.35% 1 of 2

If the net rate of unwinding can be compared to the speed of light then the .35% relative movement might indicate a .35% net unwinding, but the maximum rate 13 billion years ago would be less than 2 or 3%.
This is so interesting, that I want to tell part of it and then let it sink in before getting to the rest.
I want to be with you, only with you forever.  That's not the part to sink in.
Here is what needs to sink in.
We co-exist with unraveling (waves and photons) at the speed of light.
But atomic movement (ct4 movement including transitions along the information arms) folded at 1x10^16 is .35%.
We've considered this before and theorized:

Beginning at ct3 relative change means that certain changes occur together creating a relative change of 1 (ct0):256 (ct2):, 1.68x10^6 (ct3) which means that the relative change of ct3 relative to ct2 is (1) a maximum of 1 ct2 change for each ct3 (1.68x10^6/256) at light speed meaning there are 256 gradations of speed possible for waves relative to the speed of light.

There is another way to look at this using these same numbers and the same ratios and assuming that 1:256 can be replaced with the 1:1.68x10^6 ratio which is the newer vision of things.

The speed of light requires time which when figured in at 5.4x10^44 quantum changes per second which comes from and can be measured against light speed 399,792,458 m/s (4x10^8) and convert meters to the minimum quantum length (Planck length which is 1.6x10-35 of a meter) we see the unusual relationship between quantum change unfolded and the molecular folded mass 16^32*1x10^16  or 3.4x10^48 what we see is that the small percentage varies in a way not inconsistent fractionally with the result that we would expect from a highly compressed state's compression relative to the ct3 wave states operating based on being dragged at the so called speed of light by unraveling.

All the math is here, is just a question of how we work with it, understanding that the maximum speed of unraveling for the universe as a whole has dropped by 2/3 according to observations.

This might also allow some idea of the amount of trapped material, particularly if we can assume that it is being released at a rate suggested by the 2/3 to 13 billion year ratio.
So the question I put to you, is assuming this relative speed of light movement can be related to compression, where we are, not for the universe as a whole, how does it work?
Noting that the rate is slowing down, this would mean the maximum rate varies from a maximum 13 billion years ago to the this .35% down to an even slower percentage

Things might not be that simple, it might take something more complicated to be in love and it might be more complicated for speed also.
You might not be able to look at our speed and compare it to the speed of light and get a net unwinding rate because there are many other ways to deal with this.  But the scales of speed, distance and compression ratio seem to indicate a greater simplicity is possible at least with movement relative to the speed of light..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIXs66BPooY