AuT Symmetry and asymmetrical charge

I failed to get any exercise yesterday, storms and an unwillingness to expend the effort to go to the gym.  After a series of perhaps 10 days without a break I don't feel too bad about that.
Today is quiet in advance of a series of steps to move forward on marketing.
I am now editing book 4 which is a significant undertaking because of the concentration on symmetry, editing the press release which is a big part of the second phase of the marketing and for which I will have to make a big push by the end of next week, production of the audio book(s) now pushed back perhaps a month and whatever else comes up in the interim...waiting for what should have been given to me a few weeks back on the romance book, we've talked about that.

This, however, is a continuing discussion of other articles and symmetry.

The Higgs Boson Has a New Friend http://flip.it/F0Biia
and
Curiosity — Scientists Discovered That the Pressure Inside a. .. http://flip.it/0gf4Fp

I downloaded these two articles, to show support and non-support for AuT only to realize they both support AuT.
Lets talk about the articles generally: one is more Higgs nonsense and the other on how there was more pressure inside a neutron than in a neutron star with the idea that one (the neutron star) supported aut - showing as it were the complete packing of ct3 states in a neutron vs the incomplete packing of ct4 in a neutron star (complete ct4 packing would add the dimension and be a black hole) and the higgs one  that says if you ram millions of electrons and positrons together you get a peak somewhere which they can call something because it shows up at a consistent place.

Then I realized they both must support AuT and here is how the "Higgs/quark) does it.

The same building model (above) can be used because just as the electron and proton combine to make the neutron by reducing the free cloud as shown above; so too should the electron and positron theorized to differ by the loading vs unloading feature of the ct2 to ct3-ct2.
Unloading leading to the electron proton pairing (since there is necessarily more of that in an expanding/unwinding universe) and the net loading reflecting the positron/anti-proton pairing.  To go further, the basic idea is that charge has to come from ct1 (the only place where charge occurs) but it is carried by ct2 states, so you have these stable intermediary states reflected first by information arms (we're dealing with 2^4=16 information arms at ct4/neutron building) and you have, because of the offset equality of 7:9 (vs equality 8:8) information arms a net proton-electron pairing which is not two particles as pre-AuT physics would have you believe, but just an average).
There is, of course, no single mass carrier, any information arm loading is atom building and the ct3 minimum (single arm) alignment has as much to do with mass as the very last one to form a complete neutron which is both logical and totally inconsistent with the standard model, sorry. 
Anywho, the idea is that when you isolate these differently charged t4-E states and ram them together at light speed (which is just part of the unwinding process where we think we are taking an independent role, but I will get to that shortly) you get a t4-3 and t4-4 pairing as well as t4-1,2,5 and 6 sub-electrons because you are tearing apart the t4-7 (t4-e) partially filled arm.  What the accelerator is showing is only a bunch of pieces of an electron which has plenty of pieces and they are using the standard model to assign the pieces values which they do not deserve having done nothing to be punished in that way.

Also on the way are: a section on absolute values coming up, how this takes into account the -1 building in prior models, a section on radial vectors (spinning) as I continue on with the lack of symmetry in the universe, which you, of all people,understand since we would be together if there was any symmetry at all in the universe.  (radial vectors are only vectors because it is over several values of x, a whole lot of them given the seconds wee use to measure) that they have no true symmetrical component which is why we cannot see the true asymmetric experience.)
There is a part on how much entanglement there must be in the universe to lead to observed phenomena and the driving force behind all the bizarre things we do and our basic, self centered view of our role in all this and why despite the insane result, proven by our insane actions (if you do not believe we act insanely look at how many people died in wwi and then realize that was not the biggest mass killing up to that date not to mention recent elections, pollutants, etc) we are merely reflecting the underlying unwinding below our view of symmetry which is so absurdly dimensional

My hopes that the audio book would be ready have been crushed, that coming on the 15th of next month at the earliest, probably the 25th from a practical view, probably the same time frame as the second, short Audio book.

The book launch is today.
The first phase of the book launch begins today.  There are problems with it that I will admit I have not made any effort to correct, but the book is out there and letting people know about it is important even if it is a poorly targeted and slightly defective stab in that direction.