Pages

Sunday, April 28, 2019

BDTH 11-electromag 2

The attraction between two people who are matched charges are the same in their own way as the other charges, or perhaps they are a reflection of some type of that.  It is something I would like to write about, perhaps I should say maybe dishonesty is part of the antimatter element.   I get that.
How does one look at electromagnetism is the quantum sense.  This is discussed in the footnotes already posted, but there are some other elements worth considering.
Take for example a macro example.  An overly friendly dog in a room filled with people.  The dog will with apparent randomness bounce between all of the people, spending a little more or less time with each depending on the reaction it gets.  What are the pre-time type elements at play?  First there is the way the dog thinks about the people, then there is the way that each person reacts to the dog, does the person pet the dog, shy away, hit the dog?  You look at this and say, ok, these are all overt acts, but you know deep inside that it has a lot to do with the makeup of the people.  Are they alergic, do they like the dog; does the dog smell something or exect  something?  There is a knock on the door, a killer enters the room.  How does the dog react?
The dog is a manefestation of the electrons that make it up, but also  the myriad lower ct states and transition states all operating together.  The dog has fewer psychological inputs than the electron has quantum effects, but both are pushed by features which are relatively consistent while appearing on close examination as not consistent at all.  The electrons are usually moving with the flow of the universe, at least where we are, at 790,000 mph due to net unwinding.
I have some drawings for the electromag discussion and the antimatter portion that ties these to the absorption and spew experienced between electrons and protons and I am going to tell a bit about those as I handle the discussion
ct3--t6--t12--t16(-t13)
prep-pho-elec-prot
5 wings coming off a t16, each a 12 with a netting of 6-3 between them reflecting the absorption towards the 16 another 16 across from the first and below them two absorbing n's then the staircase of f series anchored on one end with ct3 and on the other with a neutron and the quantum packets these represent going in both places; then the equations explaining each of these theoretical stesp:
1:10^6 (6); 10^6:10^12 (6); 10^12:10^16 (4).
Where the t12 wings connect to the t16 there is a web of t6 and t3 which also clouds up around and between the t12 states.
There is a flow of ct1 which is invisbile between the lower t states, take t12 for example, and the t16.  But what is invisible?  Things turn out to have varying degrees of invisibility just as they have varying degrees of time and in a very related sense.
The t1-5 are invisible, the ct3 certainly is, the ct2 and 1.
The invisibilty is part of the reason we mistake the processes.  It comes down to time and visibiilty, we attribute randomness to what is invisible and magic to what is pre-time.  Well, we did anyway.
There are two more pages of notes on electromagnetism; but there is one more post...

FOOTNOTE 6 Time

            Time like the other forces arises as a result and not a cause of the changing dimensional results of basic math equations regionally and for the universe.  It arises gradually and the number of changes in x for each second using a Planck scale analysis, appropriate for the ct3-4 transition state where time arises in bulk, indicates there are 10^44 changes in x each second.  Any single change will be long in coming in the middle of the universe, but adjoining spots in space change a mere 2 change in x apart from one another giving rise to both the durability and continuity that we experience.
This slide makes it appear like ct1f moves fairly quickly to ct1h.  In truth, the number of changes of x in even this short movement would be over an excruciatingly long number of changes in x. Time results from the quantum snapshots of dimension just as a movie arises from quantum slides in a series.

No comments:

Post a Comment