On the road to a more perfect atom

This is a part of my theory claimed by someone else after I was published.
Futurism: New Theory: The Universe is a Bubble, Inflated by Dark Energy. https://futurism.com/the-byte/new-theory-universe-bubble-inflated-dark-energy
I onlymention this because it is frustrating to have figured out what is not known by these other theories and then to see someone piece mealing it out, trying to punch together something without realizing all of the parts.

It does suggest I need to finish those articles, although they add very little to the specifics of the model.

The problem is that AuT is a precise mathematical model.

Filing the next patent will largely be cutting out huge parts of the prior patent so that the newer parts can be filed under a page limit which is artificially set but economically intelligent; something I should have done with the last filing but did not.

Indeed, it might make sense to just file a totally new patent with just the newest information leaving the old one for what it was which would be a pretty logical method now that I think about it.  I spent many days correcting the first parts of that, much of that work would be lost, but it is, I think, the easy way out.

First, however, I have to finish the atomic and closely related molecular design.  This is done up to a point, but it fails.

Part of this can be wrtitten into the complexity of the calculations.  Unfortunately, this is not a complete answer which requires a certain preceision tied to the overall symetry of atomic observation.

The proton part can be tied largely to quantum symetries, the need to have fractal specificiity.  Indeed, the molecular side of things is mostly tied to this feature mathematically even by pre-aut physics although it is done in terms of orbitals and not fractals.  A fairly good argument can be made that they are the same things.

The neutron "design" is a lot more difficult.  The basic neutron-proton interface is pretty simple once you understand that is represented which also tells specifically how the strong force is manifest over time and is, like all AuT things, obvious once you see it.  You will certainly see it if all goes well by the 15th of January, both obvious and something of an explanatory let down if you are looking for magic.

The neutron design appears fairly easy to conceptualize for Helium, then, following the linear model suggested, it seems to have a fair pattern, not as mathematically easy to discern as fractals.  Indeed the fractals are misleading as a design feature, because those only provide the more stable strurctures, like the molecular and radioactive otherwise present results are the proof of the imperfection of the AuT model which cannot fully balance.

Balance is where it all becomes clear in its lack of clarity.  I know it is confusing because it is partially riddles at this point in time, it will be clear soon enough, when I feel more comfortable and you will be a little disappointed because in retrospect, looking in the rear view mirror as it were, AuT is obvious.  
This model perfectly defines the electron and proton in terms of function and charge and even balance which is enough.  It provides a basis for the periodic table in terms of design without orbital features and it explains why neutrons are necessary to atomic strucutre, why they appear as features of the so called strong force, why the strong force is not at all what is suggested by pre-AuT physics, why atoms stay together and if it leaves some questions as to molecular and atomic design, it defines why the periodic table appears as it does and why things stay together in the forms presented.

I have pages of conceptual artwork which only lack time to be put into drawings and into a specification and which will be necessary for the next stage of the process, the two articles and the presentation the first week of February.

On the acceleartor front will come next.