Imagine integrating this from negative 2 (-1)to 2:
1/(1-x)dx. This may be envisioned as going from writing the universe to printing it. By strange coincidence is the way that the Einstein Hologram universe was written, how's that for irony. Let me digress. I did not mean to hijack Einstein into my theory. He only appears here by virtue of something he said which led to this interpretation of hologram theory which I also did not mean to hijack, although this hologram may join well to a two dimensional to three dimensional model since the dimensions build, it has linear time for strings, and it seeks to explain the same phenomena; but it's built on a shakier foundation. But let's try to change that.
If you can do the integration, you can go from a negative universe to a positive one, but this requires you pass through infinity but we'll get to That.
Let's talk about some ideas about the universe based on gravity measurements:
Scientists (Newtonian) believe that the universe is made up of 73% dark energy (very low gravity driving the universe apart) and 23% Dark matter which I should say is believed to be too concentrated to be space, but we'll ignore that for the moment even though it is largely observed. This leaves 4% for ordinary matter and energy. Ordinary matter is a little over 3.6% of the universe; the other .4% being "luminous matter" which includes stars and gases with only .005% being radiation. This is by weight. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter. Now, E-H theory says it should be a measure by the amount of time in the universe and not weight, but E-H theory says they are related.
You know where this is going, we're going to try to estimate these forces using statistics.
So let's talk about the conversion of time to space plus everything else and negative energy coming form the conversion of matter to black holes overcoming the gravity seeking to pull everything back together.
First, we know what the amount of dark energy and dark matter is from the total matter in the universe.
This gives us a percentage of how much "mass" space has under this theory. It also gives us a mass/energy ratio for dark energy and dark matter to regular matter and energy. It should be noted for this discussion that the dark energy is space being created first from the transition we discussed above (big bang in traditional physics) and now from matter and energy being converted to energy and space in black holes.
Knowing the pressure on the universe and the number of black holes and the average matter going into black holes (energy is critical here also, but energy has a very limited gravity because of the c^2 conversion factor which is going to be similar to the conversion factor for space into energy.
This allow us to do this type of calculation...but before I set it out, we are just building as we go along. I haven't thought out the exact type of calculation. What I am trying to do today, is just say that this theory can be tested, someone just has to take the time to design the right test, that is the right formula and I'm not going to do that sober at 11:00 at night.
But enough excuses, on to the type of equation:
(avg matter into black holes) x average number of black holes=amount of space being created (even though much of the space is converted into energy according to our observations we know the numbers are limited because of the amount of dark energy in the universe compared to the amount of regular energy and also because we know these conversions are accomplished according to massive factors (again the TYPE of ratio (c^2) must be part of the equation if there is consistency, but we will discuss this with the actual numbers later.) That is the number of energy times necessary to join to make 1 mass time is 1xc^2 which is a bunch, as it were. We may see an exponential increase in the amount of space created and note it has to be enough to power the initial expansion of the universe and it has to be enough to continue the expansion through the conversion of mass to space and energy in black holes.
Keep in mind that we already know how much dark matter and dark energy is in the universe. What we are looking for is the conversion ratios, i.e. how much space is required in order to create an energy (we already know e=mc^2 for the amount of energy necessary to make matter) and how much time must be converted to create a cubic inch of space as it were.
Because this is an ongoing process, theoretically at black holes we have some rough estimates to work with.
one is that we see 90% of the matter going into black holes coming out as energy. If it isn't coming out as energy, it would go into increasing the mass of the black hole. If this number were accurate (and I'm not saying it is) we can determine the amount (10% in this rough example if nothing is adding to the mass of the black holes) of mass going into making space and we can then determine how much space is being added to the universe. Let me lay this out to anyone who doesn't want to get out a pencil:
1) x the number of black holes
2) y light years of expansion per second
3) z pounds of matter going into the average black hole per second
4) a=mass added to black holes, b=energy coming from black hole, S=amount of space being created each second in all the black holes:
S=(a-(b/c^2))*x*z
We can then use S and y(observed expansion of the universes) in order to see how much dimension is added by the space created.
Of course we have to take into account the corresponding gravity that must be overcome, etc. but we can see if the theory is supported by observation and if it is we can start talking about how to change time coordinates for large bodies where the time coordinates are changing in proximity and at the same rate which will allow us to move those large bodies instantaneously about the illusion that is our universe and that might be fun.
Now one thing you have to do in any equation is check your units. That is, after taking out all of the units (cancelling them against one another, you have to end up with the right unit (here m^3 (meters cubed), I'd guess); but we don't have the finished product in this blog, just a rough conceptual piece to work on later.
No comments:
Post a Comment