Living alone would suit me.
I forget a lot of important things about AuT. The single most important part of AuT is probably lost or perhaps forgotten in this blog somewhere.
Today turned difficult. I worked outside in the heat repairing some pumps and when I tried to swim to cool off, I could not do more than 1,000 yards. I walked the dog and even he thought it was unbearable. I feel unhealthy and probably am today. I am resting now, but I do not feel better, it is difficult even to drink anything; however I slept for 2 hours, I'm now frustrated and insomnia at 1 am after attempting to go back to sleep for an interminable time with no success.
Which brings us to death as discussed in the Science of Nostradamus.
If I die now it will be my fault and that I would go unfulfilled is also my fault.
I am now down to the last 7 pages in the 3rd romance novel.
I am leaning towards a non-religious form of reincarnation, again physics based.
Perhaps we come back over and over again in different forms different pieces built on a fragment of what went before. That means we don't just reincarnate once, but dozens of times, alive together, you can find yourself in the present, perhaps I already have. I have betrayed myself in this way directly and indirectly, but always without malice. Well some malice, but only to the direct self.
This makes sense because of the way the future is built on the past.
In my original thought, before fpix became the crucial element, I saw the future as somehow f-series building from the past. I believe that is only partially true now. The compression causes this to be the case, but you don't have full universes building from prior full universes, you just have the alteration of the information with f-series features. I don't have this figured out fully. But the idea is that the earth is a largely closed system and that means whatever happens cycles, history repeating itself as we tend towards the rocks from which we arise
The laws of thermodynamics are wrong, "Energy cannot be created or destroyed, it can only change form." This is not true, under AuT. The reasons are several. One is that the amount of what we call information is increased only by increasing the count which may be said to make information out of some prior pre-dimensional state. An exploration of this type is complicated, but only becomes possible with an AuT analysis.
It is not my job to reconcile AuT with all of physics.
AuT is a model. I use the words "This is how the universe works" and leave off "can" before work and "under this model" afterwards. That makes it easier to write.
Do I have to "prove" that all human and microscopic organism endeavor for the sole reason of returning some material to the moon? I do not think so. I don't even know if it matters whether that is true or not. AuT is a model. I am speaking towards a model. Peer review is appropriate because the damn model shows all the things it is supposed to, it has the right scales, weak gravity, short range weak and strong forces, net effect of forces, potential energy, wave particle duality, velocity and gravity dilation. I am pretty uncomfortable with the change-history methodology because of quantum state memory problems that were better solved with other approached, but the f-series building remains because all the changes are stretches containing f-series movements (any compression or decompression is reflected in fibonacci stacking or unwinding which is another thing that AuT explains when we see these patterns when we look out); but it is a model. I was finally able to accept the history-change features of ct1 alteration of ct3 displays because (1) ct3 is how we store information and (2) it worked so well to explain both types of dilation. But it is far from perfect. The idea of ct1 escaping instead of being trapped within the higher ct3-4-5 matrix is a very complex concept. Still, AuT is a good model. It is a simple model with complex results.
It is the best model, it is essentially if not in all its details the right model.
It is not my job to prove this nor is it my job to explain all of these articles which circle around it.
Phys.org: Ultracold atoms used to verify 1963 prediction about 1-D electrons. https://phys.org/news/2018-09-ultracold-atoms-d-electrons.html
With IBM and others committed to incorporating one-dimensional carbon nanotubes into integrated circuits, chip designs will increasingly need to account for 1D effects that arise from electrons being fermions, antisocial particles that are unwilling to share space.
Stranger still, because of this collective behavior, TLL theory predicts that a moving electron in 1D will seemingly split in two and travel at different speeds, despite the fact that electrons are fundamental particles that have no constituent parts. This strange breakup, known as spin-charge separation, instead involves two inherent properties of the electron—negative charge and angular momentum, or "spin."
Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-09-ultracold-atoms-d-electrons.html#jCp
There are so many problems with this article that it can only be solved by AuT.
First, what we know is that electrons are not one dimensional. This is the standard pre-AuT misunderstanding about what is being looked at.
What is being "seen" here is the one dimensional effects of photons.
The next problem is the "fundamental" fermion nonsense of the standard model. While AuT is a partially filed information state of ct3-ct4 transitions, obviously ct1,2 and 3 states are fundmental.
"In a one-dimensional wire, electrons can move to the left or to the right, but they cannot go around other electrons," said Hulet, Rice's Fayez Sarofim Professor of Physics. "If you add energy to the system, they move, but because they're fermions and can't share space, that movement, or excitation, causes a kind of chain reaction.
"One electron moves, and it nudges the next one to move and the one next to that one and so on, causing the energy you've added to move down the wire like a wave," Hulet said. "That single excitation has created a ripple everywhere in the wire."
Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-09-ultracold-atoms-d-electrons.html#jCp
Ultracold merely means that changes are happening at a slower rate in terms of ct1 decompression.
http://www.symmetrymagazine.
The related question is what did the early univese look like when ct1 changes were different.
https://phys.org/news/2017-02-
Empty space is the most solid thing which changes the pre-AuT ideas on the difference between solid and space, space, ct1, changes moving other things which are blocks of ct1 folded and they move into other dimensions which is what we call progressively more solid.
But the real problem is that space, dimension and time are nothing at all like what we thought with the standard model, string theory, relativity or anything else. Moreover the mistakes are obvious ones once the true nature of dimensional features are understood.
People continue to buy the out of date and hard to understand audio book.
I am unhappy and sleepless.
No comments:
Post a Comment