AuT and the battle with the periodic table 1 of 2*

Well, I am preparing for my first very short and private biathalon for the holiday.  It involves a surprising amount of technology and probably not much velocity and no accelration to speak of.
I am getting closer to my article, but the 28th looks like an unreachable challenge.  We'll see.

For today, there is a discussion which has yet to make it to the blog.  You can call it a christmas gift.


Perhaps the greatest single triumph in chemistry is the periodic table of the elements.
Atomic design has largely been forced into agreement with the table but not without cause.
As a chemist I am particularly well suited to discussing the periodic table (I am a driving force behind the periodic table of the elements coloring book although my name is absent from the credits-I do get paid when you order a copy so please do by all means).
However, being well placed to have this discussion does not necessarily mean that I can make a convincing case to align these two models.  There are  some interesting overlap, however; enough to support AuT.
It is worth noting at the outset that a lot is going on at the level of the periodic table.  It is also worth noting that this observable AuT transition is a model of sorts for the lower transitions and therefore important.
So lets start with what we know is going on in the background according to AuT.
We have a transition from10^16 to 16^32 neutron to black hole compression.
We have 32 information arms being loaded at the rate 16, 32,64, 128, 256, 512, up to 16^32 and each of those when full due to compression folds into a black hole.  The actual build is a bit more extreme: 16, 256; 4096...etc up to 16^32.
Until then, you not only have atomic structures and their associated compression, but you also have molecular structures.
You have the strong and the weak force, but more particularly in AuT you have the very weak force, the strong force, the weak force and the very strong force which you may have to refer to the published volumes to understand that since much of that post dates this writing.

Either of those books cover it, the longer book (vol 1) does so in more detail.

If you are too broke to support me financially by purchasing a book you can look at it this was; the very weak force is ct4 arm loading up to collapse where you get the strong force, the weak force is ct5 arm loading up to collapse where you get the very strong force.  They are graient type forces and presumably there are more gradients for ct5 arm loading and that is important to this discussion.

Hydrogen marks an unusual place where ct4 compression has been interrupted or brokendown leaving a partially formed, but charged electron/proton pair. When two of these get together you get a helium which is a balanced state, although it has two sets of net charge.  Helium is the first ct5 transitional state.

One might expect given the complexity at this level that the 16 might operate in groups like the other compression states; 4, 8, 12, 16 for example.  Again I refer you to the books for solutions, but the electron is a t12 state (part of a t13 state) from the 4, 8, 12,16 series.  The electron bundle of t12 states left over from the t13 state gives charge to the electron and proton in one model.

We see something a little different in the periodic table, it is more of a 1,2,8,8,18, a few more 18s then some 15s.  But we also see partially stabilized informataion arms with neutrons added.

So lets look at this huge mess and try to make some sense out of it.
First the Atomic weight (mass) number has more to do with filling inforrmation arms than the Atomic Number; but the atomic number tracks the net charge which is more important for reachtions superficially.

In terms of the 4,8,12,16 filling, we see He matches an atomic mass of 4 (all of these are approximate for reasons discussed in those  books).  The 16 is filled by Oxygen which, interestingly, has a AN of 8, a bridge of sorts between charged and non-charged particles like Helium (O can be 8/16; He 2/4).

One can look at the second ct5 arm (256) the same way;  16, 32, 64, 128, 256.
So S is 16/32; Ge is 32/72 (a worse fit; cf  Cu 28/64ish); and then things get really out of what, not with AuT but with the periodic table and you have the Lanthanide Gd 64/127 which is closer for AuT, but out of what with the table, then you have left the chart and the arm loading transitions completely to molecular type structures and beyond.

The point of the exercise is that you can match the type of compression expected from AuT with bridges between pure neutron stacking and combined neutron, proton stacking fairly well with one exception; Ge where the 40 neutrons would "look better" if it were 8 less.  That being said, 8 is sort of a magic number (from the 4,8,12,16 set) so this type of anomally can be forgiven; particularly since it is largely made up for later.

It is worth noting that the periodic table ends (see below for questions relative to this) at Lr which is a 103/262 state which is in excess of the 256 for the first two arms of ct5 (two of 32).  There is, of course plenty of room for additional elements and boththe Lanthanides and Actimides are unstable atomic forms and can be thought of as transitional anomallies.

The electron shell issue is dealt with in the books, but those function dimensionally in a way very similar in AuT to that using traditional atomic structure with exceptions because the change in shape is due to a change in pi due to increased compression and the diffusion of the matrix is not tied to fields but to the more complex solution; again reference is made to the books.

Newsweek: New Form of Matter, Excitonium, Finally Proved to Exist. http://google.com/newsstand/s/CBIwgOinjTc

Phys.org: Energy quantization enhances the performance of single-atom heat machines. https://phys.org/news/2018-05-energy-quantization-single-atom-machines.html Shared via Google News