AuT-cleaning things up and the Marley post

Yesterday I had a fairly good workout on the stair machine followed by 3 sets of weights at my normal load.  I could have done better.  I at a bison burger, a piece of meat about the size of small tape measure, but still a lot for me and then had, perhaps coincidentally, perhaps not, dreams all night.
One was me running during the purge of the French Revolution.  The others have faded in the light of day which I regret.  If you read Vol 1 of AuT it covers a lot of why history repeats itself and why someone like me who is probably more in touch with this process than anyone else (I have filed a patent related to this) would worry about his dreams, particularly those where history repeats itself or where they are nightmares and not dreams.

I cannot begin to get into all of thethings I have had to face recently, the threats, both real and esoteric to me and my work, the outreach, teh progress and the setbacks.

One thing that I will spend some time on is the evolution from 2f(n)^n^2 to (2f(n)-1)^2^n-1 which can yield the 256:27 (4^4):3^3 and where that goes from f(n)=2 to f(n)=16 in predicting the amount of free or hinge information.

I cleaned up both Kindle and Createspace to get rid of the old versions of the book.
Now what is available are the following:
1) Vol1 of AuT compendium 2nd ed
2) Vol2 of AuT Compendium 1rst and unedited ed
3) Summary of Vol 1
4) All of my other books
5) Maybe the 1rst ed of Vol 1which would be a terrible book to order but has a lot of deleted (and rightfully so) content in the Kindle version.

The two above being respectively the kindle and print versions and

This being what the summary looks like in print which is close to what the kindle version will look like when it gets through the administrative hurdles.

I have the print version of the summary available, but not the kindle version which is being held up by some administrative questions since it is a summary of my own book.
There are (surprising to me) 21 books in this series written over 5 years, beginning with the Einstein Hologram Universe which was conceptually accurate, the two spiral books some of whose content survived long past the 2016 publication date of the second of those books when the model was still looking for the transition between non-dimensional features and dimensional feature, still trying to find a place for time and pi as the model, perhaps well into 2018.
Now there are only 3 books available in print, plus one for kindle versions which includes the second and unedited Volume 2.

Please see the author's Amazon page at: https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn and the author's Facebook page for more links and articles at https://www.facebook.com/frzmn1 or @frzmn1 from facebook

I spent a great deal of time worrying that I would stumble onto someone that came up with the same thing first.  It turned out to be an unnecessary concern, and still these articles (below on the god particle which is not ct1) predominate the news.  While I have submitted an article by invitation to rebut this (as of the 29th) there is no news yet as to its publication date, if any.

Scientists finally observed ‘God Particle’ behavior that supports our understanding of physics http://flip.it/vhqP3o

This is the section I am working on on the Marley post...

To Robert Boyle in the 17th century, shortly before Isaac Newton, the aether was a probable hypothesis and consisted of subtle particles, one sort of which explained the absence of vacuum and the mechanical interactions between bodies, and the other sort of which explained phenomena such as magnetism (and possibly gravity) that were inexplicable on the basis of the purely mechanical interactions of macroscopic bodies, "though in the ether of the ancients there was nothing taken notice of but a diffused and very subtle substance; yet we are at present content to allow that there is always in the air a swarm of steams moving in a determinate course between the north pole and the south".^[4]

Isaac Newton contended that light was made up of numerous small particles. This could explain such features as light's ability to travel in straight lines and reflect off surfaces. This theory was known to have its problems: although it explained reflection well, its explanation of refraction and diffraction was less satisfactory.^{[citation needed]} To explain refraction, Newton's Opticks (1704) postulated an "Aethereal Medium" transmitting vibrations faster than light, by which light, when overtaken, is put into "Fits of easy Reflexion and easy Transmission", which caused refraction and diffraction. Newton believed that these vibrations were related to heat radiation:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminiferous_aether

