Pages

Friday, September 28, 2018

neutrinos and hinge states as transition states

I have been working towards dealing with the hinge/trapped state problem in AuT which is neither difficult nor unusual but requires a great deal more study than the more obvious and easilty identified features of AuT.  This is the first of two posts connected withthat.
It is a part of rewrite of the second volume of the compendium, currently cut down from 750 pages (approx) to 454 with a target of 300 pages or less.  While intended to supplement Vol 1 which is a complete presentation of the theory, it will contain novel portions such as those related to hinge states which are critical to a full understanding of the change between ct states.
It has been suggested that Neutrinos are possibly transitional space-photons or even pure photons given the nature of things, although their near invisibility most strongly suggests the previously disclosed (see the book below-AuT Compendium Vol 1, 2nd edition) transitional state, most likely a 1:3 transitional state although a 2:3 state is possible.  This is suggested by the model.
https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn
https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn

https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn
https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn


THis article shows the futility of seeing these transitions which occur in the 10^-38/second range.
CNN: The ultimate mystery of the universe (Opinion). https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/20/opinions/protodune-neutrino-antimatter-opinion-lincoln/index.html

http://mashable.com/2017/05/02/worlds-fastest-camera-sweden/

There is another important feature of AuT which is hinge states which is covered in detail for the first time in the second edition (currently unpublished) of AuTC Vol 2. The first part of this discussion appears below although reference at least to the summary is important to fully comprehend its importance.
https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn
https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn



1.      The (256)32/27 Hinge state problem


Figure 6  The interaction of dimensional states
          The derivations of fpix require recalculation for each point and the memory of all prior solutions along with their modification.
 Pi changes for each increase in information and so does sin. 
There is no denominator for pi before ct1, so in the ct0 environment there is only positive and negative potential which increases in quantity.
Ct1 has no dimensional quality, but allows for separation of ct0 information in the form of order and a changing lifespan.
At ct2, a single dimension does not allow for folding, but adds the potential for things to go either towards or away from compression.
At ct3 the second dimension allows for folding.
While a single neutron represents a ct4 state, we experience reality as transitional states via the alignment of these 3-dimensional ct4 states as compressed towards the initial ct5 state.
The net tendency towards compression at the ct1 level leads to the impression of gravity which is partially offset by the gross decompression that is reflected as velocity.
These lower dimensional changes occur with concentrations far below those where mass would be affected, but they dilute the dimension and control sub-molecular features of the ct3-4-5 transition states.
Resulting curvature from the ratio of different compression states is presumed to hold clues to compression just as the denominator of pi reflects the charge and features of the charge of ct1 states as a function of what is, for lack of a better term, called ct0 which is a primordial stuff from which the universe is built.  While it is fine to call this “information” that is a cop out since it really is a ‘thing’ which can hold charge and memory which makes it very complicated.
To try to come to grips with how dimension ratios interact and form AuT looks for clues.
Since ct0 has positive and negative results, the starting point is to look at the math that yields curvature equations for -1 and 1.
Sin(pi=1) to sin(pi=-1) yields a ratio of 32/27/8.  This is the .148148 ratio solution highlighted or y=256/27 in the equation 2*y/(pi0^(2n+1) which yields mirror image results for pi=1 and -1.  
Put another way, dimensional curvature of the universe originates from the application of fpix from which is derived the simple compression function 2f(n)^2^n which comes from the simple equation: 256/27/(-1)=negative of 256/27/1.
The 8 is separated for the inquiry since “whole numbers” come as -8 and 8 if 32/27 is used.  
     
27 in base 2 is 11011 and 33 is 100001.
8 is 1000 and 256 is 1 followed by 8 zeroes.
If we are looking to place and we are trying to find patterns we can say there are two places on either side of 0 as opposed to the -1-0-1 results for -1^x.  There is no reason to expect this pattern (after all 5 is base 2 is 101) or to restrict ourselves to base 2, but it is worth considering other ways of looking at numbers when attempting to figure out transition points.

