that can happen, but there is more...
Feyman equations allow for other interactions.
In the middle of the A-R tunnel, the photon can..do a midway annihilation. One has to remember that these are time based views to allow for positrons, but they do not separate as requrired, true time (dimensional change in one direction) from the make believe time of QED.
This same buble with the same AuT problems of time vs dimension can occur in the transformation diagram.
Interestingly and for very different reasons AuT and QED both provide for the generation of photons and ultimately waves up to electrons from space, but with very different processes and with different forms of conservation.
AuT: Space-compression-photon-compression-wave-partial copression-electron based on mathematical underlying solutions being organized and remaining organized despite substitutions in a time independent, x dependent environment.
QEC: Balanced creation and destruction of charged particles moving two ways in time.
Let's talk about the credibility factor for a moment:
1) Time
AuT defines time as a dimension based phenomena result as opposed to a dimension and points out that it only exists in a narrow range bordered by Velocity and Gravity rendering tests dependent on time irrelevant.
QED looks at time as an absolute dimension and allows movement by electrons in this dimension even though it looks at electrons as particulate (in part) and higher end particles cannot move in multiple directions in time.
2) Dimension
AuT views dimensions as sequential compression states (exponentially separated by a specific formula and process) providing explanations for how we experience force and mass characteristics as well as space itself.
QED accepts all dimensions as existing together, allowing without explanation how electrons can suddenly materialize in space.
3) AuT explains the universe as arising mathematically from an information based system building according to a single variable explaining the interconnection of points with gravity.
QED uses the big bang with all the baggage that goes with it.
4)AuT has Non-spontaneous creation and reasons why lower states evolve into higher compression states
QED has spontaneous creation and wrongly equates bosons to electrons as if a single boson could even begin to give rise to an electron much less the other way around.
This is the last of these posts and I'll revisit it slightly in probability.
No comments:
Post a Comment