I woke this morning wondering if I should tackle the irregular universe or not.
It is early and I have been lucky enough to find something other than a waffle house or its equivalent for coffee.
I feel self doubt within me.
There is a certain amount of futility associated wtih all human activity and performing to this audience is sometimes feels too real to me.
Diracs model of the universe and teh standard model does not impress me, but the audience does.
I wonder if it is not more about the audience than the truth for people. While that may sound irrelevant we are surrounded by examples of that. We can start at the president who I am not condemning outright, but he is a cartoon character, kratocracy, I believe, is the word for government by the worst. The audience, not the truth, at least in that case. Is Trump evil or does he rail against the publich, "The truth, you (the american public) cannot handle the truth."
Opera to an empty audience and packed houses for something, everyone can pick something, they do not like. does it lower the value of the opera, is this evolution or is something else going on?
I have been bullied for my physics, that is something which I can understand, the baseness of people and something I cannot understand, why would anyone close their minds to a theory. Does anyone deserve an audience or to be bullied or does everyone earn what they get?
The Dirac universe says we earn it, the AuT universe says it is assigned to us.
Having warmed up, let me tackle the idea of matter and antimatter in aut.
AuT does not really have anti matter. This is a problem in a world where matter and antimatter seem to coexist after a fashion. For almost the entire two or three years I have tied myself to the idea of explaining anti-matter, somehing which exists only in theoretical frameworks to explain what is observed in super-colliders and what is interpreted in space observations, two very strong arguments for its existence, just as the Higgs Boson was "spotted" by looking at a super collider showing in my theory nothing more than a transitional state aberration so too must anti matter as it is seen in AuT morph intosomething the theory can accept.
The post will not conslusively deal with those issues. There are two books (AuT 7 and 8) which deal with the story behind the Higgs boson and I have not even begun the inquiry in earnest behind mattter and antimatter because I blindly accepted antimatter until now, just as most physicists blindly accept the standard model and its accompanying nonsense (I have to concentrate on truth and not the audience, sing opera to the empty theater; I already prostitute myself in another venue for a living).
So we have to start by looking at what AuT predicts and what we observe.
An Anti particle has to be looked at also.
AuT predicts a wide variety of matterish states.
First there are the slowly filling information arms of ct4 adn then the molecular arms of ct5.
Then there is the electron/proton connundrum which leads to the deconstructing neutron idea that for some reason that I have not explained yet, the proton and electron are ct4-7 and ct4-9 arms begging the question, why not ct4-6 adn ct4-10 arms? is it because of averaging or some other method where all of these perimeter states can exist, are they somehow invisible to us, part of the energy that we experience around us perhaps part of the energy experienced around the atoms that we recognize?
Part of the answer to this lies in the idea that we don not properly see what w are looking at, a math solution looking around it and finding self importance is illogical, but that type of self analysis does not answer any questions.
So I have to start with the idea that the unbalanced universe has some issues which have not been addressed and the AuT universe has some of the same features. A new look at atomic and mollecular structure that offers to explain what the electron and neutron are without explaining the missing elements surrounding them is as flawed as the model which cannot explain the missing anti-matter predicted and I accept that as part of theAuT model that remains undetermined, but which can be mathematically determined by one of those explanations above or one that has not be proferred yet or which might undermine a theory which has at least as many grains of truth as the standard model.
So auT has a model for the creation of dimension and ultimately matter which defines a specific type of matter and loosely looks at unbalanced states as charged states where charge is only one element out of balance in a very large number of elements and hence the difference between a proton and a neutron is only one arm of 16 which is only partially loaded.
Aut holds that next higher ct states must be constructed, at least loosely, by complete next lower states:
To build ct4 you cannot use ct2, you need ct3. The ratio of compression is 1ct4:10^16ct3. Since force is not a feature of AuT the solution relies heavily on the idea that just rigidly controlled mathematical solutions give rise to what is observed, not some preaut force model. That is part of the problem in looking for answers both to the proton-anti-proton problem as well as the electron proton cunnundrum in the standard model and AuT respectively.
So where we find ourselvees is that for some reason the positive and negative aspects of both AuT at the EPC balance and the antimatter is positive to negative at this point primarily. AuT does have the governing underlying positive and negative tendency which does not have another place and this is important here because it lost its importance in other places.
Early on AuT tied the fpix solution to gravity and then, as it was studied further tied gravity to the ct2 arms filling or unfilling with ct1, a related but different function and one that fit better within the concept of going linear or going dimensional from a non-dimensional state.
This left the whole fpix converging series (as x changes) from net positive to net negative open, dangling without a purpose but as certain as any other infinite series in the model. And here, it comes down to roost at last, an explanation, purely math driven.
At different points in the universe, irregardless of whether it is expanding or contracting the net local and net universal value of the underlying ct1 states are positive or negative. This underlying state changes. This then suggests that right now that underlying state is of such a charge that anti-matter is discouraged and matter is encouraged and no feature has to be added to get us here.
Thus endith part1
No comments:
Post a Comment