Pages

Tuesday, October 27, 2015

NLC-F-series: Why galaxies after the big bang

If I am going to finish my book, I plan not to write as regularly.  This diversion into spiral theory has expanded the book beyond 450 pages.  If you're complaining because I write too much, if you don't want to hear what's going on, then perhaps you get your wish.  If you're bored, there are a few hundred older posts that go in many directions.   directly or not you send me brochures for travel all over the world, you don't think that I see that.  I get update letters, and that doesn't include things on the news where I search for pictures that will have one familiar face.
While I've spent entirely too much time already on F-series, occasionally, I continue to come up with "fun" reasons to talk about it further. It just works as a model.
Some of these ideas, they don't really arise to theories because the math isn't developed, have taken on something of a life of their own as I address various potentialities and force these flights of fantasy into the framework of what is seen.
*The second is that each successive clock time type results from slower, more coordinated collective changes to coordinates of a prior clock time.  For example, x, y and z coordinates changing at the speed of light “gradually slow” and as they drop below light speed changes to a state where each individual change is slower than that previous for the faster change.
To accomplish this, as described later, informational changes are not relative to the primary line of change but instead changes with an information change that is changing.  In order to better envision this a system of spirals off of spirals is used where one spiral is the primary, another is secondary and the third runs off the secondary which is changing with the primary.*
After the big bang, my big bang which is the fourth or fifth intersection of colliding linear spirals, there were large enough black holes to allow for the accumulation of galaxies.
All of this new understanding is causing a major rewrite and as a special treat, given the fact that I may spend greater and greater periods of time away (the real treat) I give you one of the re-written chapters.  If you type in "transitional changes" in the search bar you can see the original version of this chpater from which spiral posts originated.

