a better (aut) understanding of force * anyway

I have now finished the first part of the major rewrite of the compendium, a "maybe" 5% accomplishment leaving 95% of the work to be done. Even adding information, there is a gradual decline in length, 40 pages gone so far even at the very beginning of this process.
Part one was sorting the information into broad categories electronically.  I have begun the very long process of deleting the information within these sorts, but what an undertaking!  At the end, the universe will be redefined in a single draft (noting that the second volume is not even under review yet.
Of course, this is not the end.  There are 278 draft posts (including this one) and it grows constantly.
For all the bs I have to put up with, the pompous reaction of the greater part of the physics community by way of example, there are certain ways that I am gratified, primarily as I write this without a shirt because I cannot afford air conditioning, it is knowing through logic rather than belief that AuT is right.
A better definition of time vs change is one major feature.
To understand how force, change and time interact one need only "understand" AuT.  We see gravity as a fixed thing from our time based perspective  because gravity occurs based on change (ct1 to ct2 level compression).  We "look" at the ratio of  mass to  velocity (which includes time) and say (well everyone before me anyway) ahhh look, gravity is a force over time.  What AuT shows is that gravity is the net effect of multiple changes that occur free of time, before the passage of a second, and then when you look at these over the life of a second instead of seeing the quantum changes you say (well before me anyway) look a force over time.  Insanity.
This applies to the electromagnetic force in much the same way.  The only difference is that ct3 is a part of the time ct3-4-5 interface so it  more directly affects time.
Something different happens the the strong and weak forces which are within the time orbit phenomena which makes us think of them in terms of manipulatable matter, something we can put our hands on and manipulate instead of the more intangible forces (well, except for me anyway) because we can bend, powder or compress them physically and it is all within a time framework.
This shows how the time vs non time perspective confuses physics (well, before AuT anyway)
One of the victims of Aut is relativity

Phys.org: How Einstein's equivalence principle extends to the quantum world. https://phys.org/news/2018-08-einstein-equivalence-principle-quantum-world.html

Einstein's equivalence principle contends that the total inertial and gravitational mass of any objects are equivalent, meaning all bodies fall in the same way when subject to gravity," Dr. Zych said.

What is wrong with Einstein (well at least after me anyway): Just about everything, unfortunately, even though Einstein and Hawkins (two dead men) are the godfather of AuT, I am the third godfather, or perhaps the unble; when I am dead it will be an orphan, the parents, Parmenides, Leonardo di bianacci and the unnamed mathematician whose work was preserved, probably from ancient egypt being long gone, the muse being the only Aunt.
inertia
mass
time
All of these are non-quantum phenomena, all of these are tied to time at least the gravitational mass that Einstein was obsessed with.
All dead, like the godfathers.