Pages

Friday, September 7, 2018

The golden ratio and pi and why fundamental rules fail*

It was weird taking all of my books out of print except for the newest editions.
20 something books on this topic, makes me wonder if I am not more compulsive than I think.  You and impending doom, well two types of impending doom, did that to me, but why did it happen?  Was it because I was a monster, like you thought, or because there is another monster that even you answer to?
I will tackle that in this post.
First, some housekeeping matters.
I have begun to reach out directly to some potential development partners for this project, just a couple to go along with the two presentation (vc presentation) options which I tentatively reached out to when the short version of the book was completed and which have not responded yet.
It is true I could go to one of these vc conference without presenting but given the way the universe works that seems like a questionable route.
In addition, I do not yet have the print copies which I will need to edit again.
In the posts prior to this I have redone the summary of the theory in a few paragraphs.
A comparison is given between the standard polynomial compression is shown below.




While the first transition from ct1 to ct2 is fairly easy to represent, the second transition from ct2 to ct3 is more challenging without an extremely large canvas and for perspective the scale is changed for every transition after the ct1 to ct2 transition.
What this represents, however, is how polynomial math compares to F-sereies math and how place can vary based on a different dimensional manipulation which is, nevertheless precise and based on the evolution from pi to the Fibonacci series and then to exponential matching based on matching like states.

ScienceAlert: A Fundamental Physics Law Just Failed a Test Using Nanoscale Objects. https://www.sciencealert.com/planck-radiative-heat-transfer-fails-far-field-nanoscale-objects

This article sets out how "the experimental result is 100 times greater than the predicted figure, suggesting nanoscale objects can emit and absorb heat with far greater efficiency than current models can explain."

This is a yet another reason why Pre-AuT physics fails
There are so many problems to pick apart with pre-AuT physics that it is hard to pick a place to start with.

The first is that heat is not what we might think it is.  Heat movement is the transition of ct1 states to or away from various forms of compression.  Because of compression effects, you can have ct1 states compress to ct2, ct2 to ct3 with massive amounts of ct1 being incoporated or entrapped within the folds.  While there are several models (set out in the book) for entrapped states, the ability of the model to release 27 ct1 states for every ct2 in the "sin model" and given that there are 6^8 ct2 states in a single quantum wave and 10^16 quantum waves states (ct3) in a single neutron,  then that the quantities of liberateable ct1, not to mention entrapped ct1 are massive compared to what the current theoretical model suggests.




No comments:

Post a Comment