FEATURES OF TRANSITIONAL CHANGES AND

INTRODUCTION TO SPIRAL TRANSITION THEORY

There are two aspects of NLC that represent the transition.
The first is the conservation of clock time.  If two coordinates are changing, they will change at the same rate as a single clock time change.
The second is that each successive clock time type results from slower, more coordinated collective changes to coordinates of a prior clock time.  For example, x, y and z coordinates changing at the speed of light “gradually slow” and as they drop below light speed changes to a state where each individual change is slower than that previous for the faster change.
To accomplish this, as described later, informational changes are not relative to the primary line of change but instead changes with an information change that is changing.  In order to better envision this a system of spirals off of spirals is used where one spiral is the primary, another is secondary and the third runs off the secondary which is changing with the primary.
Information can, using spirals, remain the same.  Otherwise, if  Clock times do not change their orientation, then there are different clock times.  CT1 and CT2 are therefore identical except in their orientation to one another, or they are altered in some fashion.  In NLC, it is indicated that they only change in orientation.
If they are different, either one ends when another begins, one changes when the other begins (e.g. into a force type coordinate type), or one continues but is drowned out in terms of perception relative to the “higher” clock time.  It is believed that all of the information in the universe remains in place, but steadily changes in orientation depending on what quantum moment is being examined.  In this way, “traveling” back or “forward” in time is illusory which fits well into the theory.  It is also consistent with the idea of a minimum quantum of time where things are not changing at all.  What we call standard clock time is an illusion that is explained later graphically.
Since it is uncertain how CT4 interactions with  CT3, CT2 and CT1 it is important to come up with some sort of transitional model that takes into account observed phenomena, coordinate changes that have slowed dramatically which can be refined.
The theory chosen, Intersecting Spiral Theory, can be used to begin to examine the relationship of different clock times, for example, to determine if CT1 has CT2, CT3 and CT4 changes are active or dormant in terms of linearity.  It gives predictions of how linearity can be constant but still allow each quantum event to change at a constant rate even though relative rates of change vary.
The answer may be suggested by higher Clock Time states (C4 and CT5).
The empty spaces within other forms of matter are CT1 time coordinates under the theory, so it stands to reason that there would also be CT2 and CT3 time states as well as space (CT1) within CT4 states.  The best way to picture this is by looking at CT5 states.  This assumes that black holes are CT5 states.  To something living within a CT5 state, the Universe would be a collection of several fundamental “CT5 particles” which are black holes.  It is clear that CT4, CT3, CT2 and CT1 states would abound around the CT5 states in such an examination and the same should be true from our perspective as CT4 inhabitants.
For CT4 inhabitants, we observe the presence of CT1 states, but there are also likely CT2 and CT3 states, so called energy states, present.
The change in position of different forms of clock time (CT) indicate that coordinate changes continue regardless.  This means that in some way, there are coordinate changes for each clock time and theory has to allow them to change at different apparent rates while the actual rate remains the same for each.
The alternative would be to allow different rates of change for each clock time which would take us down a different path.
Another feature of the model chosen is to allow clock time changes of different points (P1, P2, etc) to occur more consistently with other points (P1a, P2a, etc)  at higher clock time states allowing for greater concentration.  
The model should stay consistent with a single quantum element creating everything, as the changes get more complex and slow down they happen closer together and you get compression.  
From this we can infer that CT5 changes are incredibly slow within Black Holes since they vary exponentially relative to the speed of light.  
The effect for CT4 sub-light speed changes is standard clock time, which spiral theory shows as movement along a spiral that runs separately from, but connected to, the primary spiral. 
Extraordinary change, equivalent to CT4 and Standard clock time, can be forecast when matter changes to black holes.  CT4 (matter) would appear to change very fast from a CT5 perspective which might make it look more like energy looks to us.  That is, energy features are actually just the same changes we experience happening much faster.  Overlapping spirals provide a mechanism which allows us to envision how this is perceived from static points along a spiral of CT4 while not visible from CT3.  The model also indicates that a different time scale would be present along the 5th intersection where 5 coordinates are changing together instead of just 4.  This time need not be any different than the time we experience, it would just be exponentially slower.
Other coordinate change features are experienced by consecutive forms of concentration which visibly end for us at black holes (ct5).
One feature is they become the center of dimensional rotation due, apparently, to the common line through the spirals which gives rise to time.  For both matter and black holes this provides a rotational aspect.  It will be discussed later how at the 5th intersection of the intersecting spirals, sufficient density becomes available for black holes to form which allows them to serve as a core or center around which other clock time states can exist to allow the formation of galaxies with the rest of space spinning around them.
While there appears to be a collapse of space time at black holes, that is unlikely.  In fact NLT is a reaction to this.  If there were the complete collapse suggested in EHT, then black holes would drop out of space and would all go to some non-linear place.  Instead, what we appear to be seeing is coordinate change that is so slow that it appears to not exist.  Given informational rate change consistency, we can expect the net change in a black hole to be the same as the ultra-fast (so fast it appears invisible to us) changes of ct1 (space).
This is a model, so it remains possible that Black holes are something different.  In EHT, for example, support existed for a finding that they represent nothing more than a reversal of all of the coordinate changes leading to Standard clock time.  While this pre-NLC concept, now looks absurd in the extreme, only continued analysis will answer. 
If the change in coordinates is such that in black holes there is the loss of CT1-CT4  there should be, as a part of CT5, a type of non-movement associated with black holes that appear dimensionless.  Black holes have no movement in the other dimensions, even Standard Clock Time appears to go to zero.  So what is CT5 that must come into play?  What do black holes experience that is one step greater in effect than Standard Clock Time?  Is there a “super standard clock time” which is available to us which would hold powers on a scale equivalent to the power that standard clock time gives, the power of thought?

      For example, philosophers argue you cannot keep two thoughts in your head at one time.  Maybe you can with CT5.  However, the more likely suggestion of spiral coordinate analysis is that things happen in a very similar way, just with more compression, more coordination and relatively slower apparent time, even though net change is the same as is observed.

No comments:

Post a Comment