Why? Because the idea of an information based universe, "we are in a computer program" and other pre-AuT nonsense was already out there. Theories are like opinions. Anyone can come up with a theory and everyone has many of them.
What makes AuT important is that it has a model which is supportable and predictable for the universe.
Models, however, are different. They take time to build. If you put them together correctly, they are elegant and beautiful, or sometimes scary, but usually reflect the intention of intelligent design. That is why AuT is so much more than anything else, because it shows more of the intelligent design.
Without effort, it answers questions raised by prior orbservations, it eliminates falacies. There are many clever ways of describing theories and testing them, but the one test that you arrive back at every time, is whether the theory is durable in the face of observed results. AuT is unsurpassed in that regard.
First, it goes all the way back to g-space. Of course, any theory that does not fully describe g-space is inadequate and AuT is inadequate. But most accepted theories start at the big bang and have, at best, rough ideas of what preceded the most recent big bang. In that regard, AuT blows right through the big bang, space time itself.
It has long been understood that matter and energy are exchangable, but there is no prior model that shows energy to be interchangeable with space or to describe space with such particularity that its role in expansion and contraction, in positive and negative, in matter and antimater, gravity and dark energy are answered with total clarity, even to the point of explaining why the two exist and on what mathematical structure they rely.
Force, one of the holdouts of prior theories, what drives the reactions and the universe itself is eliminated in favor of a system which is unified, both delivering and rendering irrelevant the idea of a unified field theory. That UFT is replaced with a symmetry that is so basic that even entropy is eliminated from the system of thermodynamics. Indeed, thermodynamics is eliminated except as an effect, not a cause.
One of the recent features to come into play is the one that involves inflection points generated not by intersecting spirals, but by shifts between positive and negative underlying carrier states represented as ct1 carriers with lifespans built around the underlying building blocks to pi.
In a soon to be published (or perhaps never to be published) book 4, I will show how part of the cycle between expansion and contraction can be tied to logarithmic and anti-logarithmic cycles. This allows the equation which has f(n) in the exponential to have that part drawn out into the form in which we experience it. It is not a state secret. For those of you who are impatient, you can look at the math already laid out in the prior posts which, comparing different ct states, in effect, give an equation log(b)x/y at the transition from ct1 to ct2; at the dimensional interface. Knowing that it is a trivial matter to apply my equations. The basic math has already been shown in prior posts, but the specifics are now complete something to look forward to.
What is nice about that is that the plot of logx/y appears as ripping non-dimensional space apart to create dimension, just as one would expect. There is a great graphic that appears in google when you do that.
While there is a slight hesitation when looking at x and y as both being built from information (albeit in different stages of compression (see also the question of transition sates allowing for greater complexity)) x and y have always represented numbers and hence are always the same thing in concept. As mentioned in the parenthetical, transition states (mesons seem to reflect these) mean that a great deal of depth is possible in the comparison of even early ct states, although stable forms appear to predominate, at least in mass clusters where we live.
I'll provide a link to that graphic, and the specific math when I get around to the primary post, this is just sort of a morning rambling.
The point is that AuT now has finished with the modeling part, that was complete when the one missing element was disclosed. This was not a work of genius since the missing element appears in book 1, but its application had to be worked out. That also was not a work of genius since the ratio of ct1 sin to ct0 sin was merely a matter of applying basic AuT concepts to existing mathematics, but the result being so supportive of the overall model was gratifying and, if AuT allowed for genius, which it doesn't, the basic model originating in 2012 in EHT and presented with the new vibrational model in 2017 would be a work of genius. Not patting myself on the back, just pointing out the obvious..
Many of you do not share this work, others do. It is obvious to you, if you think about it, that the reason you do not praise my work is because you are jealous, you need not be. Whatever transient genius I have is illusory as are your reasons for jealousy. You should be screaming about this work, because if you could have Einstein come and give a lecture on relativity you would not hesitate to do it; and yet you have the opportunity to something so much bigger than that and you are letting it slide through your fingers like sands through an hourglass. Should I say it? Sure, why not. "Such are the days of our lives."
No comments:
Post a Comment