          27 is 3^3 which suggests a relationship of -1^n and fpix which would be 3,9,27 matching the 4:16:64:256 by providing a “hinge” where the colons appear between the solutions.
electron/proton
ELEC
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
10000000
1E+08
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
6.25E+14
1.25E+15
1.875E+15
2.5E+15
3.125E+15
3.75E+15
4.375E+15
5E+15
9.375E+15
8.75E+15
8.125E+15
7.5E+15
6.875E+15
6.25E+15
5.625E+15
5E+15
15
7
4.333333333
3
2.2
1.666666667
1.285714286
1
wave with ct2 cloud
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
6
36
216
1296
7776
46656
279936
1679616
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
209952
419904
629856
839808
1049760
1259712
1469664
1679616
1469664
1259712
1049760
839808
629856
419904
209952
0
7
3
1.666666667
1
0.6
0.333333333
0.142857143
0
ct1 with space cloud
1
2
3
4
4
16
64
256
3
2
1
0
64
128
192
256
192
128
64
0
3
1
0.333333333
0
black hole
ELEC
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
16
128
1024
8192
65536
524288
4194304
33554432
31
30
29
28
27
26
25
24
1.06338E+37
2.12676E+37
3.19015E+37
4.25353E+37
5.31691E+37
6.38029E+37
7.44368E+37
8.51E+37
3.29649E+38
3.19015E+38
3.08381E+38
2.97747E+38
2.87113E+38
2.76479E+38
2.65846E+38
2.55E+38
31
15
9.666666667
7
5.4
4.333333333
3.571428571
3

This table shows the first part of the electron/proton compression scale as well as the first part of the black hole.
          Just as you have 3^3 in the first case, you would have 4:6:10 states for the base of the 2^n states so too you have some relationship here 3:x:y.  This could well be 2f(x)-1 yielding 3:5:9.
          The exponential ^3 could easily be replaced with (2^2)-1.  This would yield 3:7:15 and so on for the hinge states (3^3;5^7;9^15).
          The other choice is just multiplying the 27 by the number of ct1 states, although one other option is combining these two.
         
ct2 states
2f(n)^2n
ct1 units
2*f(n)
2^n
 changing
compression
CT1 units
N
ratio
per quantum
1
2
2
4
2
4
4
1
256
256
3
6
8
1679616
1.68E+06
4.30E+08
4
10
16
1.67962E+22
1E+16
4.29982E+24
5
16
32
5.71544E+60
3.40282E+38
1.46315E+63

The combination looks like this:

5
3 Hinge
combined
beginning
states
(end is total)
unbalanced
4
27
6
78125
3.36E+13
10
2.05891E+14
8.85294E+38
16
4.3144E+37
6.3126E+100

The more traditional way and credible way of approaching this is to just increase the number of hinge states just by the number of ct2 states.
3 Hinge combined 27 times
states no of ct2
27
78125 3.36E+13 45349632
2.05891E+14 8.85294E+38 4.53E+23
4.3144E+37 6.3126E+100 1.54E+62

One issue that is raised by these numbers is that give the number of these higher states (e.g. the number of neutrons and black holes) indicate a lot of information making up the universe.
The first shows the increase based on the 2f(x)-1^(2^n-1).  The second shows a much, much higher number combining the ct1 units * 27.  While this number may seem very large in some respects, it remains possible that since the increase is exponential on one level it is on the other.
          This enormous number of potential hinge states given the combined total may allow for the continuous compression and net unfolding of information we see as 790,000mph galactic movement without requiring a breakdown. It might also reflect the lifespan of higher states in that the difference between (for ct 3 between 78,125 and 3.36x10^13) might be the amount of variation in hinge states between complete stability and complete breakdown of these states.
          The trapped information/hinge state analysis remains the most uncertain aspect of AuT, but the suggested 3-state solution and the 27-factor observed in curvature ratios remains suggestive.
          In the 3-state solution (below) by changing the arrangement you can get an explanation for particle and anti-particles where the net reflects the number of particles vs antiparticles that we experience today because of the alignment that predominates in a net expansion cycle or due to just the base solution orders predominating and thereby crowding out the alternative solutions as hinge states.

https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn

No comments:

Post a Comment