AuT Vectors (4?) and god as memory in the universe

            For the first equation (ct0) you basically have 0’ which hovers between two states, -1 and +1.  These are the same as yes/no for reasons that will be explained in greater detail but if I say I am not not going, then I am going.  If I say, yes, I am going; effectively two yes answers then yes, I am still saying yet.  This totally bizarre logic is mathematically sound only in our universe, but our universe is the one where we lay out the math:

           This solution -1,0,1- gives the wrong answer.  The wrong answer is that you add the 1,1 and the -1-1 and you get the answer.  This doesn’t work because if you solve for this equation (0,1,1) you get the right answer with F(n)^2^n but if you solve for -1,0,1, even if you square the two sides separately (-1)^2^0*(1)^2^0 is still only 1 only 1 and the universe doesn’t expand.  So what do we do Mr Genius?

          The answer is that we unbalance the equation and use infomation arms,

Chapter 7 the unbalanced information arm

            The answer is that we take two positives or two negatives before we perform the expansion along the two arms for 0,1,1.  That is we have -1,0,1,1 or we have -1,-1,0,1.  Why?

(2)^2^0 for the first arm times (-1)^2^0 for the second arm yields 2.  What this means is that the unbalance of the universe which we see as infinite series, expanding(f(n) and 2^n) and contracting (pi) (1/1-x) begin from this process of imbalance which is necessary to the 2^n results.

If you have an offsetting negative state, you still get the same answer once you get past non-dimensional space.

-1,-1=-2 and -2^2^0=-2.  -2*1^2^0=-2.

However….

            When you get to the next arm you are doing the second 2^2^1= arm.

            The first arm is -2 or 2 generated in the fashion shown, and then this arm is squared.  -2^2 or 2^2 yields a positive result which carries forward.

            This suggestions that ct1 solutions F(n)(2^0) are the first arm of the F(n)(2^1) drawing.  This looks accurate because at ct2 (photon) appears to use one changing ct1 states (space) where one comes in and another goes out before turning the arm and this is where your 1:256 solution to light speed comes from.

            These are all steps in a process.

          We wrongly ask two questions.  what about time and why do we show vectors in three directions for each change in x.

the idea that there are 3 dimension is as such is a pre-aut concept.  in a dimensionless environment there are not three dimensions that are in different directions, but there are 3 states that change together relative to a carrier arm (in ct4 at least) and each of the "state/places" give the appearance of position and for any difference in x a vector from one solution to the next and when these are compared they appear to separate into 3 dimensional space, it being  understood that for any one of these points even in pre-aut math, it certainly is changing wildly (due to the different rotations of bodies of space.  They all have to change with x in some fashion.

          The suggestion of scalars and vectors is that the relationship between these different places is the cost of theta for the parts of one relative to the other in g-space so that in o-space this cosine relationship is how they are separated into component parts that give rise to dimension.  The angle is always a right angle from one to the other, an inflection point, or some other total transition that when averaged gives rises to the types of spirals that we observe in AuT.

          This is the relationship in this methodology between one state and the next higher information arm set.

          While we see dimension from these non-dimensional solutions arising from this relatively simple building of states or places; and while we see building compression, we don't see an increase from all spots nor does the equation easily provide for that.  That is we don’t see space exploding from solid objects.

          The building equation, 0,0,1 and 0,0,-1 that leads to 1,-1,1 and -1,1,-1 suggests that growth only can happen from zero, the original point of zero grows the amount of information from a place that can only be called the center of the universe, growing with each value of x, in all other place the information only builds according the f-series, compression being built into the equation to give the net positive values (after they are squared) which allows for a universe of the type observed but with internally preserved negative feature since each state maintains (or memorizes) the information of the prior states from which it is built.

            God in this universe lies in the not insubstantial ability to “remember” all of the states as they combine to make the long information arms.  If we accept this building process, then it is likely that as x changes, every point changes, but the only point that can create new information is 0’, the state that gives meaning to -1^x.  While the approximate mechanism is -1-11 and 11-1, the exact mechanism in response to the change in the single variable should allow for the other solutions that are built into the equation.