What was posted earlier was this (with some inserts in smaller text)
The ether experiment of Michelson and Marley was flawed.  It did not show this substitution rate because it only looked at ct3 (wave length variation) which occurs after the ct1-ct2 one dimensional exchange between space and photons.
"It compared the speed of light in perpendicular directions, in an attempt to detect the relative motion of matter through the stationary luminiferous aether ("aether wind"). The result was negative, in that Michelson and Morley found no significant difference between the speed of light in the direction of movement through the presumed aether, and the speed at right angles. This result is generally considered to be the first strong evidence against the then-prevalent aether theory, and initiated a line of research that eventually led to special relativity, which rules out a stationary aether.^{[A 1]} The experiment has been referred to as "the moving-off point for the theoretical aspects of the Second Scientific Revolution".^{[A 2]}

"Michelson–Morley type experiments have been repeated many times with steadily increasing sensitivity. These include experiments from 1902 to 1905, and a series of experiments in the 1920s. More recent optical resonator experiments confirmed the absence of any aether wind at the 10⁻¹⁷ level.^[2][3] Together with the Ives–Stilwelland Kennedy–Thorndike experiments, Michelson–Morley type experiments form one of the fundamental tests of special relativity theory.^{[A 3]"}

^{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Morley_experiment}

The Flaw (from AuT Compendium Vol 2)

The space-ether test of Michelson and Marley was flawed, every physicist but me is wrong and I've basically discovered everything or I'm wrong.  No seriously, the test is flawed.

The fixed velocity idea is incorrect because velocity includes both time and dimension.  Time is an illusion that only begins at ct3 and only at ct4 in earnest.

Light exchanges with space as a pre-time, pre-dimensional state.  Light itself has only two elements (dimensions) of time in its wave form and a time free one element (dimension) as photons.

.

Ether (the name they used for space before AuT) doesn't fill space, it is space itself and the earth doesn't move through it because it space is dimensionless.  Dimensionless things necessarily do not flow.  Solution order can exist without movement. At that level all things change at once so looking for consequent phase shifts in wavelengths is absurd.  

Lets talk about this and I'll start with a metaphor.  If I hold up a bag of sand and ask how much candy is in it and you guess 1 piece and we run it through a sieve and there is no candy you don't say that candy doesn't exist.  If you're really interested in the bag, you say we should be looking for sand and not candy in the bag.  

That is the problem with the test for the movement of light (or anything else through space).  Neither space nor light has time.  The shift due to movement through the "new" ether, doesn't occur because it is a ct2 outer shell-ct1 exchange whether in terms of waves or in terms of photons.

 We've known this since the 1920's.  Lorentz and Einstein solved for this.  Indeed, Einstein's comment that we all take our own time is the equivalent (given the proofs of AuT)of saying we take our own dimension with us.

Space has neither time nor dimension, but it still exists.  Passing through it requires that it be processed along with the higher compression states of information or everything would be stuck in place.  We have to distinguish between quantum change and time which are vastly different, the second requiring two different parts of dimension.

Light does not have time, but it does have one dimension.  However the velocity in one dimension, having no second rate of substitution has no relativity and that means that it has no time.  Looking for a time based change between space and light is like looking for candy in a bag that only has sand in it.  We know this, by the way, because acceleration to the speed of light eliminates time.  We also know that history requires sufficient information be carried from one compression state to the next to allow in a quantum state where nothing is moving the experiences of the prior states to be viewed (as history) although they cannot be "felt," at least not the way we are used to feeling things, since momentum is largely history being felt, by way of example.

The illusion of dimension in space is only because we carry our 3 dimensions with us.   It is like looking down on a sheet of drawings with two dimensions on them.  We see them in 3 dimensions even though they only have two.

Dimension arises from ratios of different dimensions and they allow us to look down on 2, 1 and 0 dimensional space with perspective which is apparent to us only because we are not total flatlanders.   Of course, compared to black hole states we are, but that is another chapter.